this post was submitted on 03 Jul 2025
823 points (99.5% liked)

Games

40318 readers
2457 users here now

Welcome to the largest gaming community on Lemmy! Discussion for all kinds of games. Video games, tabletop games, card games etc.

Rules

1. Submissions have to be related to games

Video games, tabletop, or otherwise. Posts not related to games will be deleted.

This community is focused on games, of all kinds. Any news item or discussion should be related to gaming in some way.

2. No bigotry or harassment, be civil

No bigotry, hardline stance. Try not to get too heated when entering into a discussion or debate.

We are here to talk and discuss about one of our passions, not fight or be exposed to hate. Posts or responses that are hateful will be deleted to keep the atmosphere good. If repeatedly violated, not only will the comment be deleted but a ban will be handed out as well. We judge each case individually.

3. No excessive self-promotion

Try to keep it to 10% self-promotion / 90% other stuff in your post history.

This is to prevent people from posting for the sole purpose of promoting their own website or social media account.

4. Stay on-topic; no memes, funny videos, giveaways, reposts, or low-effort posts

This community is mostly for discussion and news. Remember to search for the thing you're submitting before posting to see if it's already been posted.

We want to keep the quality of posts high. Therefore, memes, funny videos, low-effort posts and reposts are not allowed. We prohibit giveaways because we cannot be sure that the person holding the giveaway will actually do what they promise.

5. Mark Spoilers and NSFW

Make sure to mark your stuff or it may be removed.

No one wants to be spoiled. Therefore, always mark spoilers. Similarly mark NSFW, in case anyone is browsing in a public space or at work.

6. No linking to piracy

Don't share it here, there are other places to find it. Discussion of piracy is fine.

We don't want us moderators or the admins of lemmy.world to get in trouble for linking to piracy. Therefore, any link to piracy will be removed. Discussion of it is of course allowed.

Authorized Regular Threads

Related communities

PM a mod to add your own

Video games

Generic

Help and suggestions

By platform

By type

By games

Language specific

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The page seems to be not working at the moment but keep on signing https://eci.ec.europa.eu/045/public/#/screen/home

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Essence_of_Meh@lemmy.world 106 points 20 hours ago* (last edited 20 hours ago) (1 children)

Fresh update video from Ross about the campaign.

TL;DW:

  • There's a chance many of the signatures for the EU petition aren't real. Keep signing to build up a safety margin. Official suggestions are: 10% more minimum, 20% pretty OK, up to 40% more for an actual safety net.
  • Some countries had problems with signing using the digital ID system - suggests to use the manual method (instructions on the campaign page) or try again later.
  • Someone not related with the campaign released a SKG crypto. Don't touch it, obviously.
  • Ross heard about people harassing Pirate Software, asks to stop.
  • He's got a lot of messages to reply to, prioritises ones important to the campaign for now.
  • UK petition cleared 100k signatures. Number is most likely more reliable than the EU one.
  • Link about contacting UK MP's for those who want to do more than just sign a petition.
[–] SomethingBurger@jlai.lu 191 points 1 day ago (2 children)

If you're in the EU, you should still sign; extra signatures will be useful if it turns out some of them are invalid.

[–] Tetsuo@jlai.lu 40 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

To be clear... If you have already signed, thank you but do not sign again.

(I know that's not what you wanted to say, I just want to make sure it's not misunderstood).

[–] MrScottyTay@sh.itjust.works 5 points 16 hours ago (2 children)

Does it not stop you from signing multiple times? The UK one tells you you've already signed it when you try again. I tried it again recently in case i was misremembering signing the second petition after the first one was misunderstood completely by the uk government.

[–] zerofk@lemmy.zip 5 points 9 hours ago (2 children)

Oddly, the EU one just has a checkbox that you need to check to confirm that you haven’t signed before. I’m guessing removal of duplicates happens only after closing, along with other data validation.

I thought this strange at first too, but I think it’s because of the disparate identification methods in different countries. If everyone had a digital ID card instant checking would be doable, but note it probably isn’t.

[–] Opisek@lemmy.world 5 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

That's not true. It depends on the country. In certain countries it will tell you if your identification number had been used before.

[–] zerofk@lemmy.zip 2 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

Interesting! I tried from a country that has an eID so it should be trivial to weed out duplicates, yet I got that checkbox.

[–] Opisek@lemmy.world 2 points 4 hours ago

Maybe it's a self report feature >.<

[–] MrScottyTay@sh.itjust.works 1 points 8 hours ago

For the UK one it's just tied to your email address to prevent duplicates, and you just input your name and physical address which will be used to confirm you're actually a citizen.

[–] kuhli@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

Wait, what happened with the first one?

[–] Burnedspaghetti@lemmy.world 4 points 13 hours ago (1 children)
[–] Armok_the_bunny@lemmy.world 4 points 10 hours ago

After giving such a bad answer to it that some other part of the government stepped in and said the answer was dramatically insufficient.

[–] Wizard_Pope@lemmy.world 48 points 1 day ago

Yeah I signet 10 months ago. Also put the link in the post

[–] Pika@sh.itjust.works 81 points 22 hours ago (2 children)

Definitely keep signing, I'm really concerned at the speed it rose , and I'm really hoping there wasn't something else at play here.

[–] threeonefour@piefed.ca 57 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

It was Critikal and PewDiePie saying to sign it. They could get a million signatures on literally anything.

[–] WhyJiffie@sh.itjust.works 4 points 13 hours ago

but dozens a minute increase in the dawn hours?

[–] pezhore@infosec.pub 24 points 22 hours ago

Someone posted a screenshot from 4chan where they were talking about how to fake submissions... 😠

[–] vorpuni@jlai.lu 16 points 17 hours ago

At the current rate (which may or may not hold and may or may not be legitimate) the initiative should beat “One of Us”, the biggest one yet with 1.9M signatures (pro-life, ultimately did nothing).

[–] daniskarma@lemmy.dbzer0.com 51 points 23 hours ago (4 children)

I'm glad. But don't get your hopes up because of this. Commission could (and probably will) just say "we have considered it and we are going to do nothing".

[–] e8d79@discuss.tchncs.de 27 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

I think the commission will take action in some form. The worst case scenario in my mind is that they will only require clear labelling. Similar to what they did with smart phones recently. While this not exactly what I am hoping for, having "This game will at least be playable until XXXX" on the package or store page would still be a massive improvement over the status quo.

[–] Rekorse@sh.itjust.works 7 points 21 hours ago (2 children)

I dont understand how such a broad requirement would work. They just have to pick some arbitrary date, and then after that they can continue as things currently are? Can you give an example of a game where this type of labelling would have helped?

[–] e8d79@discuss.tchncs.de 24 points 21 hours ago* (last edited 21 hours ago)

'The Crew' by Ubisoft was sold for several months before they decided to shut it down. This would have at least forced them to communicate that before taking peoples money. I am also pretty sure that publishers don't want to put this information on the package because it could seriously hurt sales. So the effect of this labelling requirement might be that publishers build the game in a way that enables self-hosting.

[–] Sonicdemon86@lemmy.world 13 points 21 hours ago (2 children)

Yes if we would have known that Concord only lasted two weeks then those that bought the battle pass wouldn't have bought them. Know eol timing help consumers.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] vorpuni@jlai.lu 8 points 17 hours ago

They are supposed to meet with the seven people who first put the initiative forward. It won't change their minds if they're already against the initiative but if they don't care it may sway them to hear it explained to them. I have zero expectations since EU bureaucrats live in a parallel dimension but there's some hope something happens.

[–] Tattorack@lemmy.world 29 points 23 hours ago

We've done nothing and already completely ran out of ideas!

[–] SomethingBurger@jlai.lu 19 points 22 hours ago

At least we will have an official position, instead of the legal void we're currently in.

[–] resetbypeer@lemmy.world 16 points 19 hours ago

This should not stop, the more the merry and also to ensure to filter out anomalies. 34k have already signed pass the million

[–] Aielman15@lemmy.world 10 points 20 hours ago* (last edited 20 hours ago)

I swear this is not me doomering (I very much support this campaign and even signed it myself half a year ago), but I strongly suspect that at least a good chunk of those are fake. The issue is very hot in "terminally online" circles and those are the kind of people who don't really think things through before acting.

I hope the number will keep on growing until the "legit" votes make up for the fake ones.

[–] ampersandrew@lemmy.world 21 points 23 hours ago

About my lowest threshold for success is that this at least makes disclosures about what you're buying more prominent and restricts the ability for software licenses to just alter the deal and pray that they don't alter them further. Even better disclosures would make the raw deal you're getting become more poisonous before the point of sale. Especially as an American, I'm going to have wait a few years after any legislation goes through before I can trust online multiplayer games again.

[–] r00ty@kbin.life 19 points 23 hours ago

It's good to see. The UK one is still ticking upward too (133.5k/100k). It's been an impressive last minute push.

Now, we wait and see I guess. I expect nothing useful to come from the UK one, but at least we force them to respond again. Even if it is the same response.

The EU one, I really do hope something comes of it.

[–] nebulaone@lemmy.world 14 points 22 hours ago (1 children)
[–] Wizard_Pope@lemmy.world 8 points 21 hours ago

A whole melon indeed

[–] TheFrogThatFlies@lemmy.world 12 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

Yay! I'm one in a million!

Can we move for a Stop Killing People now!? :)

[–] cecilkorik@piefed.ca 3 points 17 hours ago

That's definitely a stretch goal. But at least if we can start by stopping them from killing something innocuous like games it shows that we still maybe have some power over them.

[–] SassyRamen@lemmy.world 7 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

Ich bin dabei 🙋🏼‍♂️

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›