this post was submitted on 01 Jul 2025
602 points (99.0% liked)

196

3766 readers
1712 users here now

Community Rules

You must post before you leave

Be nice. Assume others have good intent (within reason).

Block or ignore posts, comments, and users that irritate you in some way rather than engaging. Report if they are actually breaking community rules.

Use content warnings and/or mark as NSFW when appropriate. Most posts with content warnings likely need to be marked NSFW.

Most 196 posts are memes, shitposts, cute images, or even just recent things that happened, etc. There is no real theme, but try to avoid posts that are very inflammatory, offensive, very low quality, or very "off topic".

Bigotry is not allowed, this includes (but is not limited to): Homophobia, Transphobia, Racism, Sexism, Abelism, Classism, or discrimination based on things like Ethnicity, Nationality, Language, or Religion.

Avoid shilling for corporations, posting advertisements, or promoting exploitation of workers.

Proselytization, support, or defense of authoritarianism is not welcome. This includes but is not limited to: imperialism, nationalism, genocide denial, ethnic or racial supremacy, fascism, Nazism, Marxism-Leninism, Maoism, etc.

Avoid AI generated content.

Avoid misinformation.

Avoid incomprehensible posts.

No threats or personal attacks.

No spam.

Moderator Guidelines

Moderator Guidelines

  • Don’t be mean to users. Be gentle or neutral.
  • Most moderator actions which have a modlog message should include your username.
  • When in doubt about whether or not a user is problematic, send them a DM.
  • Don’t waste time debating/arguing with problematic users.
  • Assume the best, but don’t tolerate sealioning/just asking questions/concern trolling.
  • Ask another mod to take over cases you struggle with, if you get tired, or when things get personal.
  • Ask the other mods for advice when things get complicated.
  • Share everything you do in the mod matrix, both so several mods aren't unknowingly handling the same issues, but also so you can receive feedback on what you intend to do.
  • Don't rush mod actions. If a case doesn't need to be handled right away, consider taking a short break before getting to it. This is to say, cool down and make room for feedback.
  • Don’t perform too much moderation in the comments, except if you want a verdict to be public or to ask people to dial a convo down/stop. Single comment warnings are okay.
  • Send users concise DMs about verdicts about them, such as bans etc, except in cases where it is clear we don’t want them at all, such as obvious transphobes. No need to notify someone they haven’t been banned of course.
  • Explain to a user why their behavior is problematic and how it is distressing others rather than engage with whatever they are saying. Ask them to avoid this in the future and send them packing if they do not comply.
  • First warn users, then temp ban them, then finally perma ban them when they break the rules or act inappropriately. Skip steps if necessary.
  • Use neutral statements like “this statement can be considered transphobic” rather than “you are being transphobic”.
  • No large decisions or actions without community input (polls or meta posts f.ex.).
  • Large internal decisions (such as ousting a mod) might require a vote, needing more than 50% of the votes to pass. Also consider asking the community for feedback.
  • Remember you are a voluntary moderator. You don’t get paid. Take a break when you need one. Perhaps ask another moderator to step in if necessary.

founded 5 months ago
MODERATORS
top 41 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] yogurtwrong@lemmy.world 36 points 15 hours ago (1 children)
[–] SkyezOpen@lemmy.world 6 points 9 hours ago

Irrefutable proof that the nukes caused hentai.

[–] m4xie@lemmy.ca 73 points 22 hours ago (1 children)
[–] soooma@feddit.uk 1 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

Cool comic, doesn't apply here.

[–] crapwittyname@feddit.uk 19 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 12 hours ago) (2 children)

It's still relevant for England at least, there is a pretty close and probably casual relationship between population density and Brexit voting. Rural areas tended to vote Brexit, cities didn't.

[–] azertyfun@sh.itjust.works 1 points 7 hours ago

Relevant for England but not Scotland, Wales, or Northern Ireland.

A good metaphor for Brexit I guess.

[–] healthetank@lemmy.ca 11 points 17 hours ago (2 children)

Ah yes, the urban hotspots of.....Scotland?

[–] crapwittyname@feddit.uk 9 points 12 hours ago

relevant for ENGLAND at least

[–] Szyler@lemmy.world 10 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

Scotland has an additional effect of density of increased common sense

[–] funkless_eck@sh.itjust.works 1 points 8 hours ago

and skagheads that live in a bus stop. it's like a bell curve

[–] Numenor@lemmy.world 36 points 20 hours ago (2 children)

Cowelation does not imply causation

[–] SkunkWorkz@lemmy.world 13 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

Moo point, udder nonsense.

[–] NochMehrG@feddit.org 22 points 20 hours ago

„Cowelation does not imply cowsation.“ Was right there! Still great! 🤣

[–] WanderWisley@lemmy.world 27 points 22 hours ago (2 children)

There is also a correlation between lead paint and serial killers in America in the 60s and 70s as well as leaded gasoline.

[–] Trainguyrom@reddthat.com 3 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

There's an additional hypothesis that a lot of the violence in the 60s and 70s was also driven by people who grew up in broken homes with unhappy marriages that couldn't be ended

[–] Rebecca_Corndogs@lemmy.world 2 points 7 hours ago

I've also seen theories about the effects of untreated PTSD on the children of WWII vets.

[–] TheodorAlforno@feddit.org 22 points 19 hours ago

Lead indeed caused violent crime as it influences our nervous system and thus our behavior. It is a widely accepted hypothesis by now.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lead%E2%80%93crime_hypothesis?wprov=sfla1

[–] NigelFrobisher@aussie.zone 9 points 19 hours ago

Amazing how BSE knew and respected the modern border between England and Scotland perfectly.

[–] Linkyu@lemmy.blahaj.zone 71 points 1 day ago

the cows voted

[–] crazycraw@crazypeople.online 22 points 1 day ago

mis-steaks were made

[–] FelixCress@lemmy.world 31 points 1 day ago (4 children)

Please tell me it is real...

[–] koper@feddit.nl 93 points 1 day ago (4 children)

It's simply a correlation with population density. More rural areas tend to vote more conservative.

https://xkcd.com/1138/

[–] FundMECFSResearch@lemmy.blahaj.zone 17 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Not it isn’t. If it was london would be black and you’d see black dots for Ediburgh and Glasgow

[–] Bassman1805@lemmy.world 15 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The plot is an inverse of population density: rural areas have more exposure to cows, cities do not.

[–] FundMECFSResearch@lemmy.blahaj.zone 11 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Still isn’t, otherwise the whole of scotland would be black since thats by far the most rural bit of the UK.

[–] ScreamingFirehawk@feddit.uk 6 points 22 hours ago (2 children)

Given the clear line at the Scottish border I would say that data is missing for Scotland

[–] Weslee@lemmy.world 4 points 20 hours ago

I don't think so, Ireland is completely missing and NI is grey, like Scotland is

[–] MelodiousFunk@slrpnk.net 4 points 22 hours ago

The grey is labeled BSE-free areas, though there's enough jpeg in there to squint and make it say whatever.

[–] RadioFreeArabia@lemmy.world 2 points 18 hours ago

Scotland is mostly rural, is it not?

[–] TwoBeeSan@lemmy.world 10 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

This has always read to me as "when you're around a bunch of different people you realize how the same we are"

Eidunno. Curious what others think of that. It is very true, the rural and the conservatism.

[–] magnetosphere@fedia.io 19 points 1 day ago

I think that’s one of the big reasons conservatives hate college. When young people interact with people of different socioeconomic backgrounds, religious beliefs, etc, they realize that those people aren’t the two dimensional boogeymen that they’ve been made out to be. They begin to realize that blind hatred is the problem, not diversity.

[–] callouscomic@lemmy.zip 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

People are mindless idiots.

[–] Deceptichum@quokk.au 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] i_dont_want_to@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 10 hours ago

Then who raises the sheep?

[–] it_depends_man@lemmy.world 28 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Even if it wasn't a population density correlation, there are lots of totally unrelated correlations.

Someone made a fun website with them!

http://www.tylervigen.com/spurious-correlations

[–] Feathercrown@lemmy.world 16 points 22 hours ago

Hold on now, this one might not be so spurious...

[–] Taleya@aussie.zone 19 points 1 day ago

That site lost me when they started stuffing utterly unecessary AI generated art in there. Honestly, what the utter fuck.

[–] Smorty@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 18 hours ago

the site is really cool, im jus rlli confused bout why they put generated images.-.- like - after each element -.-,.,,.

thank u for sharin tho!

[–] 1rre@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 1 day ago

nah unfortunately not from the looks of things, there's some places which definitely had mad cow disease that aren't coloured, but I wouldn't be surprised if the actual map is still very correlated