this post was submitted on 30 Jun 2025
699 points (99.6% liked)

politics

24518 readers
2981 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

This analysis came out earlier this month, and it's the mother of all wake-up calls. Trump's "Big Beautiful Bill" would appropriate $200 billion to ICE, which the Cato Institute has called an "unimaginable sum." Some relevant quotes:

The Congressional Budget Office (CBO) estimates the bill will direct an astounding $168 billion of the budget to immigration and border law enforcement, and there is even more for agencies that indirectly support immigration law enforcement.

The $168 billion is, by itself, an unimaginable sum. Without H.R. 1, Congress had already appropriated twice as much money to America’s border police as all other federal law enforcement combined. In FY 2025, immigration and border enforcement accounted for at least two-thirds of all federal law enforcement.

In FY 2025—again, before H.R. 1—Congress allocated nearly $34 billion to immigration and border enforcement agencies. That’s 36 times more than what is provided for tax and financial crimes enforcement (IRS-Treasury), 21 times more than funding for firearms enforcement (ATF), 13 times more than drug enforcement (DEA), and 8 times more than the FBI budget to enforce effectively everything else. The level of border police spending is already so extreme that it has swamped nearly all other criminal law enforcement priorities for the federal government.

The House plans to distort this wildly out-of-whack law enforcement system beyond recognition. H.R. 1 appropriates $168 billion to agencies whose primary purpose is immigration enforcement. It adds $1.2 billion to all other law enforcement for the Secret Service. This sum comes on top of the $33 billion, meaning that if this bill passes, about $200 billion will be made available for immigration enforcement starting in FY 2025.

$200 billion dollars is equivalent to 1/5th of our entire military budget ($960 billion). It's more than Russia's entire military spending in 2024 ($149 billion). To say that Trump would be creating a 7th branch of the military operating on US soil would be neither an overstatement nor a conspiracy theory.

For context, this article was published by the Cato Institute, a libertarian think tank originally founded by Charles Koch (among others). The fact that these guys are ringing the alarm bell should be a warning unto itself. You can read the full text of the bill (H.R. 1) here.

https://archive.ph/pfuB6

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] bold_atlas@lemmy.world 3 points 28 minutes ago* (last edited 25 minutes ago)

All of which is going to be funneled directly into the pockets of Trump's tech bro friends via contracts with data companies like Palantir.

Acquire weapons. Melt the ice.

[–] Worthess@discuss.online 5 points 3 hours ago

There's still 50 million of us, $200 billion, what's that? 40k brownshirts?

[–] gandalf_der_12te@discuss.tchncs.de 15 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago)

Just for comparison: NASA got $25 billion per year for the last 10 years or so. source

[–] some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org 29 points 14 hours ago

Imagine if we allocated that much money to housing people. Ha, right?

[–] Grumpyleb@lemmus.org 35 points 17 hours ago (3 children)

Well done America, you had a pretty decent country with some major issues (healthcare, cost of living) but you've all decided you need a bit more racism and hate in your lives. Congratulations on your incoming authoritarianism.

[–] nBodyProblem@lemmy.world 6 points 2 hours ago

To be fair, right around 50% of us are vehemently opposed to this sort of thing. Far from all America

i can literally imagine an american sitting at the kitchen table and thinking "hmm, what do we need in our lives? more spice"

well, here's the bill.

[–] BrazenSigilos@ttrpg.network 20 points 17 hours ago (3 children)

The issue some of us take with that is no, we did not all decide we needed more racism and hate. In fact, more and more evidence is being found that shows the entire thing was rigged, and the true majority decision was not acknowledged by the folks who had mostly been behind the scenes before.

[–] Grumpyleb@lemmus.org 20 points 16 hours ago (2 children)

America has been sliding further and futher away from being a democracy for decades, eroding rights and corporate lobbys have put business over people, he was elected TWICE even if there was voter rigging. The democratic party is dead and your political system is broken. The Heritage foundation has long been planning this and none of this was a secret. While YOU may note have voted for this, this is what the face of America is to us foreigners,

[–] misteloct@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 3 hours ago

Then you're only looking at one side of the coin and saying it's double sided.

america is truly an exceptional place, just not the kind of exception that i'd like to ever encounter

[–] ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca 8 points 16 hours ago

Trump said it was rigged when he won (Elon fixed the machines in Penn)

What violence against him have you seen from these presumed non-supporters?

[–] null_dot@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 15 hours ago

Sure ok but that's pretty meaningless at this juncture.

Rigged machines aren't going to save us

[–] plyth@feddit.org 20 points 16 hours ago

7th branch of the military operating on US soil

Seventh National Army

It's just a pun. Nothing to worry about.

[–] aesthelete@lemmy.world 12 points 16 hours ago

Can't have food for starving infants but we'll spend a fifth a trillion on the masked, jeaned gestapo to kick the American gulag and genocide project into high gear.

[–] rottingleaf@lemmy.world 6 points 15 hours ago

For context, this article was published by the Cato Institute, a libertarian think tank originally founded by Charles Koch (among others). The fact that these guys are ringing the alarm bell should be a warning unto itself. You can read the full text of the bill (H.R. 1) here.

I don't think it should be a warning into itself. They basically provide a libertarian view on everything which doesn't seem to be augmented by real world politics. I've noticed they do that in many situations, some mostly unnoticed by most people in western countries, and some politically heated. That's a very good commendation IMHO, that they are still doing what they were supposed to do.

About the thing itself - border police also seems to be one military structure in your country relatively less accountable than those 3-letter agencies wearing black and fighting aliens and loudly breathing in our phone calls.

And it's possible that Trump wants to have it as his own terror force, like some Gypsy baron gone dictator.

[–] DeathByBigSad@sh.itjust.works 16 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

"Responsible Spending" 🤣

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Ithral@lemmy.blahaj.zone 6 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

For context, this article was published by the Cato Institute, a libertarian think tank originally founded by Charles Koch (among others). The fact that these guys are ringing the alarm bell should be a warning unto itself.

https://lp.org/platform-page/ section 3.4 outlines a loose border policy. The US Libertarians may have diverged from most global Libertarian thought, but while shy of open borders, borders aren't something any Libertarian is fond of.

[–] rottingleaf@lemmy.world 2 points 15 hours ago* (last edited 15 hours ago)

Well, ancap world is basically like a cyberpunk dystopia, except turned into an utopia by a few rules.

And since cyberpunk dystopia we already live in and it's not optional, maybe ancap deserves a second chance, due to being better prepared for it? Ple-ease, ple-ease

Sorry.

(And technically one can also make a case for the spiral of humanity being again over the same place on the ground as in Marx times, thus marxism also surprisingly having become relevant.)

[–] salacious_coaster@infosec.pub 236 points 1 day ago (6 children)

Spoiler alert: they're going to enforce a lot more than immigration.

[–] breecher@sh.itjust.works 20 points 21 hours ago

Yeah, that is SS funding money, complete with a Waffen SS branch.

[–] SnotFlickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone 142 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

If ICE was a military, it would be the third most funded military in the world with this budget. Right behind US and China and about $50 billion more than Russia.

We are looking at concentration camps for real.

[–] MisterFrog@lemmy.world 14 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

I feel like what the rest of the world doesn't understand (I am from the "rest of the world), is that the USA is VASTLY more powerful than the Nazis ever were. Barely any country is sounding the alarm seriously. Just "oh we're concerned about what's happening".

We are truly fucked.

And we're under the US' thumb (Australia).

At least we're majority white...... maybe that'll keep us safe, temporarily.

I hate this timeline, so very much.

[–] 1SimpleTailor@startrek.website 4 points 9 hours ago

I think (and hope) that one key difference here is that the US is much more divided politically and culturally then Nazi Germany was. At least right now, there is no way the US declares a war of aggression against a former Ally and doesn't fall into Civil War. It will take a hell of a lot of internal suppression for that to change, the act of which will likely ignite the Civil War itself.

My hope is that the next few years will be less "What if the Nazi's controlled the most powerful nation in history?" and more "What if Francisco Franco controlled the most powerful nation is history?"

Europe and China likely have time to prepare, and they really fucking need to. If they're smart they're already covertly looking into ways to arm and fund internal opposition in America.

[–] pelespirit@sh.itjust.works 64 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] andros_rex@lemmy.world 6 points 15 hours ago

I’ve seen MAGAs post gleeful memes at the idea of immigrants being eaten by alligators. It’s sick.

[–] NotAGamer@lemmy.org 69 points 1 day ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Etterra@discuss.online 64 points 1 day ago (6 children)

But nothing for healthcare, of course. That would be communism, or some such bullshit.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] zildjiandrummer1@lemmy.world 91 points 1 day ago (3 children)

MAGA is building its own secret police SS force. What a surprise that absolutely no one could see coming /s.

[–] rottingleaf@lemmy.world 2 points 15 hours ago

I dunno, "secret" doesn't seem to be exactly the word.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Stern@lemmy.world 17 points 1 day ago

https://www.stripes.com/branches/marine_corps/2025-06-26/marines-budget-2026-18253650.html

The [Marines] $57.2 billion budget request is part of the Navy’s $292.2 billion overall proposed spending plan for fiscal 2026, which begins Oct. 1. The budget request reflects a more than 6% increase from the 2025 request.

More then three times the budget of the Marines.

[–] notso@feddit.org 13 points 1 day ago

Well, those Florida swamp death camps won't pay for themselves.

[–] skozzii@lemmy.ca 74 points 1 day ago (6 children)

The Democrats are already drafting up a cutting, sternly worded letter.

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›