this post was submitted on 26 Jun 2025
985 points (99.4% liked)

Science Memes

15552 readers
3096 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 22 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] voytrekk@sopuli.xyz 1 points 3 days ago

This has always been my point for climate deniers/skeptics. Making these changes will have noticeable effects outside of just reducing green house gases. Cleaner air and energy independence are concrete benefits that cannot be denied.

[–] hitstun@fedia.io 113 points 1 week ago (1 children)

This is Joel Pett's cartoon for the USA Today on December 13, 2009. It's the highlight of his career, and yet still it hasn't reached the people who need to see it most.

[–] zedgeist@lemmy.world 22 points 1 week ago

Thanks for adding context

[–] msprout@lemmy.world 87 points 1 week ago (4 children)

I think about this comic probably once a week at this point. I don't know if anyone will ever be able to boil the problem down any further than what's here — "but what if we make a better world for nothing?"

Unfortunately I have tried to show this to people, or use the line that illustrates it, and the gist of the general response is "my comfort comes before our safety."

[–] OhStopYellingAtMe@lemmy.world 68 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Yeah this comic is perfectly accurate, plus the one with the man in the business suit, talking to some children around a campfire in a post-apocalyptic setting, saying “yes the world was destroyed, but for a beautiful moment in time we made a lot of value for it shareholders.”

EDIT - this one:

[–] PineRune@lemmy.world 24 points 1 week ago

"But it's not profitable." -people who wouldn't profit off it anyway, on any issue about socialism.

[–] WanderingThoughts@europe.pub 23 points 1 week ago

my comfort comes before our safety.

Then the billionaire says the same and crushes their lives.

[–] Spacehooks@reddthat.com 5 points 1 week ago

"Comfort means nothing without safety. "

Or maybe

"you won't stay comfortable long that way."

[–] Nurse_Robot@lemmy.world 43 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Very old, still relevant. (Actually, more relevant)

[–] Mycatiskai@lemmy.ca 30 points 1 week ago (3 children)

We wouldn't want to make the world better, there isn't anything in it for the shareholders.

[–] whostosay@lemmy.world 12 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

The shittiest part of this is that they have the most to gain, they're just too godamn stupid to realize it.

[–] magic_lobster_party@fedia.io 12 points 1 week ago (2 children)

They only care about short term growth. They don’t care about if the growth is unsustainable in the long term.

This year’s numbers must be better than last year’s numbers.

[–] SaharaMaleikuhm@feddit.org 3 points 1 week ago

We would be so much better off without capitalism and religion.

[–] whostosay@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago

For sure, we could all be so much more than this though.

It's a godamn shame.

[–] mgnome@piefed.social 6 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I'm more than sure that climate change will negatively impact the economy.

So I'd just say that there is something for shareholders (not to mention investment opportunities in green technologies), it's just that some people greedy shits who don't think about what happens in future.

[–] whostosay@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago

Why would you even type this? What does it have to do with the next quarters earnings?

[–] BurgerBaron@piefed.ca 1 points 1 week ago

Self described most intelligent species.

Maybe the rare few who actually drag this suicidal group-think and cowed species kicking and screaming into the future very seldomly. Yet the masses will take credit for their efforts the same way a billionaire takes credit for what the workers do simply because they own the fruits of their labor.

[–] ZILtoid1991@lemmy.world 9 points 1 week ago (1 children)

"What if we get rid of cars with a really sick revving sound?"

[–] reallykindasorta@slrpnk.net 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

We could probably recreate the sound without burning gas, the newer electric cars sound like alien ships which is definitely a different vibe

[–] 18107@aussie.zone 7 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Run this software and connect the output to the electric car motor. You can now have the full experience of any engine you want while burning no fuel.

https://store.steampowered.com/app/2381620/Steam_Engine_Simulator/

Proof of concept: https://youtu.be/4U41OxHiqI8

[–] GuyDudeman@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago

My favorite political cartoon of all time!

Many such cases