this post was submitted on 02 Jun 2025
67 points (98.6% liked)

Casual Conversation

3411 readers
564 users here now

Share a story, ask a question, or start a conversation about (almost) anything you desire. Maybe you'll make some friends in the process.


RULES

  1. Be respectful: no harassment, hate speech, bigotry, and/or trolling.
  2. Encourage conversation in your OP. This means including heavily implicative subject matter when you can and also engaging in your thread when possible.
  3. Avoid controversial topics (e.g. politics or societal debates).
  4. Stay calm: Don’t post angry or to vent or complain. We are a place where everyone can forget about their everyday or not so everyday worries for a moment. Venting, complaining, or posting from a place of anger or resentment doesn't fit the atmosphere we try to foster at all. Feel free to post those on !goodoffmychest@lemmy.world
  5. Keep it clean and SFW
  6. No solicitation such as ads, promotional content, spam, surveys etc.

Casual conversation communities:

Related discussion-focused communities

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] frenchfryenjoyer@lemmings.world 1 points 5 hours ago

Mario Kart World and that new Donkey Kong game. everything about the Switch 2 looks underwhelming

[–] Pyr_Pressure@lemmy.ca 2 points 8 hours ago

Celebrities

I couldn't care less about any of them, I don't understand why people follow them on social media or read gossip about their love lives.

Makes zero sense to me

[–] blarth@thelemmy.club 3 points 10 hours ago

Souls games.

Ed Sheeran.

In-N-Out.

[–] BuboScandiacus@mander.xyz 1 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago)

Gen alpha stuff

[–] aquinteros@lemmy.world 1 points 11 hours ago
[–] Pnut@lemm.ee 17 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Tik Tok. It's just vine but no one is funny. How many videos of people just driving their cars with some nonsense text overlaid, like, how many hundreds of that are needed? How are you going to stand out? It's just a way for the uncreative to take part in creativity. Which they aren't.

[–] TheFriar@lemm.ee 2 points 12 hours ago

Just like the fast food thing, TikTok is literally addictive. It’s the new breed of addictive tech. It’s the fentanyl of tech.

[–] Krudler@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Fast food.

I'm not saying there's exactly "hype" but it seems to have a permanent grasp on the minds of chronic users.

In 2025, with our knowledge of nutrition, people are still denying that it's basically hot candy disguised as food... people are still arguing that it's nutritional enough that is okay to eat.

No, it's the equivalent of cigarettes. Stop eating that shit, recognize it for what it is: addictive poison.

[–] TheFriar@lemm.ee 1 points 12 hours ago

In the same way that sugar/candy is physically addictive, fast food has been proven to have the same physiological effects. It’s literally an addiction.

[–] MoonRaven@feddit.nl 13 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Blockchain. I've always seen it as a solution looking g for a problem. And I'm a 12+ experienced software developer now.

[–] burgerchurgarr@lemmus.org 0 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago)

Meh I think the decentralization is a pretty nice use case actually. It’s great that no one can shut it down and no centralized entity can just decide that your money is gone now (for cryptocurrencies).

Look at Monero. Since it's almost impossible to track governments are actually trying to ban it but they can’t shut it down because anyone can just spin up a node and there’s nothing any government can do about it except banning it from exchanges. I think that’s pretty neat, although the environmental cost for this technology together with LLMs are absolutely crazy

[–] ZDL@ttrpg.network 4 points 1 day ago

My SO has long rants about blockchain and the people who think it is useful. My own, completely non-technical, criticism is "so you're saying privacy is enhanced by putting every transaction ever onto a permanent, unalterable public ledger?"

[–] Manifish_Destiny@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

The only real use for the block chain is tracking stocks to prevent illegal shortselling.

So it will never ever ever get used for that purpose.

Obligatory fuck citadel.

[–] ddash@lemmy.dbzer0.com 18 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Balatro.

Almost every single mention of it I see online makes it sound like the most freaking addictive drug. Any of you seen that Star Trek TNG episode where this weird addictive headset game takes over the Enterprise? Just like that.

It's probably a good game, but all those posts feel really off putting to me.

[–] ReeferPirate@lemy.lol 3 points 18 hours ago

Big number go up, get brain drug dose. not much more to it than that.

[–] BlueMagma@sh.itjust.works 8 points 1 day ago (2 children)

It's a really fun game. People exaggerate the "addictive" aspect because.. you know.. "internet"

[–] Enkers@sh.itjust.works 1 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago)

Y'know, while I also think it's exaggerated, there's definitely some truth to it. I was playing it on my phone while my friend's kids were watching, and they incessantly tried to get me to pick opening packs over any other game mechanic.

I think it definitely does abuse that "loot box opening" dopamine pathway a little too well in a perhaps a less than healthy sort of way, even if it doesn't cost you any real money.

So while it is a very good deck building strategy game, I totally get the reason it has the reputation it does.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Pnut@lemm.ee 3 points 1 day ago

I don't like that kind of game. I didn't like Balatro. I'm more into realism and simulation though. I had no idea why all of my favourite sites couldn't stop talking about it. Honestly, I think standards have fallen a lot further than we thought. Again though. I'm surviving until the release of Elder Scrolls 6. Balatro was never really on my radar.

[–] RedditAdminsSuckIt@lemmy.world 49 points 2 days ago (4 children)

Oh god, I feel like I’m going to be massacred.

K-pop

[–] TimewornTraveler@lemm.ee 5 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 12 hours ago)

hey, you're valid... I'm from Korea and it's crazy seeing how people drool over kpop nowdays. no attention for the actual good music, the korean rock and hip hop and funk and jazz and so on... just the corporate boybands.

It's the same shit that's popular in the US. manufactured popularity. we could talk about all the factors about how they pulled it off, but who cares, it's a bunch of shitty music created by desperate people selling their souls to rapists who prey on modern social isolation to sell empty fantasies to the masses.

that's the point of the music! you should be proud to dislike it. now go listen to something good, like Jaurim (자우림)

[–] rumschlumpel@feddit.org 22 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (8 children)

Isn't it basically the same as back when western boybands were popular, just with more internet? I suppose I don't quite get those, either, but it's not that hard to figure out why these groups are so appealing to many girls and women.

load more comments (8 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] angelmountain@feddit.nl 39 points 2 days ago (17 children)

Pick-up trucks for anyone that's not a farmer, construction worker or dirtbike rider.

They are so dumb and impractical for normal driving. I don't get it.

I believe there was some tax-benefit for them in the US at some point..? Then it makes a tiny bit if sense i guess.

But what's even dumber: cross-overs. Worst of both worlds.

[–] shalafi@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago

Part of it was EPA regulations fucking up small trucks. Another part is that they're safer for the occupants, deadlier for everyone else. And then there's general machismo.

[–] Blackout@fedia.io 14 points 2 days ago

I love my small car but it's getting impossible to drive anymore when the LED headlights of these trucks are literally at my eye level blinding everything. They are a danger and the only way out it seems is to join them and get above the lights.

load more comments (15 replies)
[–] flamingo_pinyata@sopuli.xyz 25 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (5 children)

Taylor Swift. I actually like her music. I also understand that hardcore fans will exist for every artist. But Swifties take it to another level. I'm lowkey impressed by that fandom, but don't get it.

[–] dumples@midwest.social 2 points 20 hours ago

You know how people who are into Q-Anon and Pizza-gate look at strange symbols and odd numerology to find strange connections to prove whatever crazy thing they believe. Taylor Swift like to release albums, singles and tours using favorite numbers, hidden symbols and hints in her other songs. So it fits that section of the internet who love to analyze to death things to find clues. Since she is so prolific there is enough material for her to hide these Easter eggs to generate endless conspiracies about when things are released. Since she does drop hints it makes sense that people love to find them. Its like a puzzle-game mixed with a conspiracy theory mixed with a "viral marketing campaign" all in one. And instead of unraveling the fabric of democracy she release music people like.

[–] shalafi@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago

I like her music when I hear it, but don't seek it out. From what I gather she really speaks to women, they get her in ways I (male) would not relate to. She strikes me as moral and doesn't have skeletons in the closet or any weird behavior one would expect from someone that rich and famous. As dad would have said, "That's a stand-up woman!"

She knows how to sell herself, which I find an admirable and difficult trait. I feel I'm 10x more confident than the people that post around here and she's 100x more confident that I. And it's not bullshit, unearned confidence a la Senior Musk.

And who doesn't love how she fucked the record companies over at their own game? Knowing her own worth changed the industry.

Doesn't hurt that she's almost ethereally pretty. :)

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] silverchase@sh.itjust.works 9 points 1 day ago (8 children)

Vinyl records.

If you're rejecting online music streaming and wanting music in physical form, CDs look a lot more practical. CDs are smaller, less delicate, and don't physically degrade every time you play them. CD playback hardware needs essentially zero maintenance and is crazy cheap still.

Could it be for nostalgia? But I've seen people younger than peak vinyl get into music on records. They wouldn't have any nostalgia for vinyl.

Is it for the sound quality? But I've seen chiptune albums available on records! It would be truer to the music to load it onto a real Game Boy or something.

[–] dumples@midwest.social 4 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

The reason I like vinyl is how slow and deliberate it is compared to other mediums. If I want to play a record I have a limited curated selection which I purchased with a specific use case. These are all played in my living room and are generally slower and relaxing type music. If I want to play a record I will need to start at the beginning and typically commit to hearing the entire thing in its entirety. Each side I have to choose to continue which slows down the process. I can't skip ahead to the songs I like and it doesn't automatically play anything once its done. Its slow and has a large physical object which I enjoy.

If I used CDs I could skip to whatever song I like or have it automatically play the next CD. With a multi-disc changer I wouldn't have to choose what I want to hear each time. I have CDs which I use in my car for a different use case which is to listen to when the radio is being annoying.

[–] ILikeTraaaains@lemmy.world 1 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago) (1 children)

This exactly.

It’s the ceremonial steps that precedes the listening experience that adds flavour to the enjoyment.

If I want to just listen music and do other things I just use Apple Music + AirPods/Soundbar, but if I want to listen a certain album and make the experience more active, I use the record player.

My music collection on vinyl is curated since each album involves a higher cost.

There is also my fascination on analog things, I have an automatic turntable and love the orchestra of mechanical sounds from all the internal components.

Edit: Forgot to mention that on streaming platforms sometimes the only version available is a remastered version that was rereleased on CD that fucked the dynamic range during the loudness war or is an edit of the original one.

[–] dumples@midwest.social 1 points 2 hours ago

It’s the ceremonial steps that precedes the listening experience that adds flavour to the enjoyment.

Exactly. Its a ritual for the listening experience. If I had to add up the hours of listening to Vinyl vs streaming, streaming would win hands down. But I love the vinyl when I use it which is usually an experience. We do a lot of vinyl around the holidays since we spend a lot of time in my living room relaxing. Which adds to the experience

[–] Psythik@lemm.ee 3 points 20 hours ago

The reason the people choose vinyl is because of its limitations. CD has a larger dynamic range, but because it's fully digital, producers can abuse that fact and make an extremely loud and dynamically compressed record and the CD will play just fine.

If you tried doing that on vinyl, the needle would fly off the record. So thanks to this physical limitation, people who produce for vinyl are forced to make a quieter, more dynamic record. It's less fatiguing on the ears, and if you want a louder record, you can simply turn up the volume.

[–] Owljfien@lemm.ee 8 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

I like vinyl for it being big enough to be somewhat like a poster. I'm hoping to eventually gave a vinyl wall when I have my own place

I'm 30 so CDs were well and truly widespread during my formative years so it's not nostalgia for me

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] ZDL@ttrpg.network 28 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (5 children)

Bacon.

I mean I get it. We studied the marketing campaign that led to baconmania in class. It's one of the greatest marketing campaigns of all time, right up there with "A Diamond is Forever" from de Beers.

However in the end, bacon is … OK. But there's many better ways to use pork bellies than turning them into bacon. Especially the over-processed stuff that's used on foods in restaurants.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] Opinionhaver@feddit.uk 22 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I mean… pretty much anything that gets hyped. For me, hype is one of the most reliable signals that I’m not going to be into something. That said, I’ll admit that the hype itself often keeps me from even giving things a fair chance. So it’s not that I’ve disliked everything that’s been hyped, but more that the ones I did try and didn’t enjoy made me even less likely to bother with the rest.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›