this post was submitted on 22 May 2025
158 points (98.8% liked)

News

38590 readers
1880 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil

Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.

2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.

Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.

3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.

Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.

4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.

Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.

5. Only recent news is allowed.

Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.

6. All posts must be news articles.

No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.

7. No duplicate posts.

If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.

8. Misinformation is prohibited.

Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.

9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.

All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.

10. Don't copy entire article in your post body

For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
JonsJava@lemmy.world
gedaliyah@lemmy.world
little_cow@lemmy.world
jeffw@lemmy.world
enu@lemmy.world
rjc@lemmy.world
Tenthrow@lemmy.world
158
A Gun Deemed Too Dangerous for Cops, But Fine for Civilians: Police are reselling their SIG Sauer P320 pistols — alleged in multiple lawsuits to fire without the trigger being pulled — to the public (www.motherjones.com)
submitted 1 year ago by gAlienLifeform@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world
15 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

Archived at https://web.archive.org/web/20250522120645/https://www.motherjones.com/politics/2025/05/a-gun-deemed-too-dangerous-for-cops-but-fine-for-civilians/

top 15 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 57 points 1 year ago (3 children)

It was possible but only if dropped and landing at a very specific angle and hitting concrete...

The main problem is when cops hear a new excuse, they can't wait to try it out

So when this became news, every negligent discharge by a cop (they're very frequent) was blamed on this.

Shit like this:

Shortly after dark one day in September 2022, police officers Yang Lee and Charles Laskey-Castle arrived on Milwaukee’s west side to investigate a car abandoned on the sidewalk. Lee knelt to examine the driver’s side floorboard as Laskey-Castle stood behind him. Then Lee rose — and his holstered gun fired a bullet into his partner’s leg.

Has never been able to be reproduced intentionally.

Here's an article and body cam footage:

https://www.wisn.com/article/video-shows-unintended-shooting-injuring-milwaukee-officer/45015940

Sig says the only way it could have happened was if something snagged the trigger, and yeah...

Lots of people have spent a lot of time trying to make the p320 go off on its own like cops kept saying. And like I said the only way that was reproducible was a very specific angle drop on something as hard as concrete.

[–] ProdigalFrog@slrpnk.net 17 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Forgotten Weapons put out an interesting theory of Stacked Tolerances being the culprit.

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=3iWVs2uD1XY

[–] baldingpudenda@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago

Praise gun jesus.

Also the first drop fires were because the trigger was heavy and it's inertia was enough to "pull" the trigger as this short shows. There was a voluntary free upgrade to the more expensive, but lighter trigger. I've always wanted a SIG, but, unless I find a great price on a p229, I'm going to get an M&P 2.0.

[–] gAlienLifeform@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Oof, geeze, this article was my first exposure to this issue and I hadn't considered this, but between a for profit business lying to avoid product liability lawsuits (which they probably wouldn't face anyway because court decisions have made them basically immune) and police officers lying to avoid being held accountable for their actions (which they probably wouldn't face anyway because etc.) I could believe either scenario. Honestly it's probably both at the same time.

e; Sometimes I start a comment and forget where when I come back to it

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 14 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Honestly it’s probably both at the same time.

The drops were 100% real, and an unacceptable flaw that was/is definitely a liability issue for Sig... (Edited to add: this issue was just on the very first ones and has since been fixed, but the required drop to make it happen was slightly out of spec for what is normally tested for. Like I think it would pass the standard test, but the test height plus an inch or two failed?)

But while this specific one sounds rare, a gun going off in their holster isn't really that rare and happens with loads of brands of guns.

Cops are strapped all day and "open carry" where the holster isn't just exposed it's on a cluttered belt with a bunch of other stuff.

Stuff falls in the holster and moving around can apply pressure which pulls the trigger.

After, the cop will likely see the object, and just discard it to avoid blame.

Like I said, a shit ton of people both involved and not involved did everything possible to try and make stuff like cops were claiming happen in a controlled environment, no one, not even police departments, could replicate it.

This was huge news at the time in the gun community

[–] Carmakazi@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

While blaming cops is an attractive conclusion, I wouldn't straight away give SIG the benefit of the doubt when they are basically saying "we investigated ourselves and found no wrongdoing." They have been very cagey about the whole affair from the beginning, which should be expected from a corporation on the brink of being liable of a catastrophic fuckup.

Not only have they have sold hundreds of thousands if not millions of these pistols to the public, it has been adopted as the service pistol of every US military branch. If they lose a suit and are forced to start a recall, it could very possibly sink them as a company.

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

It's not just Sig saying that...

No one, not even cops, can get stuff like this to replicate, even with the exact same guns that supposedly already did this.

People have looked into this before this article was written

[–] Arsecroft@lemmy.sdf.org 34 points 1 year ago

rooty tooty drop to shooty

11608

[–] deadkennedy@lemm.ee 28 points 1 year ago (2 children)

for what it’s worth, this issue is well known within the gun community and is a large sore spot for Sig enthusiasts.

it’s common place to point out this issue any time a listing for these appears in forums etc

[–] gAlienLifeform@lemmy.world 20 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

Good that people are doing that, but I don't think that excuses Sig. Like, if Nerf sold a gun that discharged accidentally they'd probably eat a product liability lawsuit over it, I don't know why a firearms manufacturer should get a pass.

[–] deadkennedy@lemm.ee 8 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

do not take anything i’ve said as any indication that Sig should get a pass.

I shoot Glock because it’s the firearm i have. i’m not into brand fanboyism

The knowledgeable people in the community do try to dissuade people from purchasing this model.

[–] grrgyle@slrpnk.net 15 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

fire without trigger being pulled

a large sore spot for Sig enthusiasts.

…

[–] Reverendender@sh.itjust.works 13 points 1 year ago

That seems like one of the last features anyone would want in a gun

[–] ssroxnak@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago

The SIG P320 requires too much training and safety knowledge for the average civilian cop to use. Other non cop civilians though? I'm sure most will be fine.