this post was submitted on 05 May 2025
685 points (99.0% liked)

Cyberstuck

1089 readers
1 users here now

A place to post your Cybertruck fails! We're here to make fun of this hunk of shit and throw as much shade as we can to that garbage bag of a human elon.

No doxxing No slurs No racism And no fucking nazis!

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
all 47 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] DaddleDew@lemmy.world 156 points 1 year ago (2 children)

The YouTuber EngineeringExplained also explained how although the cybertruck complies with the requirements for its advertised tow rating, this tow rating system is vastly inadequate for the real world and all other manufacturers overbuild the crap out of their trucks because they know that.

This is why cybertrucks are known to literally rip their frames apart while towing what they are technically rated for.

[–] Rubisco@slrpnk.net 48 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)
[–] DogWater@lemmy.world 24 points 1 year ago

Engineering explained is an excellent YouTube channel.

He also debunked the claim that the cybertruck won a drag race vs a 911 while towing a 911

[–] DaddleDew@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago
[–] LH0ezVT@sh.itjust.works 10 points 1 year ago

Wait, so every car manufacturer has already identified the problem decades ago, decided that bad press is worse than a few more dollars, and fixed it? Except the disruptive genius who knows everything? Nice.

[–] ohulancutash@feddit.uk 61 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Looks more like a rocket engine

[–] walden@sub.wetshaving.social 33 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Yep, an unfortunate typo. A jet engine of that size would be more impressive because they weigh more.

[–] Tja@programming.dev 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That's not a typo, that's a good old mistake. If they wrote "roket engine" it would be a typo.

[–] walden@sub.wetshaving.social 2 points 1 year ago

Ha that's funny, I could have sworn I wrote "mistake", because I had the same thought. Oops

[–] markovs_gun@lemmy.world 42 points 1 year ago (2 children)

FYI according to CPI inflation $2,500 in 1972 is worth about $19,000 today. Based on a comparison of median individual income that would be similar to about $25,000. Either way, the truck cost about the same as a Honda Civic does today.

[–] ikidd@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I paid less for my first house in 1994 than a cybertruck costs today, in current dollars.

Vehicles are insanely expensive in real dollars today.

[–] markovs_gun@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It's more that they're way bigger and more complicated now. A simple vehicle is still pretty much the same as I showed in my comment,

[–] Swedneck@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 1 year ago

the car market, especially in america, is completely fucked beyond saving. EVERYTHING is gargantuan and lethal.

in a sane world most people should only be driving small electric moped cars.

[–] PanArab@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I don’t think you can even get a Chevrolet Colorado for that price. If only Chinese pickups were available in the US.

[–] markovs_gun@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The issue is more a market issue than anything. People prefer to buy giant trucks instead of reasonable ones.

[–] PanArab@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago

In the US you are mostly true. The Maverick and Santa Cruz shows there’s a market for sensible pickup trucks but it is relatively small.

[–] skisnow@lemmy.ca 26 points 1 year ago

Continued astonishment at how consistently and repeatedly they self-own with stunts like this. Humiliation fetish is the only explanation.

[–] Lemmyoutofhere@lemmy.ca 24 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)
[–] LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.dbzer0.com 43 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

The Mini Cooper EV pulled a plane not long ago, it's all for show.

[–] GluWu@lemm.ee 42 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Single humans pull planes all the time as strong man stunts

[–] veroxii@aussie.zone 19 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Planes are super light or how else would they float off into the air to fly? /s

[–] Tja@programming.dev 4 points 1 year ago

That have hollow bones!

[–] LeFrog@discuss.tchncs.de 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I think you missed the !:

![](https://www.digitaltrends.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/10/TundraTowsEndeavour004.jpg)

[–] Lemmyoutofhere@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 year ago
[–] Tikiporch@lemmy.world 23 points 1 year ago

Considering what usually tows these things around, it's kind of a weak flex.

[–] invertedspear@lemm.ee 17 points 1 year ago (1 children)

In either case, how impressive is this really? If you balance the load properly to keep the tongue weight within spec, all you’re then doing is overcoming inertia and the friction of the wheels. What is the force to overcome those in either picture?

[–] takenaps@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The magnitude of the friction on the tires is still dependent on the load so would be hard to say without crunching the numbers.. but ya I agree with u, its probably much less impressive than it appears, which is all that really matters w demos like this

[–] baldingpudenda@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

There was also a demo of a cyberpunk pulling a train. I think it was practical engineering on YouTube. He then goes on to explain how little it actually takes to break fiction, why there's slack so you only pull one cart in the beginning and get inertia to do a lot of the work. It basically called out the stupid demo, and went on to show why trains are awesome.

[–] lettruthout@lemmy.world 16 points 1 year ago

We’re sure that the engine isn’t pushing the Cybertruck?

[–] Hupf@feddit.org 14 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Of course a plane would be super light, how else could it fly?

[–] JoeDyrt@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 year ago

Empty Weight of a Boeing 747 is 325,660–336,870 lb. (wiki)

It carries 4 turbo-fan engines, each of which weighs approximately 12,000 lbs. (also wiki)

So the 747 weighs at least 27 times heavier than one engine, on average. ( iOS calc)

[–] noughtnaut@lemmy.world 14 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

A giant thank you for reminding me of the now-ancient first-ever viral video - 405

[–] Doctor_Satan@lemm.ee 3 points 1 year ago

The effects still hold up. Better than a lot of big budget movies of that era, even.

[–] Pnut@lemm.ee 11 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It was a bit before my time but my cousin pointed this out to me a few years ago. Truck ads were absolutely nuts back in the 80s. They 100% destroyed every one that was in the commercials.

[–] vivendi@programming.dev 2 points 1 year ago

INDEPENDENT

FRONT

SUSPENSION

[–] 2910000@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago

I just watched the 1972 ad.
It's weird they used a mechanical grating sound in their background music

[–] The_Che_Banana@beehaw.org 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

19, 126 in today's Trumpbux

[–] Ledericas@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

looks like the warhead of icbm, hes delivering to putins planes.

[–] HugeNerd@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 year ago
  1. That's an engine, the other end of an ICBM
  2. Doesn't Russia already have their own warheads? You know, since they're such a global constant threat?
  3. Is there anything going on in the world that doesn't involve Russia according to you?
  4. Did you check under your bed? Behind your couch? In your closet? You know, for mind-control devices, etc?