this post was submitted on 29 Apr 2025
447 points (99.3% liked)

News

38327 readers
2043 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The remarkable campaign was upended by a backlash against Donald Trump, which sparked a stunning liberal resurgence.

Canada’s conservative leader lost his own seat in Monday’s election to cap off a stunning electoral meltdown that saw the Liberal Party rise from the polling doldrums to secure victory.

Pierre Poilievre, who faced off against Mark Carney and the incumbent center-left Liberals, lost his seat in rural Ottawa to Liberal candidate Bruce Fanjoy, national broadcaster CBC reported.

Poilievre first won the seat in 2004 and held it for two decades. Despite the massive swing against him in Carleton, he signaled to supporters Tuesday morning that he would stay on as leader of the Conservatives — though at that point CBC had not yet projected his defeat.

all 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] fluffykittycat@slrpnk.net 113 points 1 year ago (4 children)

I find it really fucking hilarious he lost his own seat. The auction seems like it went well for canada. I wonder who the Liberals are going to form a coalition with

[–] takeda@lemm.ee 31 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

From yesterday's reports it looked like they won majority, so technically they don't need to form a coalition?

Edit: looks like they don't have majority and still need a coalition.

[–] Darkassassin07@lemmy.ca 36 points 1 year ago (6 children)
[–] Atelopus-zeteki@fedia.io 35 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I hope that works out well. Coalitions, cooperation seems best.

[–] assaultpotato@sh.itjust.works 37 points 1 year ago

In ordinary circumstances I agree but with an external threat I kind of wish it was a majority.

At this point I hope they form government with NDP, and NDP agrees to not interfere with foreign policy at all but get concessions domestically, which is probably the best outcome of this election for Canada overall. Hopefully the number of seats that went Con off of vote splits for both NDP and Liberal actually causes voting reform to happen.

[–] corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca 5 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Best for Canada, but typically fall apart after about a year. We'll be at the polls again in 2026, and that's really not enough time to teach the tiktok generation about caring for others and why hate is bad.

[–] Brunbrun6766@lemmy.world 19 points 1 year ago

Talking down to them and playing the generational differences card isn't going to help at all. Plenty of old fucks, mid life fucks, and young fucks that need education in this not JUST the youngest of voters.

[–] kent_eh@lemmy.ca 8 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

but typically fall apart after about a year.

The last minority survived for almost 4 years.

Until the Trump Threat is neutralized (or at least muted) the BQ has common interests with the Liberals, so they could provide the needed votes to keep the government going.

And the NDP has no appetite (or budget) for another election in the near future, so they also have some incentive to play nice - and may even be able to get some more of their priorities acted on.

The Conservatives, of course, will continue to vote against anything and everything the Liberals propose, for no other reason than it was the Liberals who introduced the motion.

[–] Thedogdrinkscoffee@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 year ago

Spring 2028

[–] breakfastmtn@lemmy.ca 10 points 1 year ago

There are a bunch of ridings that are still too close to call. The advanced and special ballots remaining have skewed heavily toward the liberals. They still may end up with a majority.

[–] takeda@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago

My bad then.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] sik0fewl@lemmy.ca 6 points 1 year ago

They do not need a coalition to form a minority government. They didn't have one last time either.

[–] Kecessa@sh.itjust.works 15 points 1 year ago

We'll have to wait a few days for the official results as special votes haven't been counted yet, they might end up being able to form an alliance with the Greens if they reach 171 seats. Otherwise NDP will be their option.

[–] kingofras@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

We’re doing Dutton here on Saturday.

[–] Corngood@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 year ago

We'll be watching from Canada

[–] griff@lemmings.world 3 points 1 year ago

PP lost his seat, eh?

[–] selkiesidhe@lemm.ee 38 points 1 year ago (2 children)

If only all cons would lose their seats the world would be a better place...

[cries in Florida]

[–] RandomStickman@fedia.io 30 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Tangentially, his riding has like 91 candidates to protest against the first past the post system, which is pretty funny too

[–] SatansMaggotyCumFart@lemmy.world 16 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The ballot in the riding is over three feet long.

[–] maxsettings@lemmy.ca 8 points 1 year ago

The polling staff were teaching people how to properly fold it so it would fit in the ballot boxes. They also had a sample ballot hanging on the wall and reminded everyone it was in “alphabetical order with the party name under each candidate” lol.

[–] argh_another_username@lemmy.ca 16 points 1 year ago (2 children)

And the bastard is not even quitting. He said he’ll still be the PC’s leader.

[–] Jhex@lemmy.world 17 points 1 year ago (3 children)

he is a weasel.... he gave his speech early to be able to make false claims of stopping the NDP from forming coalition with the Liberals (which they did not) and that he would stay as leader which is extremely unlikely without a seat... specially about all the badgering of Carney for being an "unelected PM"...

PP, you are worse than unelected, the people you have worked for for the last 20 years do not want anything to do with you

[–] felsiq@lemmy.zip 6 points 1 year ago

specially about all the badgering of Carney for being an "unelected PM"...

I hope you’re right about this, but hypocrisy has never stopped conservatives before

[–] Poop@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 year ago

I was watching his speech live on CBC and the seat counts were on the bottom of the screen. I shit you not, maybe 10-30 seconds after he said this bit about denying the coalition, the seats flipped over so the coalition was possible. It went back quickly after and then back to coalition possible. I laughed very hard.

I can't find a video where the reported polls are included like on the live broadcast though. It makes me sad because it was priceless. I believe the seats were 164/165 Liberal and 7 NDP.

[–] HarkMahlberg@kbin.earth 16 points 1 year ago

God bless you Canada

[–] njm1314@lemmy.world 13 points 1 year ago

There is simply no way they keep them on as leader of the party. That would be suicide. His strategy failed utterly and completely. The Liberals we're extremely unpopular and he should have won in a landslide and yet he fumbled terribly down the stretch. It should have been an easy needle to thread. Hell Ford did it, the fact that this idiot didn't understand that is all the reason why they shouldn't keep him on.

[–] ipkpjersi@lemmy.ml 10 points 1 year ago

That was a seriously spectacular failure.

[–] Punchshark@lemmy.ca 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

CANADA SAID IT DOESNT NEED A SMALL ~pp~

[–] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 5 points 1 year ago

We don't want Trump's little PP, thank you.

[–] Atelopus-zeteki@fedia.io 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yay Canada! Y'all give me hope. Don't give up on US just yet.

[–] cattywampas@lemm.ee 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

This makes me think 2026 midterms could go very well.

[–] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 7 points 1 year ago (2 children)
[–] Zaktor@sopuli.xyz 3 points 1 year ago

They'll happen. They'll be voter suppressed, with federal interference and manufactured crises, and results from red states could possibly be entirely fabricated with little recourse. It's going to be touch and go even if anti-Trump sentiment is high.

[–] cattywampas@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago

They will, and I don't think that sentiment is very helpful.

[–] MyOpinion@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago

So much winning!

[–] Stamau123@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Hahaha, buh-bye