this post was submitted on 27 Apr 2025
183 points (99.5% liked)

Canada

9621 readers
934 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Related Communities


🍁 Meta


🗺️ Provinces / Territories


🏙️ Cities / Local Communities

Sorted alphabetically by city name.


🏒 SportsHockey

Football (NFL): incomplete

Football (CFL): incomplete

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer


💻 Schools / Universities

Sorted by province, then by total full-time enrolment.


💵 Finance, Shopping, Sales


🗣️ Politics


🍁 Social / Culture


Rules

  1. Keep the original title when submitting an article. You can put your own commentary in the body of the post or in the comment section.

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage: lemmy.ca


founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 

EDIT: If the elections.ca website is down for you, see here

Election Information

I recommend that you check the links yourself! I've copied some of the information below:

Ways to vote

See this page for full details.

Vote on election day (April 28)

Vote by mail

Special Ballots

Remember: Once you apply to vote by special ballot, you can't change your mind and vote at advance polls or on election day.

See this page for deadlines for when you can apply for one, and when they must receive it by. It also has information on what you must do differently when filling out this ballot: https://www.elections.ca/content2.aspx?section=vote&dir=spe&document=index&lang=e

If you are having any issues, reach out to your local Elections Canada office to know your options.

Data on your district:

Find your riding, your local Elections Canada office, and your candidates by using the search on the homepage: elections.ca

You can also use the detailed search at: elections.ca/scripts/vis/FindED

(page 7) 21 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 35 points 1 week ago (7 children)

Just in case anyone is using 338 for info:

  • the higher voter turnout so far indicates this type of model will be less accurate this election.
  • the riding numbers are from provincial polling, there is no per riding polling incorporated. With increased turnout, I expect these to be less accurate.
  • the model works by rating pollsters based on how well the predict past elections. That’s why increased turnout means things may swing from their forecast.

All that adds up to the potential for huge swings in votes, swings that can go either direction.

Things to watch for:

  • Gen Z men’s rightward swing. Expect high turnout from this group for the Conservatives. They consume a lot of right wing media and have been struggling with tough economic conditions, so will be motivated.
  • Boomer influence is waning — this is the first election they are not the largest demographic.
  • Gen X are actually wealthier than boomers and are the only demographic that en masse had better economic outlooks since COVID. I don’t know if they’re going to stay the coarse with LPC or vote CPC for the tax cuts, traditionally more income swings right, especially with how Pollievre wants to change housing taxes
  • Older women and Quebec are very anti-Pollievre, this might end up with a suppressed vote or a very strong vote LPC.
  • Rural areas I think will swing more conservative than ever, and this might be where the forecasts swing. E.g. rural Ontario may not be as safe as thought.

TLDR be prepared for surprises today.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] [email protected] 28 points 1 week ago

Just got this beautiful flyer hand delivered by the CPC to help me vote against the CPC:

[–] [email protected] 25 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Good information.

Given we live in a FPTP country, this is a worthwhile thing to consider as well: https://smartvoting.ca/ridings/federal-2025

You can look up your riding to see vote projections; you ultimately vote the system you have.

[–] [email protected] 34 points 1 week ago

No harm to you at all, but I'm avoiding that site completely and advising everyone I work with and care about to stick with one of the other poll prediction sites like 338 if they have to use anything (scroll down for tl;dr).

Originally called polarispolls, smartvoting is run out of Polaris Entertainment.

When the smartvoting site was launched during the last Ontario election and started showing up on facebook/twitter/lemmy/etc, they didn't include specific information about their (proprietary) methodology, but they've put together a pdf for the federal launch. If anyone cares to read it, it's here.

Polaris Entertainment is made up of 3 people, afaict, and they're all podcast influencers. The youtube link here is a joint podcast they did 5 months ago. In it, the guy who claims he made the smartvoting website suggests twice just in this one interview that the NDP should bow out federally. Pretty standard Hot Take these days so not particularly sus, except that it's coming from a guy who made a vote recommendation website.

The person running the site used the royal WE a tonne when smartvoting was just one person during the Ontario election, and he now claims to have a "bipartisan data board." The site also now has someone they're naming as a general manager of the site, and she's said the NDP is running a harassment campaign against them, which is affecting everyone's mental health. Now, the same guy who claims he made the site says the reason he won't name any of the people on his new board and won't share any of his data is because of the NDP.

tl;dr: At best, smartvoting is a do-gooder project by someone trying to save us all from ourselves. With project 2025 rushing down the pipe and the mass media influence of the rightwing, I totally get it. People with fab intentions don't always come up smelling like roses, and I never require Purity from my left allies. But at worst, smartvoting could be another disinfo campaign, claiming to be anti-conservative, openly interfering with our elections to amplify the appearance of division between Canadians on the left, when we're already pretty cool with strategic voting and have been doing it when necessary for decades.

[disclaimer: this is the second comment I've left about being suspicious of this site since I made my lemmy account.]

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

There's also 338Canada's per-riding projection. There's the one by Eric Grenier too (CBC Poll Tracker).

One should check more than one to ensure there's no funny business going on.

[–] [email protected] 20 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

Did someone take down 338canada.com or did we crash it?

E: Nope, it's an attack. Apparently the French version works.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

It's been down for me on and off since yesterday

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 0 points 6 days ago (1 children)

I do not know that you should call it an attack, I am sure their servers are not used to the turn out and therefore the people just learning about the elections.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 week ago

It's working for me.

[–] [email protected] 19 points 1 week ago (1 children)

If you don't know who to vote for, I recommend using vote compass to see how closely you align to the parties.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 week ago (6 children)

I'm usually disappointed by the vote compass. Lately it has been putting me between the Liberals and Cons because I am ambivalent about social issues and left leaning on economic issues. If you think it is non of the government's business which race/gender you are, that is putting you on the right these days.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I’m usually disappointed by the vote compass. Lately it has been putting me between the Liberals and Cons because I am ambivalent about social issues and left leaning on economic issues. If you think it is non of the government’s business which race/gender you are, that is putting you on the right these days.

They've introduced a feature at the end where you can choose to weight your answers, so the social issues you don't really care about can be weighted 0 and get a more accurate result.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 week ago

I got the same result for the same reason.

I think the parties not releasing their platform until so late makes it incorrect.

It’s a good idea, but not good this election.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 week ago

There's a "weight your results" button that let's you indicate how much you care about each question.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 17 points 1 week ago

Bringing your voter information card with a driver's license or any other Canadian Gov't issued card with photo, name and address is like having a FastPass for voting.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 week ago

When my special ballot hadn't shown up the local election office said that there is still a process to vote in person, you have to sign a statement saying you have not voted yet. It showed up the next day but according to them there is a process but they don't mention it unless it's really needed. It was last Thursday so I was a bit worried I wouldn't be able to vote at all.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

Here's the two main poll aggregator's per-riding projections for all of those considering voting strategically:

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 week ago (2 children)

And, if you truly don't know for who to vote: cancel your vote. Go and check every single boxes of your ballot!

There's no reason why you shouldn't go and vote, even if you want to vote for no one!

[–] [email protected] 24 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Everyone I've known who has done has always been an incredibly low information voter. It isn't that hard to make a choice. Expecting to have a federal party that matches 100 percent of your beliefs is not realistic and presenting it as an option is just used to suppress votes.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›