this post was submitted on 24 Apr 2025
786 points (99.4% liked)

News

36354 readers
2719 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works 317 points 10 months ago (4 children)

What alarmed Nicholas Reppucci, head of the Charlottesville Office of the Public Defender, is that the enforcers called in to detain the two men in the city Tuesday morning were wearing plain clothes and did not display badges or arrest warrants.

Sounds an awful lot like kidnapping. So then the question becomes: why didn’t the court officers or local police arrest the so-called “ICE agents”? Up to and including firing on the assailants, if necessary? Because if you don’t show your badge, and you can’t back it up, you are not who you say you are. And that becomes broad-ass daylight kidnapping. And the actual uniformed officers did nothing (I know why they did nothing - the call is coming from inside the house).

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 85 points 10 months ago (2 children)

Because the people who work at the court were likely complicit.

Of course they wouldn't tell the Public Defender, but that doesn't mean that he bailiff or whatever, wasn't in on it.

Sounds like a courthouse that is absolutely corrupt of the constitution and should be all held to treason. The U.S. brought back the firing squad, and the president preaches for no trials. If anyone knows me I love this country. That said, I'm fairly sure this country says we are required to shoot the judge by firing squad without a trial? Or maybe they havent been clear. Is it just racism based slaughter, or slaughter all around they support?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Fredselfish@lemmy.world 55 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Well maybe we can use this and go get Lugi. Just claim to be ICE and maybe the courts let us get him, thinking we going deport him to El Salvador.

[–] gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works 34 points 10 months ago

Hey, if it’s stupid but it works, it’s not that stupid.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Nougat@fedia.io 189 points 10 months ago (4 children)

Let’s assume for a moment that the abducters here were federal agents.

How long before people get the bright idea that they can pull a stunt like this without being federal agents? Has that already happened?

[–] Natanael@infosec.pub 97 points 10 months ago (1 children)
[–] Nougat@fedia.io 47 points 10 months ago (1 children)

I suppose the scenario I was really thinking of is one where someone is literally abducted by adults, and not just fucking idiot kids playing fuck around.

Which has happened in the article posted here, we're just taking them on their word that they're actually federal agents.

[–] monotremata@lemmy.ca 34 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Yeah, this was the part that really got me:

“Show us a warrant,” the video shows one of the two women demanding as they attempt to get between the detainers and the detainee.

“Do not touch me or impede me in my lawful duties,” the man in the pink shirt responds. “We are officers from Homeland Security.”

That's a real bully-logic move right there. How are we supposed to know that these are your lawful duties if you're refusing to show us your warrant or even your badge? Like, if she had blocked them at this point and the issue were brought to court (and yes, it's ironic that this is happening in a court), then I can't imagine a jury saying "well yeah, you can't prevent a guy from abducting someone just because he won't give you any indication other than a pinky swear that he has the legal authority to do it." But, of course, the obvious implication in the moment was that since he was from the "abduct people in an unmarked van with unlimited authority" branch of the government, this wasn't going to a jury trial, and she was either getting out of the way or she was going in the van too.

I dunno, man. It's scary.

[–] Zorsith@lemmy.blahaj.zone 20 points 10 months ago (2 children)

So what I'm gathering here, is if you can get some friends together, you can get yourself out of court in a pinch.

This is not behavior they want to encourage long term

[–] OutlierBlue@lemmy.ca 21 points 10 months ago (2 children)

Trump isn't thinking in the long term. He's usually not even thinking in the short term.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] AcidicBasicGlitch@lemm.ee 71 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Pretty sure some people showed up at San Francisco City Hall claiming to be with DOGE and demanding they be given access to personal files.

The staff refused and when they finally called the police the men claiming to be with DOGE fled the scene.

It was just some insane MAGA duds pretending to be with DOGE.

Especially with ICE going into schools and other previous safe zones now, think about how easy it would be for people to take advantage of these situations.

If a person is already willing to kidnap someone, do you really think they wouldn't easily be willing to disguise their own identity, command authority and prey on people's fears of retaliation for not complying?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] lowleekun@ani.social 178 points 10 months ago (2 children)

Maybe shoot kidnappers? Amazing how often your guns are used to kill school children and how rarely to fight injustice.

[–] Buelldozer@lemmy.today 57 points 10 months ago (7 children)

Maybe shoot kidnappers?

Normal people cannot legally carry firearms into a Court House.

[–] lowleekun@ani.social 35 points 10 months ago (9 children)

Is there no law enforcements with weapons in your courts? And also what about the kidnappers on the streets? Have any gotten shot so far?

Iknow people simply do not want to risk their life and thats fair but i wonder about the use scenario for all these weapons you guys own and i do not understand why besides having a fetish for weapons.

[–] pivot_root@lemmy.world 20 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Is there no law enforcements with weapons in your courts?

American cops don't protect American people. First and foremost, they protect their own. Beyond that, they protect the establishment that gives them their authority.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Beldarofremulak@discuss.online 18 points 10 months ago (1 children)

I like to shoot far off cans, bottles, and targets out in the country. I've never shot an animal (that I know of) or a person (pretty confident about that one) and if there was some rabble-rousing going on and I was for some reason armed and loaded I don't have the mental capacity nor the confidence to decide who lives and dies. Just because I own guns doesn't mean I'm your defender. You should go buy a gun and become the justice decider you describe. Become the change you want to see.

What is happening is abhorrent. Morons with guns aren't the answer.

load more comments (1 replies)

The Venn diagram of gun fetishists and the people still cheering for Trump is nearly a circle.

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
[–] Chochacho@lemmy.frozeninferno.xyz 36 points 10 months ago (5 children)

A comment almost exactly like this got me permabanned from reddit. It's like they're telling us who's side they're on.

[–] Sturgist@lemmy.ca 17 points 10 months ago (2 children)

I mean.... they've been pretty clear about it for several years now?

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] henfredemars@infosec.pub 119 points 10 months ago (4 children)

Wow you really can’t tell the difference between officials and gangs of criminals these days.

[–] dan1101@lemm.ee 59 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Indeed, kidnapping is one of the things that drug cartels are known for. Now we have people claiming to be federal officers doing kidnapping? There needs to be a LOT of pushback over this, it's crazy and ridiculous.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Maeve@kbin.earth 35 points 10 months ago

By design. It reminds me of another article posted on Lemmy recently, that "tough on crime" jurisdictions are making it less safe to live in those jurisdictions.

“Is it worth the trouble to go to court?” Reppucci asked. “I think it’s going to make it much harder, inherently harder, and more likely that people will disregard lawfully issued subpoenas, both by the prosecution and by defense attorneys and by civil attorneys and, even perhaps, dare we say, in divorce cases or custody case hearings that people are going to evaluate whether or not it makes sense to follow lawful state orders.”

[–] Nougat@fedia.io 19 points 10 months ago

They're the same picture.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] barneypiccolo@lemm.ee 78 points 10 months ago (43 children)

What alarmed Nicholas Reppucci, head of the Charlottesville Office of the Public Defender, is that the enforcers called in to detain the two men in the city Tuesday morning were wearing plain clothes and did not display badges or arrest warrants.

Presumably, the courthouse is filled with cops and others with arrest authority, so why did they allow two men in plainclothes without badges or warrants leave with two people?

If the DOGE pirates had been gunned down in the first lobby the invaded, it would have ended there, or at least gone down a different path.

We should not be normalizing this behavior, and setting precedents. Without a badge, you will not be listened to, and you will leave the building immediately. Without a warrant, you will not be putting your hands on any person. If you attempt to bypass either requirement, you will be arrested. And if you attempt to do enforce your demands by force, you will be shot.

[–] flicker@lemmy.dbzer0.com 36 points 10 months ago

On the plus side, if anybody reading this ever has reason to think that they might need to go into a police station and remove someone being held there, apparently if you and a friend or two look sufficiently the part, you can just walk in, in plainclothes, and claim to be Homeland Security, and just... take a dude and leave.

load more comments (42 replies)
[–] BenLeMan@lemmy.world 63 points 10 months ago (7 children)

Whatever happened to the Fourth Amendment? If they're not even bothering to uphold the Constitution in a courthouse you guys are well and truly fucked.

[–] NauticalNoodle@lemmy.ml 21 points 10 months ago

I’m pretty sure Homeland Security was created with the sole intent of subverting the constitution from it's inception.

[–] Stern@lemmy.world 16 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

https://www.aclu.org/documents/constitution-100-mile-border-zone

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Border_search_exception

The magical 100 mile "Nah constitution don't really work here" zone that also, crazily enough, includes 2/3 of the population.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] boughtmysoul@lemmy.world 55 points 10 months ago (2 children)

Is this exactly the kind of stuff 2A was supposed to have solved? What were the half a billion guns for?

[–] boolean_sledgehammer@lemmy.world 61 points 10 months ago (2 children)

A good portion of the 2A fetishists in this country love jackbooted authoritarianism as long as it's aimed at the correct demographic.

They love the fantasy of being a plucky revolutionary, but in reality they are the ones helping the boot come down.

[–] Guns0rWeD13@lemmy.world 21 points 10 months ago (1 children)

but we can change that any time. change the demographic by arming yourself and not being one of those people.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Stamau123@lemmy.world 30 points 10 months ago (2 children)

Guns are for the tyranny of green energy and gay marriage. This is what they voted for.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Cocodapuf@lemmy.world 41 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (5 children)

It's horrifying to see so many incidents of kidnapping in courtrooms. I can't imagine a more blatant and clear example of subversion of the legal judicial process.

There would be no reason to remove them from a courtroom if you believed the court would come to the same conclusions they have. So the logical explanation is that they know that what they're doing is illegal and that these people they're snatching haven't actually done anything wrong. It's shameful that we've allowed this to happen in our country and frankly, it's embarrassing that this is what the once great USA has stooped to.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] bunsley@lemmy.ml 33 points 10 months ago (2 children)

The knock-on effect of this now would discourage undocumented migrants even just trying to engage with the legal system, being a witness or even reporting on crimes. For people on the fringes of a society it could lead to even worse exploitation and marginalization

[–] bitjunkie@lemmy.world 17 points 10 months ago

Working as intended

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] iamnotme@feddit.uk 27 points 10 months ago (2 children)

Definitely not the sort of thing a fascist would do. Lefty liberals are Larping

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Jumpingspiderman@lemmy.world 27 points 10 months ago (1 children)

First, this is straight up Nazi secret police stuff. Second how did the court know these guys weren't confederates of the folks in court intending a jail break. Where the FUCK were the bailiffs in this unlawful seizure?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Kalysta@lemm.ee 27 points 10 months ago (3 children)

So three men just kidnapped a dude.

They need to be banned from doing this in plain clothes. At minumim. At best ICE needs to be abolished.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca 22 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Questioning the security of the courthouse if you can just do that

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Realitaetsverlust@lemmy.zip 15 points 10 months ago

Babe wake up, new gender just dropped

load more comments
view more: next ›