this post was submitted on 19 Apr 2025
327 points (98.5% liked)

News

36000 readers
3004 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

IF DONALD TRUMP’S sweeping global tariffs send household good prices soaring and drive the economy into recession, at least one industry could profit.

The Trump administration is considering using tariff revenues to buy Bitcoin for a “Strategic Bitcoin Reserve,” a top administration crypto official said in an interview last week.

The White House’s proposal is driving interest from crypto industry figures who have made building the reserve one of their top priorities.

It is uniting critics on the right and left, however, who have cast the reserve as a pointless industry giveaway that will come at the expense of ordinary taxpayers. Using tariff money would add insult to injury, they say.

all 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] betterdeadthanreddit@lemmy.world 51 points 10 months ago (4 children)

Why do we let the dumbest motherfuckers decide anything, ever?

[–] My_IFAKs___gone@lemmy.world 23 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Because they're the popular kids!

And they're rich.

I'm not saying these are good reasons, just that they're reasons.

[–] match@pawb.social 5 points 10 months ago

more like they have the cops in their pocket

[–] whodrankarnoldpalmer@startrek.website 5 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Because your “opposition” politicians and voters are cowardly as hell?

[–] raltoid@lemmy.world 27 points 10 months ago (1 children)

That's one way to take make money...

  1. Buy a bunch of personal bitcoin

  2. Announce that the government is buying a ton of bitcoin

  3. Wait for the value to surge

  4. Sell your bitcoin at the new inflated value

[–] Cocodapuf@lemmy.world 19 points 10 months ago (2 children)

You forgot the part where they take all the government purchased Bitcoin and cash that out to personal accounts.

They could literally steal billions of dollars this way... It's terrifying.

[–] Dragonstaff@leminal.space 3 points 10 months ago (1 children)

There is no point to taking the extra strep of buying Bitcoin when they steal government funds to personal accounts.

[–] Cocodapuf@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago

If they're already doing that, sure. Though that is harder to cover the tracks of.

[–] Dogiedog64@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Whoa whoa whoa whoa whoa... "COULD"???? We both know that they WILL do that, given the chance. The Fash Trash are opportunistic parasites, after all.

[–] Clinicallydepressedpoochie@lemmy.world 3 points 10 months ago (1 children)

They already freed up a bunch of seized bitcoin and called it a "reserve." Wtf is government suppose to do with bitcoin? Buy mercenaries on the deep web?

[–] Cocodapuf@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

I mean, Bitcoin is an appropriate currency to use as a reserve, that's not misguided. The problem is that they can't be trusted with access to the funds.

With bitcoin basically a stand in for the dollar these days, what would the purpose of that be?

[–] SendMePhotos@lemmy.world 21 points 10 months ago (6 children)

Right... So what happens is you dump money into it, the government then dumps money into it, you cash out, then the government is out money and you grain money... Assuming you have capital to fuck around with prior.

[–] catloaf@lemm.ee 17 points 10 months ago

Not quite. They'll pull the rug before you get to cash out.

[–] Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world 13 points 10 months ago (1 children)

you grain money

Is that why the kids have been calling money "bread"?

[–] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 7 points 10 months ago

Oh look, another buy-the-dipshit

[–] somethingsnappy@lemmy.world 3 points 10 months ago

GME ahead of the game somehow. Would be nice if we could benefit from the pump/dump.

[–] gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works 3 points 10 months ago (1 children)

…except the thing you cashed out into is undergoing rampant inflation.

[–] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago

All the people panic-selling their investments are just reinvesting in USD

[–] Cocodapuf@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago

I'm not sure that's sound investing advice...

[–] vegeta@lemmy.world 18 points 10 months ago (2 children)

Would'nt dogecoin be more efficient?

/s

[–] Cocodapuf@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Hah. Yeah, put your money where your mouth is! I fucking dare you!

Put all your money into that worthless joke!

[–] crusa187@lemmy.ml 2 points 10 months ago

It’s gonna be $DOGE.

[–] AngrySquirrel@lemm.ee 15 points 10 months ago

If this regime has the government buy crypto; the government will lose access to it. These people will either "lose the encryption codes", actually loose the encryption codes, steel it, let it be stolen, ect..

[–] collapse_already@lemmy.ml 14 points 10 months ago

If they're leaking this now, they have already purchased their personal "investments" to dump in exchange for tax (tariff) dollars.

[–] HubertManne@piefed.social 13 points 10 months ago

Shouldn't they be paying down that debt they are increasing. Esepcially since they are driving foreign companies to not buy it.

[–] Etterra@discuss.online 8 points 10 months ago

I'm sure there's no way this could backfire.

Oh and you know it's really all Elon's idea.

[–] Clinicallydepressedpoochie@lemmy.world 8 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Wasn't bit coin suppose to be decentralized currency? Wtf is it even, now?

[–] muusemuuse@lemm.ee 4 points 10 months ago
[–] wirebeads@lemmy.ca 7 points 10 months ago

Everything Trump touches turns to shit. Just ask how his casinos, steaks, planes, hotels, university, and rape victims are doing.

[–] Zachariah@lemmy.world 7 points 10 months ago (1 children)

seems like a great way to siphon off the cash

[–] Cocodapuf@lemmy.world 3 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Yeah, we can't let them do this... Bitcoin is electric cash, once they have public funds in Bitcoin, they have turned it into private funds, they've already pocketed it. We can't let them steal from the country like that...

[–] Zachariah@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

I’m assuming the plan is to buy bitcoin from themselves and their friends with taxpayer cash. They don’t care about the bitcoin after that. They’ll have the cash.

[–] Cocodapuf@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

That's not a great assumption. He doesn't need to take the margins on an increased value of Bitcoin, maybe making 20% on a quick investment... he could take the Bitcoin itself! Instead of making 20% on the money that he and his cronies put in, he could make 100% on the money the NATION puts in... It's the difference between millions and many billions!

This is a much bigger deal than a pump and dump scam! Bitcoin is cash, he could convert it into any currency in the world whenever he wants. It's instant money laundering.

[–] hakase@lemm.ee 6 points 10 months ago (2 children)

Honestly, using the country's surplus to fund a sovereign wealth fund like Norway instead of throwing it into the black hole of the military industrial complex seems like it would be a pretty good idea.

Too bad they're stealing taxpayer dollars through tariffs to throw into the additional black hole of crypto market manipulation instead.

[–] caffinatedone@lemmy.world 3 points 10 months ago (1 children)

There’s no surplus, even with the extreme tariffs that trump is pushing. Given the economic destruction that they’re likely to cause, they’re probably a net loss for the treasury (and certainly are if one considers the damage that they’re doing to the IRS).

The reasons that the ‘sovereign wealth fund’ idea keeps coming up are:

  1. All of the cool authoritarians have one
  2. trump really, really, wants a slush fund to grift off of

That’s it.

[–] hakase@lemm.ee 0 points 10 months ago (1 children)

The country absolutely has an enormous surplus, it's just that we waste it all on military contracts with little to no return.

[–] caffinatedone@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago

Nope.

If we cut the military budget to zero, we’d still have a trillion dollar deficit.

CBO Budget Infographic

[–] MojoMcJojo@lemmy.world 5 points 10 months ago

To the moon! 🚀 🌙 👊 🇺🇲 🔥