this post was submitted on 16 Apr 2025
195 points (98.0% liked)

Global News

3778 readers
458 users here now

What is global news?

Something that happened or was uncovered recently anywhere in the world. It doesn't have to have global implications. Just has to be informative in some way.


Post guidelines

Title formatPost title should mirror the news source title.
URL formatPost URL should be the original link to the article (even if paywalled) and archived copies left in the body. It allows avoiding duplicate posts when cross-posting.
[Opinion] prefixOpinion (op-ed) articles must use [Opinion] prefix before the title.
Country prefixCountry prefix can be added tothe title with a separator (|, :, etc.) where title is not clear enough from which country the news is coming from.


Rules

1. English onlyTitle and associated content has to be in English.
2. No social media postsAvoid all social media posts. Try searching for a source that has a written article or transcription on the subject.
3. Respectful communicationAll communication has to be respectful of differing opinions, viewpoints, and experiences.
4. InclusivityEveryone is welcome here regardless of age, body size, visible or invisible disability, ethnicity, sex characteristics, gender identity and expression, education, socio-economic status, nationality, personal appearance, race, caste, color, religion, or sexual identity and orientation.
5. Ad hominem attacksAny kind of personal attacks are expressly forbidden. If you can't argue your position without attacking a person's character, you already lost the argument.
6. Off-topic tangentsStay on topic. Keep it relevant.
7. Instance rules may applyIf something is not covered by community rules, but are against lemmy.zip instance rules, they will be enforced.


Companion communities

Icon generated via LLM model | Banner attribution


If someone is interested in moderating this community, message @[email protected].

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The White House said the higher tariff is as a result of Chinese retaliation.

Archived version: https://archive.is/20250416092702/https://www.newsweek.com/china-245-trump-tariff-2060295


Disclaimer: The article linked is from a single source with a single perspective. Make sure to cross-check information against multiple sources to get a comprehensive view on the situation.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 94 points 4 days ago (5 children)

A million bajillion percent.

[–] [email protected] 53 points 4 days ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 18 points 4 days ago

Muwahahaha!!

[–] [email protected] 25 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

Indeed. It's at the point the exact number is irrelevant.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Infinity percent No backsies runs away

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 days ago

Me first! Smoke bomb!

[–] [email protected] 4 points 4 days ago

You beat me to it by a mile.

[–] [email protected] 68 points 4 days ago (3 children)

It’s fun to watch just how incredibly fucked America is becoming on the global scale.

It’s being led down a path of isolation by a Nazi syphilis infected rapist who acts like a toddler at nap time throwing a temper tantrum because he wasn’t able to get the juice box he wanted.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 4 days ago

"fun" like the pejorative "fun", right?

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 days ago

It's just such an asinine way to go down.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 4 days ago (1 children)

It fucks lots of people around the globe. I don’t see any fun this.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 48 points 4 days ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 24 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Only for goods that the US almost exclusively sourcing from China. So quite a lot of them.

While things like textiles and simple plastics could probably be on-shored to the US in relatively short time, many more advanced products will cost a lot more.

But the tariffs seem much smaller than China deciding to stop selling refined rare earths and products from them to the US and US allies such as the EU. That is going to make the US bleed big time.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Yeah, what's with the EU getting hit with stray bullets? They are not imposing crazy tariffs on Chinese goods, apart from EV cars which are heavily subsidized by the Chinese government

[–] [email protected] 11 points 4 days ago

I'm Dutch. If China would keep on selling this stuff to us, I guarantee you someone from my country will find a way to sell it to the US. Something called "Dutch east India Company mentality".

[–] [email protected] 28 points 4 days ago

Title should be "Americans face 245% Trump tariff on China"

[–] [email protected] 30 points 4 days ago (8 children)

The US is only 4% of the world's population. We may have more US dollars than anywhere else, but 96% of the world is still a sizable potential market.

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] [email protected] 20 points 4 days ago
[–] [email protected] 23 points 4 days ago

Will probably see further movements from the PRC to sell off US treasury bonds and shifting more away from the dollar in general, along with tighter export restrictions on rare Earth. China already said they won't keep increasing tariffs, but they seem dedicated to not backing down, and they have the Material means to actually resist US trade aggression.

What would be incredibly based is if the PRC starts paying off loans in Africa with its dollars, decoupling the Global South from the US even further. Gets rid of dollars and debt in the Global South, potentially freeing up new customers for goods produced in China and strengthening ties.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 4 days ago

This headline is bullshit. The correct headline would be "Americans now face 245% Trump tariff on Chinese goods". No need to spread misinformation about how tariffs work.

[–] [email protected] 20 points 4 days ago (1 children)

This is so far beyond stupid that it's wrapped around, overshot smart, and plunged into stupid again.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 4 days ago

Gonna need more than eight bits soon.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 days ago

All of those numbers mean absolutely nothing. As soon as the price is higher than shipping it through Singapore it's useless.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Welp when the debt defaults and everyone stops using American dollars or hold their gold here, then better hope we don’t all become forced to use crypto like El Salvador (which is probably the blueprint plan).

[–] [email protected] 12 points 4 days ago (2 children)

Doesn't matter whether it's a 80% (or whatever it was, basically changes on a whim) or 245%. There is no difference.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (1 children)

It does make a difference. Let's say a thing you need about once a month to run your business was 10 dollars from China. You can get a similar product in the US, but it's 30 dollars. At 80%, it's still cheaper to get from China, 18 bucks. At 245%, it's now 24.50 to buy from China. Still cheaper than buying from the US, but now way more expensive.

I know these are made up numbers, but it isn't that unusual for US made items to be 3-10x the price of making it in 'cheap labor' countries. Also, this assumes there is a comparative replacement made in the US. But many machine parts have no analog or are proprietary, you must buy it from China or end that part of your business.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Your point is fairly good but you need to recheck your math. At 145% a $10 product will be $24.50. At 245% it's gonna be $34.50. And that doesn't even take into account additional federal, state, and local taxes.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 8 points 4 days ago (1 children)

It was 145% last, before the current rate, for those curious. It only further cements your point, it no longer has real impact, importing from China is just as dead.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 4 days ago (1 children)

These numbers are absolutely wild. Has anyone made a site for tracking this madness?

[–] [email protected] 7 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Many, it's all over the news. It seemingly changes based on emotion though, we thought it was 125% but it was really 145%.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 days ago (1 children)

I’ve seen a bunch of articles, each with just the latest number and a date. In order to make a nice graph out of all of them, I would need to set up some sort of webscraping project to pool the numbers together. I’ve also seen a bunch of articles that have other types of graphs and tables that don’t really answer my question. The data is out there, but it’s scattered all over the place.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 days ago

Don't know of any, sorry!

[–] [email protected] 8 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

A post 6 hours old. I give a 50% chance, that the number is outdated.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 4 days ago (1 children)

You think they laugh at him? They probably laugh at him

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 6 points 4 days ago (1 children)

wtf they beat the Turkish car tariffs

[–] [email protected] 4 points 4 days ago

it was the highest in the world, used to be, before trump

[–] [email protected] 7 points 4 days ago

I shouldn't be laughing but...

[–] [email protected] 5 points 4 days ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 3 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Nah, its not over 9000 yet.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 3 points 4 days ago

hahaha line go brrrrrrr

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 days ago (3 children)

Yeah because they excempted the main imports so now they can jack it up to whatever to look tough even though they already conceded.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›