this post was submitted on 11 Apr 2025
71 points (96.1% liked)

News

28578 readers
3413 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 6 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 25 points 1 day ago

I wonder if they're going to start hitting states that have legalized cannabis.

Good job to the users who voted for Trump because he lied about supporting cannabis reform on the campaign trail, I guess.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 day ago

I’d like to once again congratulate drugs for winning the war on drugs

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

The war of drugs, and most other similar initiatives, mainly exist as tools for "law enforcement". In reality , "law enforcement" is primarily aimed at the lower classes when they step out of line.

It's extremely important to recognize that "laws" are enforced selectively. Those with power, money, and influence rarely suffer anything more than performative punishment, and only when not doing so might cause a substantial public backlash.

At the start of the war on drugs with Nixon, it was recognized (openly in conversations made public thanks to Watergate) as an extremely convenient way for cops to target and control blacks and anti-war protesters.

This continues today. Cop pulls you over and gets suspicious because you aren't white... "Is that marijuana I smell? I'm going to have to search your vehicle to find or, maybe even plant, something I can use to charge you with a crime." ... "You don't consent? That's sounds really suspicious. What are you hiding? Nothing? Well then it'd be easier if you just consent. It's really in your best interest." ... "Still no? Well, I hope you don't have somewhere to be, I'm going to have to call a K-9 in while I take 30 minutes to write up your ticket..."

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

This is why I support bodycams.

Protects civilians and good cops. Exposes bad ones. Willfully shutting off your bodycam during an incident should be a 3 strikes rule. Mistake? Warning. Two times? Suspended without pay. Three times? Fired.

Also BANNED FROM BEING HIRED ELSEWHERE.

Too many fucking times a corrupt/awful cop just goes to another branch to keep working. Should be stricter than the military. Dishonorable discharged.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 15 hours ago

While I'm not against body cams, I feel like they address issues so niche and so far removed from the core problems that they only really provide a false sense of a solution.

The problem is that a cop's purpose in our capitalist system is not to protect and serve the general population. It's not to universally enforce laws that improve society for the good of everyone. The system they exist in is corrupted to its core by capitalism. Most of the law itself doesn't exist for everyone's benefit - it exists to serve existing power structures.

Sure, cops will give legitimate tickets to people breaking traffic laws, and sometimes the powerful can't just pay for a good lawyer and have to face... a fine. Of course, a fine is just the cost of doing business if you have money. Also, note that the only portion of my example that was actually illegal for a cop was planting evidence, which cops have already learned to bypass by shifting their torso to distract from or obscure the action. Sure, they sometimes get caught if the victim has the resources for a good lawyer... and the cops misjudge how well they obscured the action... but the cop doesn't usually target people with those kinds of resources. Things like traffic fines exist to harvest money from the population to fund the department and serve well as an excuse to pull someone over and escalate the situation if needed.

Cops exist to selectively enforce laws mostly designed or corrupted to be selectively enforced. Sometimes the masses will get a decent law passed or a cop will try to do the right thing but the rest of the system has been corrupted enough that those with power rarely face consequences.

These laws and "enforcers" exist to teach the masses that they need to behave and keep their filthy, unworthy hands off of whatever the powerful don't think they deserve. The culture is that of the thin blue line, which serves to isolate them and otherize "civilians". The culture is that of noble warriors fighting for their lives and ready to defend themselves from a barbaric, uncivilized world... like brown kids and distressed minorities. They think that they "protect and serve". They put a lot of lipstick on that pig when you look at the big picture they only protect and serve those with power... and sometimes themselves.

When shit gets real and the masses protest, cops will be there to find (or infiltrate and create) a reason to escalate, arrest people, and disperse the protest. They'll enforce curfews to "keep the peace". They'll absolutely protect businesses. Sometimes they'll even break up strikes or attempts to organize.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 day ago

Yeah ... the DEA will be useful and needs expansion for the coming suppression of unwanted drugs:

  • The world devastating fentanyl crisis
  • The poisonous measles, covid, shingles vaccines distributed amongst naive americans.
  • The demonic influence of cannabis.
  • Abortion medication distributed to pregnant women in abortion clinics.

It'll probably save Medicare a few dollars as well so all is good in maga's world.