this post was submitted on 10 Apr 2025
449 points (96.9% liked)

memes

14140 readers
3257 users here now

Community rules

1. Be civilNo trolling, bigotry or other insulting / annoying behaviour

2. No politicsThis is non-politics community. For political memes please go to [email protected]

3. No recent repostsCheck for reposts when posting a meme, you can only repost after 1 month

4. No botsNo bots without the express approval of the mods or the admins

5. No Spam/AdsNo advertisements or spam. This is an instance rule and the only way to live.

A collection of some classic Lemmy memes for your enjoyment

Sister communities

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

by Centurii-chan

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 hours ago

Realcivilengineer is that you?

[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

The bottom one looks scary as fuck. I don't want to be in or around that thing if it was real.

[–] [email protected] 79 points 2 days ago (3 children)

both of these were designed by architects. neither reflects the twin simplicity and laziness that engineering embodies.

[–] [email protected] 85 points 2 days ago (13 children)

If engineers had our way all buildings would look like this

This is the ideal building. You may not like it but this is what peak performance looks like 😆

[–] [email protected] 3 points 12 hours ago

This is what's known in the Midwest as "tornado bait"

[–] [email protected] 2 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

My neighbour shop looks exactly like that. It went bankrupt cuz it's ugly as fuck

[–] [email protected] 5 points 11 hours ago

"Shop"? Depending on the type - and I don't want to jump to conclusions - I doubt it being ugly was a major part of its bankruptcy.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago

...i prefer corrugated arch structures, but rigid frames are popular for good reason...

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 day ago

Dogshit R-factor, poor impact resistance, I mean that's the obvious stuff lol

Peak performance is highly dependent on who's defining it 😝

[–] [email protected] 8 points 2 days ago

Brick? Pfft. Concrete elements all the way. There's no equal.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Why not continue the brick shell at least to eye level? Why does it stop at waist level?

[–] [email protected] 34 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Brick expensive :(

panel cheap :)

[–] [email protected] 9 points 2 days ago (2 children)

The real question is, why is there any brick at all?

(The answer is almost certainly that somebody other than the engineer imposed the requirement.)

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

...masonry wainscots look tacky-as-heck but they provide impact and moisture resistance where it's needed most...

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Is masonry really cheaper than using a slightly thicker gauge of steel and a decent epoxy paint for the bottom few feet?

[–] [email protected] 4 points 21 hours ago

...it's far more durable, mostly...

[–] [email protected] 23 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Brick waterproof.

Brick termite-proof.

Brick fireproof.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Panel same (probably, depending what kind of panel).

[–] [email protected] 2 points 14 hours ago

No, panel only as waterproof as the coating protecting it. Brick is rock, takes centuries to wear out.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] [email protected] 18 points 2 days ago (2 children)

As an engineer, I prefer to call it minmalism.

Quick edit: I saw the typo, but it is also an example of what the sentence is supposed to convey.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Look. i's ain't cheap, and half the readers won't even use it.

Leave it out, we'll claim it was a mistake, and if anyone really complains we can add it back later.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Are you kidding. Just slap an extra 20% of the is you think you used on the end in case.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 days ago

That's positvely genus!ii

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 days ago

I go with "efficiency"

[–] [email protected] 12 points 2 days ago

hey! I resemble those remarks!

[–] [email protected] 37 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Surely that second building is AI generated or something right? Surely physics would not allow such a monstrosity, nor would any city approve it... right?

[–] [email protected] 26 points 1 day ago (2 children)
[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 day ago

yo his work is sick

[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Yeah I didn't think there was any way. Even with like a steel frame and everything else made of Styrofoam and paper mache, I'm pretty sure that thing would still snap off under its own weight.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

It’s totally doable with the right structure and balancing. Have you seen the bases of skyscrapers like 150 North Riverside in Chicago or the Rainier Tower in Seattle? Or the One Za'abeel in Dubai, which has a 65 meter overhang in an 90 degree angle.

150 North Riverside

One Za’abeel

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

I don't know what the first building has to do with the original image. But the one in Dubai is much more conparable. But they are not the same. The Dubai building certainly needs strong framing to keep that overhand from falling. But it is also held at one end and the middle giving it strength and stability. And the forces at the attachment points are both vertical (upward or downward at the end depending on weight distribution on the lever and downward in the middle). That makes a huge difference as they don't have to work against lateral forces. The middle attachment holds all the weight and the end attachment counters all of the torque on the lever. The center of mass is also within the footprint of the building(s) bases

The actual length of the overhang for the real building, while impressive, does not compare to the length in the original image. It does not have anything holding the weight in the middle of the lever, meaning that the end attachment has to hold the weight up alone, AND counter the torque. Furthermore, the point at which the hang in the altered image is attached to the main trunk is also at wide angle meaning it will put a lot of lateral forces on the trunk that are not counter balances by the opposite branch which is shorter and less angled. The center of mass of the hanging branch would be well outside the base of the building and so it would want to rotate at the connection point and pull away from the joint. That's if the steel frame itself doesn't just bend under its own weight putting torque on the lever.

I really don't think that there are any materials under Earth gravity capable of creating a rigid structure with this design at this scale. The forces would be tremendous on a single junction point and along the length of the frame of the hanging arm. Something would give.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I'm not sure it exists. I spent three whole minutes on Google and can't find it. I'd expect it to be fairly famous if real.

I'm not sure Y anyone would build it, but I do think we could figure a way to build it safely if someone wanted to throw enough money at it.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 day ago

Its fictional, I found an article

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 day ago

For a drainage engineer, he's shockingly bad with sluices in Timberborn, lol.

[–] [email protected] 21 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

What buildings are these?

Can't believe no-one asked yet

[–] [email protected] 22 points 2 days ago (1 children)

The first building looks like it's a female connector for a high throughput cable of some kind.

[–] [email protected] 33 points 2 days ago (4 children)

Looks like a German bunker on Omaha Beach to me

[–] [email protected] 2 points 23 hours ago* (last edited 21 hours ago)

I believe it's in Guernsey, C.I.

ed: it's a German WW2 coastal naval range finding tower. Used for fire control of coastal guns shooting 25 miles out to sea.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 days ago

For me it's cylons.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago

Brutalist architecture in a nutshell

[–] [email protected] 12 points 2 days ago

BUT WITH THE POWER OF FLEX TAPE

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 days ago

They're the same picture

load more comments
view more: next ›