this post was submitted on 09 Apr 2025
113 points (95.9% liked)

News

28578 readers
3238 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 21 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 60 points 3 days ago (2 children)

armed with a handgun. After officers ordered Shriner to drop the firearm, she refused numerous times, and pointed the handgun toward the officers

  1. Provide bodycam footage to prove this.
  2. If she actually did, she is a super dumb dumb. Dafuq you point a gun at cops? Drugs or suicide or just stupid.
[–] [email protected] 45 points 3 days ago

Yeah, especially LAPD. They can't even be trusted with footage.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I think that it was dark and she didn’t know they were cops.

Maybe she just saw men roaming around the yard in the dark and acted accordingly.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 days ago

Most likely this plus they were shining flashlights in her eyes so she couldn't see anything. Cops have murdered numerous people with this tactic.

[–] [email protected] 41 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Remember the police public statements are lies 99% of the time.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

There is really no need to make up absurd numbers when the real number is already way too high.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 days ago
[–] [email protected] 10 points 2 days ago

Shot in officer involved shooting?

Shot by a police officer.

[–] [email protected] 27 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I bet, or at least hope the LAPD lies crumble on this one and the charges get dropped/reduced.

" LAPD officers approached the back of a home where one of the suspects was seen running and Shriner reportedly appeared in the yard of a nearby residence, armed with a handgun. After officers ordered Shriner to drop the firearm, she refused numerous times, and pointed the handgun toward the officers, per the news release, and a shootout took place during which Shriner was struck by gunfire and retreated back into her residence."

So you know what really happened is that a few dark unknown people where storming around in her back yard in the middle of the night and one of them screamed at her to "drop the gun" before opening fire against her for being armed in her back yard.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 3 days ago

Yeah booking her for attempted murder is fucking ridiculous.

When they say “a shootout took place”, they probably just mean that cops, in the dark, shot her. $100 says she never fired, AND that she did not know they were cops.

Americans thinking that they have rights with their cute little second amendment is laughable.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 2 days ago

Body cam or the police are guilty

[–] [email protected] 26 points 3 days ago

I'll believe it when I see the video.

[–] [email protected] 20 points 3 days ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] -1 points 3 days ago

Or maybe ...dope nose.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 3 days ago (1 children)

If she wasn’t involved in the hit & run, I can’t understand why she’d point the gun at them. Definitely need to see that body cam footage.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 3 days ago

Or maybe cops shouldn’t be stalking around in someone’s yard.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Even if this is all true, is it normal to be charged with attempted murder just for pointing a gun at someone? Isn’t that usually called brandishing?

[–] [email protected] 13 points 3 days ago

It is normally brandishing unless she fired the weapon. The artical says there was a gunfight but only mentions police shooting. This artical is written like an 8th grader wrote it on their way to school.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 3 days ago