this post was submitted on 06 Apr 2025
607 points (99.2% liked)

politics

22873 readers
3884 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

At a Lafayette, Indiana anti-Trump rally Saturday, a man pulled an assault-style rifle after clashing with protesters who blocked his truck at a Third Street intersection.

Video shows the man in a MAGA hat yelling at protesters, prompting another man—angered by the confrontation with women—to intervene.

The two exchanged shouts before the protester headbutted the man. He returned to his truck, retrieved a rifle, and reentered the crowd.

Police detained but released him, citing self-defense. The “Hands Off!” rally drew nearly 1,000 people and ended early amid safety concerns.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 10 points 6 days ago (1 children)

If the game is about driving around with a gun, provoking people into hitting you, and then going back and getting your gun to kill them, it would be very easy to go around deleting Trump supporters. You know, if not for the police / government being on their side.

That dude could've stayed in his truck and waited for people to walk by. Instead he ended up bloody and teary-eyed. And he's the one with the fucking assault rifle.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 6 days ago

Bullies aren’t used to people hitting back. They’re so scared of losing face they’d rather carry a gun and possibly kill someone to prove what a badass they are.

[–] [email protected] 336 points 1 week ago (7 children)

If you can leave the situation safely - like being able to go back to your truck - it’s not self defense.

[–] [email protected] 225 points 1 week ago (2 children)

yup. as soon as he grabbed the gun and went back to threaten people with it.. he committed the felony.

[–] [email protected] 58 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Louder. For the people in the back.

[–] [email protected] 51 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Fat fuck wants to be another Rittenhouse

[–] [email protected] 2 points 6 days ago

Vyle Shitsinhouse.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

Remember when Rittenhouse got away with it 😆

This whole post is filled with people squeaking about what the rules are. Like what the fuck

[–] [email protected] 44 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Tell that to the police...

[–] [email protected] 37 points 1 week ago

They are too busy ~~fabricating~~... ~~planting~~... finding the evidence they need to arrest some protestors.

[–] [email protected] 67 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

Doesn't matter. They even determined that planning to get yourself in an unsafe situation with the purpose of shooting protesters, travelling across states with a gun to again very intentionally get yourself in a situation where you'd need to use it, is still self defense. Even when you shoot someone without actually being in danger, it becomes self defense when other people are trying to stop you. All of this, as long as your victims are protesting against right-wing policies, has been determined in court to be self defense.

[–] [email protected] 36 points 1 week ago

Only if you're white and conservative.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 64 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Self-defense isn't going back to your vehicle to get a weapon to come back and terrorize people. That's assault.

If he had returned with his weapon, and someone killed him, THAT would be self-defense.

[–] [email protected] 38 points 1 week ago

Exactly. It's obvious who the cops were siding with here.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 120 points 1 week ago (8 children)

How does going back to your vehicle and retrieving a n assault rifle count as self defense? That's premeditated at that point if he were to use it.

The difference between this, and any other mass shooting is just whether this guy decided to pull the trigger, which he obviously wanted too.

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] [email protected] 107 points 1 week ago (6 children)

Self-defense requires there to be an ongoing threat to your or someone else's immediate safety. If he was able to leave the altercation, head to his truck to retrieve his rifle, and then return to the situation that's not self-defense, its premeditation.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

I fucking love you guys. Like your head in a book being like awksuelly...

Reality is that guy could have killed that protestor and charges would be dropped. If not, trump would pardon him. There are no consequences

Stop trying to be correct. Just fucking win for a change. Being correct is not a win in today's world. Way too many people that are wrong who keep winning.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

Stand your ground laws have completely wrecked the premise surrounding threats and threat avoidance. Now it’s people being assholes and escalating the assholery until someone gets pissed and throws a punch and then the shooting starts. Doesn’t matter if it’s road rage or fighting over a parking space. No consideration that anyone involved could have walked away at any point before things got bad.

The duty to retreat and use a firearm as a last resort is dying a quick death in most red states. Even in NY where shooting someone in self defense was often a trip straight to jail now ends up with people not being charged.

Basically, you need to Han Solo the thing most times these days. Shoot first and you’re not guilty.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 99 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Inserts himself into a situation he wasn’t invited to, or welcome at, instigates people for the purpose of “justified” retaliation- whips out his loaded lib-killer , and is summarily released by law enforcement.

I’d say those folks dun’ got Rittenhoused!

[–] [email protected] 46 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I agree with you. That's not how "self-defense works". If the snowflake geot hit, walks away from the situation, gets armed, and returns to attack the person that attacked such a fragile sheep, this is not self-defense, it's retaliation.

The sheep crybaby and whoever proclaimed this as self-defense are just a bunch of puppets.

[–] [email protected] 41 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (3 children)

That’s most likely why the police changed the order of events around:

"During the event, an adult male driver attempted to make a lawful turn at the intersection of Third Street andColumbia Street when his path was obstructed by protesters standing in the roadway. A verbal altercationensued between the driver and protesters," the release said. "The situation escalated when the driver exited his vehicle and was subsequently pushed and battered by individuals in the crowd. The driver then retrieved a firearm from his vehicle in what he described as an act of self-defense.

"He did not discharge the weapon and promptly returned it to his truck. Shortly after, a male protester approachedthe driver and head-butted him, causing injury," police said.

Even though multiple protesters described it otherwise. ACAB.

Edit: punctuationification

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 82 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Why does it feel like he was a failed attempt at inciting violence in protests to make them look unreasonable?

[–] [email protected] 39 points 1 week ago (2 children)

He fucked around and found out most of them were exceedingly reasonable, except the one that busted his face 😊

[–] [email protected] 24 points 1 week ago

Looks like he slipped

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 69 points 1 week ago

I bet if someone drew a concealed pistol on him after he pulled out his rifle the cops would NOT consider it self defense.

ACAB.

[–] [email protected] 64 points 1 week ago (4 children)

Mr. Mangione was defending himself. Case Dismissed.

[–] [email protected] -3 points 6 days ago

Mangione is so last week buddy. We've moved on. He's old news

[–] [email protected] 36 points 1 week ago (1 children)

He was defending the entire country

[–] [email protected] 39 points 1 week ago (4 children)

He wasn't. Because he didn't kill that CEO. My man's innocent.

Whoever did happen to off that CEO certainly did everyone a favor tho

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 63 points 1 week ago (4 children)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 54 points 1 week ago
[–] [email protected] 44 points 1 week ago (2 children)

So Indiana is a "stand your ground" state. That generally removes any duty to retreat. I'd be curious how they rule when he clearly retreated to his vehicle already, and only then retrieved a weapon, brandished it, and reentered a crowd. If they allow self defense, how far is someone allowed to retreat in order to retrieve a weapon and re-engage? Can I go all the way back to my house and get a gun to defend myself?

Of course this will only be litigated if the public can pressure the prosecutor to press charges. If not it'll be easy for the cops to disproportionately apply that defense to like minded miscreants.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 42 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Self defense would be a headbutt back or fists, not the AmRepublican-14.

[–] [email protected] 40 points 1 week ago (6 children)

there's video, no one was doing anything to him. he got out of his SUV, started yelling at people, returned to the vehicle, got back out with the weapon at his side. self defense would have been (a) for literally anyone to have threatened him and (b) for him to simply leave the scene.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] [email protected] 38 points 1 week ago (2 children)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 35 points 1 week ago

This is what we're up against.

I'll be damned if I let these people continue to run our country

[–] [email protected] 28 points 1 week ago (5 children)

It shocks me every time again, seeing how casually people carry guns in the US

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›