this post was submitted on 06 Apr 2025
607 points (99.2% liked)

politics

31509 readers
2707 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles. Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to US politics and contain quality and original content. Social Media adjacent hosts like Substack are allowed, but ONLY if they tie back to a company/subsidiary. No personal or friend group blogs and no self-promotion. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and re-hosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing other users of being bots or paid actors.
  3. No memes, trolling, misinformation, or low-effort posts/comments (including reposts). If you see posts like this that anger you, do not engage. Report, block, and live a happier life than they do. Any slap-fight is subject to comment removals. Fights full of rule violations will result in temporary bans to cool off.
  4. No manipulating votes via bots or alt accounts; this will result in permanent bans. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in an account ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be permanently banned.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules and use critical thinking when reading, posting, and commenting. Users that repeatedly have comments or posts removed, weaponize reports, or violate the code of conduct, will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users. The reason(s) behind moderator action(s) are publicly available through the Modlog.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

• Register To Vote

• Citizenship Resource Center

• Congressional Awards Program

• Federal Government Agencies

• Library of Congress Legislative Resources

• The White House

• U.S. House of Representatives

• U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

• News

• World News

• Business News

• Political Discussion

• Ask Politics

• Military News

• Global Politics

• Moderate Politics

• Progressive Politics

• UK Politics

• Canadian Politics

• Australian Politics

• New Zealand Politics

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

At a Lafayette, Indiana anti-Trump rally Saturday, a man pulled an assault-style rifle after clashing with protesters who blocked his truck at a Third Street intersection.

Video shows the man in a MAGA hat yelling at protesters, prompting another man—angered by the confrontation with women—to intervene.

The two exchanged shouts before the protester headbutted the man. He returned to his truck, retrieved a rifle, and reentered the crowd.

Police detained but released him, citing self-defense. The “Hands Off!” rally drew nearly 1,000 people and ended early amid safety concerns.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] PixelatedCleric@lemmy.dbzer0.com 82 points 2 years ago (3 children)

Why does it feel like he was a failed attempt at inciting violence in protests to make them look unreasonable?

[–] jared@mander.xyz 39 points 2 years ago (2 children)

He fucked around and found out most of them were exceedingly reasonable, except the one that busted his face 😊

[–] shittydwarf@lemmy.dbzer0.com 24 points 2 years ago

Looks like he slipped

[–] thedruid@lemmy.world 15 points 2 years ago

Well I mean it was a reasonable breakage of said face, since y'know... Nazi.. but your point is valid

[–] barneypiccolo@lemm.ee 9 points 2 years ago

An Agent Provocateur.

[–] ininewcrow@lemmy.ca 5 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Judging by the US rhetoric over the past few years .... protestors of any side for any political movement, whether left or right, legitimate or not, moral or immoral ... are figuring out that you need a gun to stand your ground.

It would be easy to destabilize any protest by just drawing a gun .... then someone else answers the challenge and pulls their own gun ... then more people join in ... next you have a Mexican stand off.... and given enough occurrences you now have a fire fight.

It's so volatile because of the freedom to own guns.

It's like watching a group of people fighting with torches next to an open pool of gasoline.