this post was submitted on 05 Apr 2025
350 points (96.3% liked)

politics

22800 readers
2989 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

For the second time in the less than four months, the US Senate has resoundingly voted in support of continuing the genocide in Gaza by rejecting two resolutions aimed at blocking some $9 billion in weapons to the Israeli government.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] nkat2112@sh.itjust.works 48 points 6 days ago (3 children)

In his speech, Sanders, an agent of US imperialism, observed that the US ruling class’ open support for war crimes in Gaza undercuts attempts by Washington to advance “human rights” arguments to justify US interventions and military actions around the world.

Does anyone know why this site refers to Senator Sanders as an "agent of US imperialism"?

This is very strange and makes it difficult to take this article seriously - which is a shame given the ongoing genocide.

[–] TankovayaDiviziya@lemmy.world 16 points 6 days ago (1 children)

It is a socialist website, they still love to be edgy no matter how old they are.

[–] futatorius@lemm.ee 1 points 2 days ago

And by "socialist," read Trotskyite. Don't expect any socialist thinking that emerged since their wonder boy got an ice axe in the cabeza in 1940.

[–] futatorius@lemm.ee 46 points 6 days ago (1 children)

A correct headline: most of the Democrats and all of the Republicans supported the genocide.

[–] Bacano@lemmy.world 19 points 6 days ago

Even more correct: most of the US government supports genocide, and don't care that their constituents don't.

[–] themaninblack@lemmy.world 50 points 6 days ago (3 children)

WHY is it so fucking hard for them to take a hard line against genocide?? What the fuck. I feel like I’m going crazy watching this.

[–] Solfachord@literature.cafe 10 points 6 days ago (2 children)

I am old enough to remember 9/11. The only reason I can think of is that the US wants Muslims to die and they don't care who does it.

[–] kreskin@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Israel wants muslims to die. The US doesnt give a crap about muslims unless they are paid to or they interrupt oil shipments.

[–] futatorius@lemm.ee 1 points 2 days ago

The US was bankrolling Israel long before 9/11.

[–] wide_eyed_stupid@lemmy.world 4 points 6 days ago (1 children)

That's exactly it. I just don't get it. Seems like a no-brainer to me, but apparently I'm wrong.

I guess it's about money? Or they still think that being against genocide will lose them votes in the future? Or something.

[–] jagged_circle@feddit.nl 5 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

No, its profit. They're making big bucks on the weapon sales.

Over half of the US population is opposed to sending weapons to the Zionists.

[–] ChonkyOwlbear@lemmy.world 38 points 6 days ago (2 children)

It's worth noting that all of the 15 voting to restrict arms sales were Democrats.

[–] Keeponstalin@lemmy.world 16 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (3 children)

These are the 15 Democrats that actually gave a shit about human rights and ending genocide:

Bernie Sanders (Vt.),

Richard Durbin (Ill.),

Martin Heinrich (N.M.),

Mazie Hirono (Hawaii),

Ben Ray Luján (N.M.),

Tim Kaine (Va.),

Andy Kim (N.J.),

Ed Markey (Mass.),

Jeff Merkley (Ore.),

Chris Murphy (Conn.),

Brian Schatz (Hawaii),

Tina Smith (Minn.),

Chris Van Hollen (Md.),

Elizabeth Warren (Mass.),

Peter Welch (Vt.).

Fuck every other Democrat and Republican Senator that voted to support genocide

[–] kreskin@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago

Both Hawaii senators voted for human rights and against genocide! I am pleased. At least we have a tiny sliver of civilization left in the US government. NM too, looks like. Good on you, NM.

[–] ZombiFrancis@sh.itjust.works 6 points 6 days ago (1 children)

So 15% of the senate, 30% of the partizan faction in the Democratic Party feels this way.

It may be that this is an issue that is large enough to be electorally relevant.

[–] Keeponstalin@lemmy.world 4 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)
[–] some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org 26 points 6 days ago

Our government is full of geriatric fucks who are on the wrong side of history. Plus some younger ones on the wrong side. Basically none of them represent the will of the majority of young people. But it's fine, whatever, fuck it.

[–] Gates9@sh.itjust.works 9 points 5 days ago

Do you think Jeffrey Epstein was the first or the only guy blackmailing politicians and officials for Mossad?

[–] yournamehere@lemm.ee 20 points 6 days ago

LOL. "but why do ppl not vote?"

usa is no democracy. it has always been a wet dream for greedy pigs.

throw them out. may the real native americans get their land back.

[–] ToiletFlushShowerScream@lemmy.world 13 points 6 days ago (2 children)

Israel seems to own chuck and therefore Senate Democrats.

[–] futatorius@lemm.ee 2 points 2 days ago

Their supporters are all individually owned. They're not just following worthless, self-serving sack of shit Schumer.

[–] barneypiccolo@lemm.ee -5 points 6 days ago (2 children)

It is a coldly political calculation. The Dems are afraid that if they refuse to facililitate Israeli genocide, then American Jews won't vote for them. At the same time, MAGA Nazis will step right up and pledge to kill every Muslim in the Middle East, and sweep up every vote.

The Dems can't afford to lose a fairly monolithic voting block.

[–] kreskin@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I dont think thats correct-- American Jews are a tiny tiny percentage of the population, about 2%. Then split that across repub and dem, and on dem side, split that number again across pro and anti genocide. Its much less than the muslim vote, which is more monlithic on this issue. So the dems lose more votes supporting genocide. About half of DNC money comes from AIPAC, is the real problem.

[–] barneypiccolo@lemm.ee 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Valid observations.

However, many elections are decided by less than 1%, so losing an entire 2% block could hurt, and Jews tend to vote in higher numbers than the average.

But yeah, there are other factors at play, but the vote is always the bottom line, and the Dems can't afford to lose this historically reliable demographic.

[–] kreskin@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

losing the 1% jewish vote but gaining a much larger number progressives and muslim votes seems like a bad trade to you?

Just getting genocide off of the dem's platform would guarantee a win. Do Dems want to win or do they want AIPAC checks, is what the question becomes. So far they want AIPAC checks.

And are you saying that if the dems come out against genocide they will lose every jewish vote? So you think they all support genocide?

[–] barneypiccolo@lemm.ee 1 points 2 days ago

Look, none of this is MY thinking, this is their thinking, and politicians tend to have really twisted concepts about what makes a candidate electable.

For decades, I've been screaming for bold leadership from Dems, and either they've been weak weenies like Schumer, or Republican-Lite like Clinton and Obama. Clearly, they don't have a clue what makes people vote for them.

[–] OmegaLemmy@discuss.online 10 points 6 days ago

Alternatively both parties benefit from this genocide, which seems more likely

[–] GoodOleAmerika@lemmy.world 6 points 5 days ago (1 children)

If I have to vote for mid term, likely third party. Then Democrats have that Pikachu face. They have been compromised

[–] EndlessNightmare@reddthat.com 4 points 5 days ago

They have been compromised

That's exactly. They have been compromised by a foreign government.

[–] Triasha@lemmy.world 5 points 6 days ago

Senate Democrats couldn't overwhelm anything right now.

[–] eugenevdebs@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 6 days ago

"Democrats are completely different than Republicans, they want to help people! Anyone saying otherwise supports Trump and is a useful idiot!"

Adding this to the list of things Democrats and Republicans agree on, in 2025.

[–] BookSnob@lemmy.ca 3 points 6 days ago

This is why Canada doesn’t want any of you cunts here.

[–] floofloof@lemmy.ca 155 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (3 children)

Isn't it lovely that, in these times of polarization, division and conflict, all of Congress can come together and join hands in the common cause of genocidal slaughter of innocents.

[–] futatorius@lemm.ee 2 points 2 days ago

When has a bipartisan bill not been an attack on human rights or basic decency?

[–] grue@lemmy.world 55 points 1 week ago (1 children)

And of getting bribed and/or blackmailed by AIPAC.

[–] WhatAmLemmy@lemmy.world 13 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

Fascists support fascists and dictators. That's why Trumps only allies are Russia, NK, SA, Turkey, and Israel.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] BigMacHole@lemm.ee 74 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Good! We wouldn't Want to ALIENATE the REPUBLICANS who will NEVER Vote for Us!

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] limer@lemmy.dbzer0.com 52 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Truly a victory for bipartisanship

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments