this post was submitted on 05 Apr 2025
268 points (99.6% liked)

politics

22983 readers
3686 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary:


A federal judge ruled Friday that the president violated a court order to stop freezing federal funds by withholding Federal Emergency Management Agency relief to at least 19 states. The judge said that the Trump administration seemed to be making a “covert” effort to punish states whose immigration practices differed from the White House.

U.S. District Judge John McConnell issued an injunction in March on behalf of 23 states that sued the federal government after the White House moved to pause aid to states, ruling that the move ​​“fundamentally undermines the distinct constitutional roles of each branch of our government.”

On Friday, McConnell found that the Trump administration disregarded the court order, with at least 19 states, all of whom with Democratic attorneys general, presenting “undisputed evidence” that they were not receiving FEMA funds already appropriated by Congress.

Oregon, for example, still hasn’t received $120 million in funds meant for winter storms, flooding, landslides, wildfires, and flood mitigation. Hawaii said FEMA has yet to deliver $6 million to rebuild after wildfires devastated Maui in 2023.


top 19 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Gordito@lemmy.world 51 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (3 children)

The repercussion is that some states won't benefit by staying in a United States of America anymore. Already California is looking to circumvent tariffs by negotiating directly with other countries. You're witnessing the beginning of a secession, state by state, of the United States of America.

[–] knightly@pawb.social 21 points 2 weeks ago

Balkanization in America. This is gonna suuck.

[–] AlecSadler@sh.itjust.works 15 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

California comprises 14% of America's GDP. I hope they secede.

[–] barneypiccolo@lemm.ee 5 points 1 week ago

Add Oregon and Washington. Then they can form an alliance with Canada and Mexico, and the United States will be mostly surrounded.

I also think that at some point, Putin is going to demand the return of Alaska, and HitlerPig will consider it, or maybe even do it. So maybe Alaska can join the alliance, too. They can use their oil to fund their economy.

[–] errer@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

The question is how will CA circumvent the tariffs? Reimburse them? But then I’ll be on the hook for the reimbursement as a CA taxpayer…and I’m still expected to pay federal taxes.

[–] vaultdweller013@sh.itjust.works 6 points 2 weeks ago

Probably just telling the state agents to no longer report to the IRS or the feds in general, reminder that the federal government and especially the IRS is heavily reliant on state and local officials. It's entirely possible that the state could just give incentives to the port authorities that out weigh the risks of fucking over the feds.

Can't levy tariffs if ya don't know what's going in or out. Also it's a fine excuse to fuck over customs.

[–] Brkdncr@lemmy.world 5 points 2 weeks ago

States control their own taxes and subsidies even if there are federal tariffs.

[–] Jhex@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

Can't they pull a Trump and just ignore the tariffs?

[–] PortoPeople@lemm.ee 18 points 2 weeks ago

This is civil war/secession type stuff.

[–] FahrenheitGhost@lemmy.world 16 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Show me the repercussions....

[–] HellsBelle@sh.itjust.works 14 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)
[–] 4am@lemm.ee 11 points 2 weeks ago

Can New England join too please

[–] kn33@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Minnesota getting left out in the cold

[–] kreskin@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

Minnesota sharesa a border with Canada, that might work out.

[–] BigMacHole@lemm.ee 13 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Uh oh! ANGRY LETTER INCOMING! You do NOT Screw with the Judiciary if you CANT Read because you'll have to READ their MEAN Letters!

[–] kreskin@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

I do love a good spicy sternly worded letter. This may be the best thing to happen for the US public in a long time.

[–] Freshparsnip@lemm.ee 6 points 1 week ago (1 children)

What are the consequences?

[–] kreskin@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Some rebukes. Maybe even some slammings. Not from dem leaders though, they'll be cowering in the corner waiting for the votes to come to them, or for orders to come down from AIPAC HQ.

[–] SoftestSapphic@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago

If they aren't physically restrained and put in a cell then there isn't a punishment and there's nothing stopping them.