this post was submitted on 28 Feb 2026
421 points (95.7% liked)

politics

31034 readers
1915 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles. Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to US politics and contain quality and original content. Social Media adjacent hosts like Substack are allowed, but ONLY if they tie back to a company/subsidiary. No personal or friend group blogs and no self-promotion. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and re-hosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing other users of being bots or paid actors.
  3. No memes, trolling, misinformation, or low-effort posts/comments (including reposts). If you see posts like this that anger you, do not engage. Report, block, and live a happier life than they do. Any slap-fight is subject to comment removals. Fights full of rule violations will result in temporary bans to cool off.
  4. No manipulating votes via bots or alt accounts; this will result in permanent bans. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in an account ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be permanently banned.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules and use critical thinking when reading, posting, and commenting. Users that repeatedly have comments or posts removed, weaponize reports, or violate the code of conduct, will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users. The reason(s) behind moderator action(s) are publicly available through the Modlog.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] shittydwarf@sh.itjust.works 114 points 6 months ago (4 children)

That 30% of Americans are never going to not support him

[–] Lucky_777@lemmy.world 52 points 6 months ago (2 children)

Yep, that's the base cult right there. They will always support him. He could rape their own children and they would still support him

[–] HeadfullofSoup@kbin.earth 24 points 6 months ago (1 children)

He could do it in front of them while the child ask for help and they would still support him there is no coming back for them

[–] WhatAmLemmy@lemmy.world 10 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

This is how they help the child rape victims

drown

[–] bitjunkie@lemmy.world 6 points 6 months ago (1 children)

No he couldn't. Maybe 20 years ago.

[–] Lodespawn@aussie.zone 12 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Hey, thats not fair, he could totally give them hand jobs two at a time

[–] ickplant@lemmy.world 17 points 6 months ago (2 children)
[–] nonentity@sh.itjust.works 4 points 6 months ago

That’s the middle-out optimisation. 4 at a time, tip-to-tip.

[–] madcaesar@lemmy.world 2 points 6 months ago

In the age of AI I can't believe he's not deep throating two massive cocks

[–] CADmonkey@lemmy.world 42 points 6 months ago (3 children)

We need to stop worrying about those who support him no matter what. 30% of Germans supported Hitler right up to the day he shot himself. You can't reach some people. Stop wasting effort on them.

[–] GuyFawkesV@lemmy.world 15 points 6 months ago (1 children)

The level of lawlessness Trump has wrought should disqualify his voters from having that privilege ever again.

I will die on that hill.

[–] TrickDacy@lemmy.world 5 points 6 months ago

I wish we could make that happen.

[–] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 5 points 6 months ago

They actually supported him after he died, well into the 70s and 80s.

[–] ohulancutash@feddit.uk 2 points 6 months ago

It was a looot more than 30%

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 3 points 6 months ago

Yep. I'll be surprised if his numbers fall through the Sarah Palin Floor. Or the Nixon Resignation Floor.

[–] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 1 points 6 months ago

Yeah, good news more than 30% won't vote so he is Presidente da vida.