this post was submitted on 23 Feb 2026
114 points (92.5% liked)

Ask Lemmy

38082 readers
1292 users here now

A Fediverse community for open-ended, thought provoking questions


Rules: (interactive)


1) Be nice and; have funDoxxing, trolling, sealioning, racism, and toxicity are not welcomed in AskLemmy. Remember what your mother said: if you can't say something nice, don't say anything at all. In addition, the site-wide Lemmy.world terms of service also apply here. Please familiarize yourself with them


2) All posts must end with a '?'This is sort of like Jeopardy. Please phrase all post titles in the form of a proper question ending with ?


3) No spamPlease do not flood the community with nonsense. Actual suspected spammers will be banned on site. No astroturfing.


4) NSFW is okay, within reasonJust remember to tag posts with either a content warning or a [NSFW] tag. Overtly sexual posts are not allowed, please direct them to either !asklemmyafterdark@lemmy.world or !asklemmynsfw@lemmynsfw.com. NSFW comments should be restricted to posts tagged [NSFW].


5) This is not a support community.
It is not a place for 'how do I?', type questions. If you have any questions regarding the site itself or would like to report a community, please direct them to Lemmy.world Support or email info@lemmy.world. For other questions check our partnered communities list, or use the search function.


6) No US Politics.
Please don't post about current US Politics. If you need to do this, try !politicaldiscussion@lemmy.world or !askusa@discuss.online


Reminder: The terms of service apply here too.

Partnered Communities:

Tech Support

No Stupid Questions

You Should Know

Reddit

Jokes

Ask Ouija


Logo design credit goes to: tubbadu


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Everybody knows about the backstory, there was a civil war, KMT fled to Taiwan creating two Chinas sort of, maybe, neither recognises the other, whole thing. ROC (Taiwan) ended up transitioning from military rule to a multi-party democracy, while the PRC (mainland China) didn't do that (they did reform economically, "socialism with Chinese characteristics" and all that, but still a one-party state, not a multi-party democracy). The status quo right now is that Taiwan is in the grey area of statehood where they function pretty much independently but aren't properly recognised, and both sides of the strait are feeling pretty tense right now.

Taiwan's stance on the issue is that they would like to remain politically and economically independent of mainland China, retaining their multi-party democracy, political connections to its allies, economic trade connections, etc. Also, a majority of the people in Taiwan do not support reunification with China.

China's stance on the issue is that Taiwan should be reunified with the mainland at all costs, ideally peacefully, but war is not ruled out. They argue that Taiwan was unfairly separated from the mainland by imperial powers in their "century of humiliation". Strategically, taking Taiwan would be beneficial to China as they would have better control of the sea.

Is it even possible for both sides to agree to a peaceful solution? Personally, I can only see two ways this could go about that has the consent of both parties. One, a reformist leader takes power in the mainland and gives up on Taiwan, and the two exist as separate independent nations. Or two, the mainland gets a super-reformist leader that transitions the mainland to a multi-party democracy, and maybe then reunification could be on the table, with Taiwan keeping an autonomous status given the large cultural difference (similar to Hong Kong or Macau's current status). Both options are, unfortunately, very unlikely to occur in the near future.

A third option (?) would be a pseudo-unification, where Taiwan becomes a recognised country, but there can be free movement of people between the mainland and Taiwan, free trade, that sort of stuff (sort of like the EU? Maybe?). Not sure if the PRC would accept that.

What are your thoughts on a peaceful solution to the crisis that both sides could agree on?

edit: Damn there are crazies in both ends of the arguments. I really don't think giving Taiwan nukes would help solve the problem.

I think the current best solution, looking at the more reasonable and realistic comments, seems to be to maintain the status quo, at least until both sides of the strait are able to come into some sort of agreement (which seems to be worlds away right now given their current very opposing stances on the issue)

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] zbyte64@awful.systems 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

International law is what the CCP claims gives them the right. So no, I am not implying, I am stating it is relevant. Even if you disagree with the law, how do you expect this to be resolved peacefully without international law?

[–] LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net -1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

I don't expect it to be resolved peacefully. Imperialism rarely is.

Edit: also, the UN is a joke. It's just a tool the security council uses to bully other nations. It exists entirely for their benefit. This is like pointing to law under monarchy to support the king's position. It's totally circular.

[–] Wakmrow@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Imperialism? How is this imperialism?

[–] LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net 3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

World power attempting to subordinate and subsume its neighbor by threats of invasion? How is it not imperialism?

Arguably the US's defense of Taiwan is also imperialist but a more benign form than the CPC's actions here. The Taiwanese people are just pawns in the struggle for global domination.

[–] Tetragrade@leminal.space 2 points 20 hours ago

Please consult the graph:

[–] Wakmrow@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Are you unaware of the history of Taiwan? How it became "independent"?

[–] LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net 0 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I am familiar. How is that relevant here?

[–] Wakmrow@lemmy.world 0 points 1 day ago (1 children)

How is it relevant? Are you serious? How are you claiming this is imperialism? It's an island that a murderous dictator fled to after losing a bloody civil war. It was then recognized as "China" at the UN for years. Like how is reunification==imperialism in your mind?

[–] LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net 0 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Forceful conquering by military might or other coersion means makes it imperialism. There is no history that could make it otherwise.

[–] Wakmrow@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net 2 points 1 day ago

What if I am? Very ageist question.