this post was submitted on 09 Feb 2026
13 points (51.1% liked)

Comic Strips

22357 readers
1422 users here now

Comic Strips is a community for those who love comic stories.

The rules are simple:

Web of links

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
13
The same rights (lemmy.world)
submitted 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) by FelixCress@lemmy.world to c/comicstrips@lemmy.world
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] dadarobot@lemmy.sdf.org 52 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

In my state they changed the rules where a cyclist can treat a stop sign like a yeild sign, and a stop light like a stop sign. 

the reasoning is this will encourage cyclists to ride through neighborhoods rather than on busier main streets. cyclists need to maintain momentum when riding, and stopping every couple blocks for a stop sign is a huge momentum killer. 

obviously cyclists run a much higher risk of injury in a traffic accident than a driver. also cyclists dont really have blind spots the way cars do. so generally if a cyclist runs a stop, they have already checked for oncoming traffic. yes, there are idiots out there both driving and cycling, but typically if you saw a cyclist run a stop sign, he knows youre there and went when it was safe. 

[–] naught101@lemmy.world 21 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

That's a great law. That's basically how I use them (with lots of care, obviously).

Which state?

[–] Dearth@lemmy.world 13 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Idaho was the first to do this. Not sure which other states have followed suit, but i think i remember 1 or 2 doing so

[–] plecks@programming.dev 1 points 1 week ago

Washington State made this change about 5 years ago.

[–] RedStrider@lemmy.world 11 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

yesss, maintaining momentum is an overlooked part of cycling. obviously don't just ignore traffic rules completely and blow through intersections, but losing all momentum especially before a big hill SUCKS

then you have to reaccelerate to speed match the cars around you, honestly it feels unsafe on the faster streets.

[–] Ziglin@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Sounds like a cool law but necessarily very safe.

[–] Hawke@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

I assume you meant not necessarily. If so: it's actually safer because it means you spend less time in the line of fire, plus additional options to avoid a potential collision.