News
Welcome to the News community!
Rules:
1. Be civil
Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.
2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.
Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.
3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.
Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.
4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.
Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.
5. Only recent news is allowed.
Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.
6. All posts must be news articles.
No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.
7. No duplicate posts.
If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.
8. Misinformation is prohibited.
Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.
9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.
All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.
10. Don't copy entire article in your post body
For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.
view the rest of the comments
Everybody with a bit of sense predicted this would happen.
It's also why anybody with a bit of sense knew the EV subsidies were important if we wanted American car companies to be competitive in the future. Instead our "America First" president handed China the future of automotive manufacturing.
Also the oil industry is still heavily subsidized, so now you have American OEMs fighting a subsidized oil industry, and a subsidized Chinese EV industry.
Their EVs are gonna get fucked at both ends.
The end result is the US auto industry as a whole being left behind by the rest of the world as other countries expand EV infrastructure and limit or even eliminate fossil fuels across the board.
Those who forced free market capitalism on other nations don't like free market capitalism anymore lmao
It's never been free market capitalism. Subsidies and anti trust have been around for a very long time. That's also because free markets would never work without regulation.
Well, Venezuela will be forced to have free market capitalism so Chevron can exploit its natural resources.
I'd rather it not be Tesla at the forefront. They did some admittedly good things in the beginning to help normalize EVs and build out charging infrastructure.
But I'm not a fan of their vehicle design (interior or exterior), have concerns about their QC and after-sale service, and I won't buy one as long as Musk is at the helm.
That's not a reason to nuke the EV industry as a whole though. Removing the tax incentive for all EVs did exactly that.
My apologies if that is what my comment implied.
I actually think the EV tax bonuses were at least attempting to level the playing field, with tax credits being limited per manufacturer.
Tesla and the American EV industry was already very heavily subsidized. At least up until near the end of 2025.
To claim Tesla wasn't heavily subsidized already when they made model S is very ignorant.
I didn't claim they weren't. I in fact just did the opposite and said they were in order to try to secure American manufacturing in the future and instead Trump pulled the plug.
OK then we are in agreement.
Well, stock holders don't believe this will affect TSLA share price. Robotaxi and Optimus will replace the revenue stream lost on Tesla EVs.
I'll invest all my savings, my wife's savings and kids college funds in TSLA. 😉
edit: added emoji.
TSLA share prices never had a real correlation to their EV sales. Tesla sells promises, EV cars are a byproduct.
There was actually a super brief window that it did. When they started successfully making the model3/y and everything was growing and profits were high, they actually caught up to their insane PE ratio to a reasonable tech multiple.
It was a very small window though, like 1 or 2 quarters and then it became evident the growth was not going to continue and profits started coming down.
It’s insane, the crazy high PE ratio was predicated on the idea that Tesla would be the only game in town for EVs or self-driving cars worldwide, but now both of those are obviously not happening I can only conclude there’s some sort of sunk cost fallacy at play.
That's decidedly reckless, you are investing in unproven products that demonstrably don't work yet, and neither Robotaxi or Optimus will ever get anywhere.
That... that was the joke.
I suspected that might be a joke, but there was no indication, and there are actually a lot of people who are that crazy.
So even without invoking Poe's law, that was far from obvious.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Poe%27s_law
Personally I would have put a /s after such a comment.