this post was submitted on 14 Dec 2025
832 points (98.1% liked)

People Twitter

8770 readers
530 users here now

People tweeting stuff. We allow tweets from anyone.

RULES:

  1. Mark NSFW content.
  2. No doxxing people.
  3. Must be a pic of the tweet or similar. No direct links to the tweet.
  4. No bullying or international politcs
  5. Be excellent to each other.
  6. Provide an archived link to the tweet (or similar) being shown if it's a major figure or a politician. Archive.is the best way.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] _Nico198X_@europe.pub 29 points 1 week ago (4 children)

what's to stop one from benefiting from the honey pot, but feeding them false information?

[–] ChickenLadyLovesLife@lemmy.world 38 points 6 days ago (1 children)

I used to work for a large defense contractor as a consultant. The best way to damage China would have been to let the spies see everything and hope they implemented the same fucked-up shit over there.

[–] Warl0k3@lemmy.world 21 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Describe the technical specifics of your job in a way that misleads them as to the actual information you're working with, but that won't be immediately obvious to an expert that's potentially even more familiar with the source material you're working with than you are.

It's just hard to keep that kind of lie going - it's not impossible, but fooling someone with an entire intelligence agency requires a whole lot of both luck and planning.

There are very few optimal ways to do something. There are an infinite number of wrong ways.

[–] Ilovethebomb@sh.itjust.works 1 points 6 days ago

That's absolutely been done before, giving spies false information. Not sure if it's ever been done via honeypot, who knows.

[–] thespcicifcocean@lemmy.world 20 points 1 week ago (1 children)

apparently counterintel is really hard to do, according to some other lemmy comment i read before somewhere.

[–] BilSabab@lemmy.world 18 points 1 week ago

it is case-dependent. not every honeypot operation is about gaining intelligence. some are just to discredit someone.