this post was submitted on 30 Nov 2025
1433 points (99.0% liked)

Science Memes

17812 readers
1838 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Meron35@lemmy.world 33 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

Low key this is a great way to convince people to switch away from fossil fuels.

Most people seemingly don't know that coal/gas stations work by essentially boiling water. Most are horrified at how trashy and underdeveloped the concept is compared to high tech alternatives like solar, wind, or hydro.

[–] Geobloke@aussie.zone 24 points 3 weeks ago (5 children)

Well, hydro is just spinning water again, wind is spinning air. Solar is stealing electrons from the sun (i think?) So that's cool

[–] tja@sh.itjust.works 23 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Well, the sun is sending them to us, so it's not really stealing!

[–] scutiger@lemmy.world 1 points 3 weeks ago

I promise I'll return them when I'm done with them.

[–] mojofrododojo@lemmy.world 21 points 3 weeks ago

stealing

reappropriating :D

[–] SirHery@lemmy.world 11 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Getting electronics knocked around by photons.

[–] SavinDWhales@lemmy.world 3 points 3 weeks ago

Domestic Appliance Violence

[–] j5906@feddit.org 6 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)

Agree, the quantum-chem of it is amazing... Then again, solar has an efficiency of ~30% compared to the 90% for spinning steam

[–] crater2150@feddit.org 10 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

I don't think it makes sense to compare those efficiencies, as one is for converting heat to electricity, while the other is for converting sunlight. If you use sunlight to heat water and then use that for a steam turbine, the efficiency is similar to a photovoltaic panel. The efficiency numbers are still useful, but only when they refer to the same starting point for the conversion (e.g. only comparing things that turn heat into electricity).

[–] j5906@feddit.org 1 points 3 weeks ago

You are right it doesnt really makes sense to compare them that way, it was just what the initial comment was doing. Nuclear fission is in itself only like 30% efficient. There are of course tons of metrics to compare these things, I personally like space-time efficiency or CO2/MWh.

[–] merc@sh.itjust.works 1 points 3 weeks ago

Yeah, it's comparing apples to crabs. It's only looking at the very final stage and ignoring the efficiencies of the fuel, etc.

If you wanted to make the comparison more fair (and also show how bad it is), a coal power plant maybe has an efficiency of 35%. You can calculate that by dividing the thermal energy in by the electric energy out. You feed in enough coal to generate 8MW of heat, which generates 2.8MW of electricity, so 2.8/8 = 0.35. By contrast, a photovoltaic power plant generates say 2kW of electricity with 0 fuel, so it has an efficiency of ∞%.

[–] Geobloke@aussie.zone 4 points 3 weeks ago

But it's all profit baby! Let something else figure out cousin, put 0% effort in and collect the rewards!

[–] mojofrododojo@lemmy.world 1 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

but crucially no moving parts. very little maintenance, especially compared to anything steam driven.

[–] j5906@feddit.org 1 points 3 weeks ago

I am a big solar fan, but the moving part inertia thing is actually great for stabilizing the grid.

[–] KeenFlame@feddit.nu 3 points 3 weeks ago

They pump water through it. The water gives energy, all our energy is hydrogen baby

[–] Cliff@lemmy.world 3 points 3 weeks ago

You can transfer gas to electricity without boiling water. But it is much more efficient to combine it with boiling water