this post was submitted on 17 Nov 2025
69 points (94.8% liked)

Canada

10675 readers
437 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Related Communities


🍁 Meta


🗺️ Provinces / Territories


🏙️ Cities / Local Communities

Sorted alphabetically by city name.


🏒 SportsHockey

Football (NFL): incomplete

Football (CFL): incomplete

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer


💻 Schools / Universities

Sorted by province, then by total full-time enrolment.


💵 Finance, Shopping, Sales


🗣️ Politics


🍁 Social / Culture


Rules

  1. Keep the original title when submitting an article. You can put your own commentary in the body of the post or in the comment section.

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage: lemmy.ca


founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] ValueSubtracted@startrek.website 45 points 2 days ago (5 children)

Well, euthanizing 1/3 of the population would certainly help alleviate the housing crisis...

[–] rekabis@lemmy.ca 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Even if we limit ourselves to homes within city limits (so we aren’t talking about backwoods cabins, here), Canada has about 6 empty homes for every homeless person.

The problem isn’t a lack of homes, the problem is an excess of “investors” looking for a labour-free income stream parasitized off of the backs of the working class.

[–] Arondeus@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Not trying to be argumentative, but I've seen this stat of there being more empty houses than homeless people thrown around a few times with different numbers and no sources given. Do you have a source for those numbers?

[–] Medic8teMe@lemmy.ca 7 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Homelesshub.ca puts homelessness in Canada at 235,000 as of 2024.

https://homelesshub.ca/collection/homelessness-101/how-many-people-homeless-canada/

OECD data via an article at Daily Hive puts empty homes in Canada as of 2021 at 1.34 million homes. Though that number is now thought to be much higher.

https://dailyhive.com/vancouver/canada-over-1-3-million-vacant-homes

Basic math. 5 homes give or take a half or so per homeless person.

[–] Arondeus@lemmy.ca 1 points 10 hours ago

Awesome. Thanks for the links and your effort.

[–] rarsamx@lemmy.ca 0 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

That's not being argumentative. That's being responsible before spreading it. I'm sure the person you replied to confirmed and has the credible sources handy. Right? right?

[–] FreshParsnip@lemmy.ca 18 points 2 days ago (1 children)

"The cheapest thing in the long run would be to shoot all of us"- an old professor of mine

[–] Daryl@lemmy.ca 4 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Seven billion bullets are not cheap.

[–] FreshParsnip@lemmy.ca 5 points 2 days ago

But we'd never have to feed or house anyone again

[–] psycotica0@lemmy.ca 4 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

This CBC article claims that in 2023, in Alberta Canada, a box of 50 9mm rounds cost $13 retail. That's $0.26 a shot. Multiply that by 7 billion and you get $1.8 billion.

I assume Alberta Canada is not the cheapest place to buy 9mm rounds, and that if you were buying 7 billion rounds some kind of economy of scale would kick in, and that you could get a better price even just as wholesale rather than retail. Oh and that's Canadian Dollars. But that's still an upper bound.

$1.8 billion dollars is more than I have, but is not more than anyone has.

Toronto is Canada's largest city, and is the 4th largest city in North America. In 2025 they spent about 1.8 billion Canadian dollars of their budget on "Community and Social Services" alone. That's child services, fire, paramedic, parks and rec, shelters, that sort of stuff.

I'm not advocating for shooting every human on Earth, but for the cost of parks and shelters and ambulances for a single year in the 4th largest city in North America, we could make that happen.

[–] baggins@lemmy.ca 2 points 2 days ago

It's the federal government so we would somehow manage to pay about three times market price for them

[–] Amuletta@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 day ago

"If they are going to die, then better they should do it now to decrease the surplus population."

[–] Darkcoffee@sh.itjust.works 6 points 2 days ago

We're running an experiment on this new product, Soylent Green... Interested in participating?

It would destroy a lot of other parts as well. I would have to bet a number of these people still work some sort of job even if part time, babysit for family members, still provide something to their community in a way. Sadly there are a lot of people who do believe measures to depopulate would be a good thing.