Atheism
Community Guide
Archive Today will help you look at paywalled content the way search engines see it.
Statement of Purpose
- This is a support and conversation community for people who don't believe in gods.
- Superstition hucksters have no reason to subscribe or post here at all.
- If you are looking to debate or proselytize, options will be linked lower in the sidebar.
Acceptable
- Honest questions or conversations.
- Discussions on parenting or advice.
- Struggles, frustrations, coming out.
- Atheist memes. We can have fun!
- News headlines relevant to atheism.
Unacceptable
Depending on severity, you might be warned before adverse action is taken.
- Anything against site rules.
- Illegal and/or NSFW material.
- Troll posts and comments. There will be no attempt to explain what that means.
- Leading questions, agenda pushing, or disingenuous attempts to bait members.
- Personal attacks or flaming.
Inadvisable
- Self promotion or upvote farming.
- Excessive shitposting or off-topic discussion.
Application of warnings or bans will be subject to moderator discretion. Feel free to appeal. If changes to the guidelines are necessary, they will be adjusted.
If you vocally harass or discriminate against any individual member, you will be removed.
Likewise, if you are a member, sympathizer or a resemblant of a group that is known to largely hate, mock, discriminate against, and/or want to take lives of any other group of people, and you were provably vocal about your hate, then you you will be banned on sight.
Provable means able to provide proof to the moderation, and, if necessary, to the community.
~ /c/nostupidquestions
If you want your space listed in this sidebar and it is especially relevant to the atheist or skeptic communities, PM DancingPickle and we'll have a look!
Connect with Atheists
- Matrix: #atheism:envs.net
Help and Support Links
- Freedom From Religion Foundation
- The Secular Therapy Project
- Secular Students Alliance
- Black Nonbelievers
- The Clergy Project
- Atheist Alliance International
- Sunday Assembly
- Atheist Ireland
- Atheism UK
- Atheists United
Streaming Media
This is mostly YouTube at the moment. Podcasts and similar media - especially on federated platforms - may also feature here.
- Atheist Debates - Matt Dillahunty
- Rationality Rules
- Friendly Atheist
- Making Sense with Sam Harris
- Cosmic Skeptic
- Genetically Modified Skeptic
- Street Epistemology
- Armored Skeptic
- NonStampCollector
Orgs, Blogs, Zines
- Center for Inquiry
- American Atheists
- Humanists International
- Atheist Republic
- The Brights
- The Angry Atheist
- History for Atheists
- Rationalist International
- Atheist Revolution
- Debunking Christianity
- Godless Mom
- Atheist Freethinkers
Mainstream
Bibliography
Start here...
...proceed here.
- God is Not Great (Hitchens)
- The God Delusion (Dawkins)
- The End of Faith (Harris)
- Why I Am Not a Christian (Russell)
- Letter to a Christian Nation (Harris)
Proselytize Religion
From Reddit
As a community with an interest in providing the best resources to its members, the following wiki links are provided as historical reference until we can establish our own.
view the rest of the comments
You are nearly there. The decline of religion is replaced by political ideology. Religion has traditionally provided community and a sense of belonging and purpose. Since the advent of scientific revolution, religion has been steadily been declining. Coupled that with the growing individualism, since the promulgation of liberalism, and we have people feeling alienated and purposeless. The scientific revolution and individualist priorities atomised what was once communities and now there are only individuals left to fend for themselves. These vulnerable individuals are easy prey for demagogues who promise to bring back that sense of belonging and togetherness. It is not a coincidence that many rural areas are MAGA and religion is still alive and well. And what's the main characteristic of rural countries? Its loneliness. Hannah Arendt made an insightful conclusion that loneliness is a precursor to totalitarianism.
The extremely liberal and individualistic values that happened in 19th century giving rise to collectivist totalitarianism is repeating again and we haven't learned. Even a lot of Lemmy users don't get this and scoff at the "deplorables", wondering why the poor voted for Trump. He offered a sense of belonging to the poor and alienated, which both centrist Democrats and Republicans abandoned long ago.
It’s you that is nearly there. Your attempt to blame liberalism doesn’t resonate and surely does not seem to have a historical precedent.
The old historical meaning and value of liberalism is emphasis on individuality and private property. Those two come part and parcel together. It is no coincidence that socialism developed as a collectivist response to liberalism. Many people think socialism is only on economic level but socialism is, well, also social. Socialism tries to go back to collectivism; where group well-being is more important than individual. Think about it, why do the slogans "1% vs 99%" and "for the many, not the few" are leftist while centrists shun it? Other ideologies also tried to claim collectivism, namely communism and fascism. These ideologies are anti-liberal in the sense that they are against individualism. Never mind some of the collectivist ideologies are not democratic but that requires another discussion. In any case, you will notice socialists, communists and fascists often use "we" in their rhetoric more than the liberals and centrists alike, because of greater emphasis on collectivism, as in "us" rather than "you" and "I".
I urge you to read more on the historical development of political ideologies, especially on collectivism and individualism. This is not simply left or right, this is also collectivism versus individualism. This is what gets lost on the current discourse and why I think liberals and left lost ground in recent decades, because they don't understand. You don't have to agree, you have to understand. At the very least, progressives like Zohran Mamdani, Bernie Sanders and AO recognised this and they understand, and captured the appreciation of MAGA voters.
If you change the meaning of a word then you can apply behaviors to it that win your argument.
I’m sure you don’t mean to but hiding it inside a collection of other words looks like obfuscation to “sneak” the point in.
I think where you went wrong in your initial hypothesis was when you correlated liberalism to individualism. Individualism is a western affliction and applies to both conservative and liberal demographics.
Ask yourself why liberal Democrats are so against progressives. Ask as well why in liberal cities, there are so many NIMBYs voting against affordable housing despite being "progressive". The individualistic values "sneaks" to economic policies.
It's going to be a lot but I urge you to read on the historical development of liberalism and you'll understand. It then ties to why socialism developed, and later on fascism and communism.
There is deliberate obfuscation by your government and elites to muddy the terms to prevent further mobilisation of people against them. While in other parts of the world, calling one's self a socialist, democratic socialist or social democrats are perfectly fine, it is very much a no-no in the US and Americans instead call themselves progressive.
There we go. I suspected as much. You’re being quite dishonest and it only took you three giant walls of text to let it out.
I don’t debate conservatives. You have nothing to add to my experience. Goodbye.
Precisely what I'm talking about, individualistic.
Just know that liberals in other countries are considered conservatives. Like, Mamdani is considered far left in US, but his policies are normal in Europe.