cross-posted from: https://piefed.blahaj.zone/c/politicalmemes/p/392491/do-you-agree
Do you agree?
this post was submitted on 09 Nov 2025
733 points (99.1% liked)
Flippanarchy
1775 readers
84 users here now
Flippant Anarchism. A lighter take on social criticism with the aim of agitation.
Post humorous takes on capitalism and the states which prop it up. Memes, shitposting, screenshots of humorous good takes, discussions making fun of some reactionary online, it all works.
This community is anarchist-flavored. Reactionary takes won't be tolerated.
Don't take yourselves too seriously. Serious posts go to !anarchism@lemmy.dbzer0.com
Rules
-
If you post images with text, endeavour to provide the alt-text
-
If the image is a crosspost from an OP, Provide the source.
-
Absolutely no right-wing jokes. This includes "Anarcho"-Capitalist concepts.
-
Absolutely no redfash jokes. This includes anything that props up the capitalist ruling classes pretending to be communists.
-
No bigotry whatsoever. See instance rules.
-
This is an anarchist comm. You don't have to be an anarchist to post, but you should at least understand what anarchism actually is. We're not here to educate you.
-
No shaming people for being anti-electoralism. This should be obvious from the above point but apparently we need to make it obvious to the turbolibs who can't control themselves. You have the rest of lemmy to moralize.
Join the matrix room for some real-time discussion.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
A call for human rights that can't be taken away by the first idiot is not anarchism, it's the most basic common sense and logic upon which a good society should be built.
So, they had me up till here. But what I think they're trying to describe is a dual-power relationship between the state and labor, by which the powers of the state are checked by the power of working people. That's an idealistic vision of the future, but it isn't a proven strategy. Just the opposite - its a strategy riddled with more failures than successes.
The belief that we can build a system to self-perpetuate civil rights is at the heart of the anarchist ideology.
But the promise of an immaculate statutory framework that denies any individual or coalition power is a false one. Power is a consequence of social relationships and control of physical capital by individuals. There is no established structure that can prevent a cartel of insiders from seizing control of critical infrastructure. They don't even have to be particularly powerful. Any sufficiently motivated Houthi brigade can shut down the Suez Canal. Any sufficiently popular social media platform can derail a positive social movement (witness what happened to Occupy Wall Street or BLM or the Hong Kong Democracy protests or the disintegration of the Yugoslavian government).
Civil Rights can only ever be aspirational in a world where a local monopoly on violence undoes in days what a community spent generations building.
6/25/1991 Janša and Tuđman blocked Milošević on Twitter, never forget 😞🙏
They didn't mention labor, they are talking about power as in the power the government or a president has
I don't picture anarchism as a system where a statutory framework is put in place
I don't like much this generalization, you are describing the power over control of physical capital, in our scenario the power is granted through law and established through police
Something we can be sure neither established or non-established structure can't change is the truth, nobody can change the fact that 1+1=2, they can only lie about it for some time
It took humans millions or years to learn how to hold a stick, perhaps it just take more time and effort
Anarchism is kind of basic common sense.