this post was submitted on 18 Oct 2025
214 points (90.5% liked)

No Stupid Questions

44434 readers
997 users here now

No such thing. Ask away!

!nostupidquestions is a community dedicated to being helpful and answering each others' questions on various topics.

The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:

Rules (interactive)


Rule 1- All posts must be legitimate questions. All post titles must include a question.

All posts must be legitimate questions, and all post titles must include a question. Questions that are joke or trolling questions, memes, song lyrics as title, etc. are not allowed here. See Rule 6 for all exceptions.



Rule 2- Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material.

Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material. You will be warned first, banned second.



Rule 3- Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here.

Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here. Breaking this rule will not get you or your post removed, but it will put you at risk, and possibly in danger.



Rule 4- No self promotion or upvote-farming of any kind.

That's it.



Rule 5- No baiting or sealioning or promoting an agenda.

Questions which, instead of being of an innocuous nature, are specifically intended (based on reports and in the opinion of our crack moderation team) to bait users into ideological wars on charged political topics will be removed and the authors warned - or banned - depending on severity.



Rule 6- Regarding META posts and joke questions.

Provided it is about the community itself, you may post non-question posts using the [META] tag on your post title.

On fridays, you are allowed to post meme and troll questions, on the condition that it's in text format only, and conforms with our other rules. These posts MUST include the [NSQ Friday] tag in their title.

If you post a serious question on friday and are looking only for legitimate answers, then please include the [Serious] tag on your post. Irrelevant replies will then be removed by moderators.



Rule 7- You can't intentionally annoy, mock, or harass other members.

If you intentionally annoy, mock, harass, or discriminate against any individual member, you will be removed.

Likewise, if you are a member, sympathiser or a resemblant of a movement that is known to largely hate, mock, discriminate against, and/or want to take lives of a group of people, and you were provably vocal about your hate, then you will be banned on sight.



Rule 8- All comments should try to stay relevant to their parent content.



Rule 9- Reposts from other platforms are not allowed.

Let everyone have their own content.



Rule 10- Majority of bots aren't allowed to participate here. This includes using AI responses and summaries.



Credits

Our breathtaking icon was bestowed upon us by @Cevilia!

The greatest banner of all time: by @TheOneWithTheHair!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Its the dumbest fucking advice I've found since everything is centralised and run from head offices but they dont seem to understand thats not a thing

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] gon@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I do have to say I didn’t consider that you might actually like wearing suits.

That's literally the whole point.

Other individuals yes, but not being part of a group.

This is more of a philosophical discussion, I guess.

However, maybe you are in the US?

Nope, I'm European. I'm also much further left than Bernie Sanders, and yeah I definitely see the lack of suits there. It might be a rejection of formality, but I don't know... I'd be much more inclined to say that it is a rejection of the establishment and a way to approximate themselves with everyday people, by dressing more like the average person dresses on a daily basis.

The point of the dress-code in politics, at least partially, is to signal that you are meant to be there. It's supposed to help you be taken more seriously -- this goes in tandem with that thing I said about the suit looking intentional. It also equalizes everyone; By looking similar, you can focus on what they have to say and less on what they're wearing ("Oh look, that politician is wearing a cool shirt... Wait, what did they just say?").

Not wearing a suit definitely brings some eyes your way, which is also a reason some politicians do it -- like Zelenskyy, who's not wearing suits because of the war, but also because it stands out and forces people to think about the war. Still, as you might've seen, the White House was rather upset with him over this; Not wearing a suit signals that you don't belong there, and many people (American fascists or not), are gonna see someone that can't even wear a suit ("Can't even put on a suit, how're they gonna steer a country?").

The suit has meaning. It's communication.

By having rules, this communication becomes clearer. Every deviation matters and is noticed.

Here in Europe it’s definitely often associated with “old money”.

I mean, I just don't see this at all. We might be from different countries (probably), but I just don't get that association at all. It's a suit. It's the uniform of business, as you said, but... Yeah, it's formal. It says special event, or lawyer, or something. Then again, it depends on the suit, so I wouldn't even go that far, frankly. Some suits just say "fashion". That's my opinion, anyway. Maybe it's because over here we have suits as traditional academic wear... Some pictures follow.

Coimbra traje

Porto traje

Oh yes I’m AuDHD so yeah I am definitely neurodivergent.

Yeah you definitely sounded like it, but again I just didn't want to do some virtual-armchair-diagnosis or anything LOL I've heard many neurodivergent people have trouble with clothes and formal events. I have some pretty bad social anxiety, so I relate to that, to a certain extent.

It’s not the people per se but the events and what they represent.

Well, yeah, but those are just shitty events for shitty things. The only event you listed that I would maybe debate was the restaurant, but then again I haven't ever stepped foot in a restaurant with a dress-code.

Well I see they are a different colour but they are essentially the same to me.

The colour is different, the fit is completely different, the shirt is different, and yeah the tie is different (the 2nd suit is wearing a camp collar shirt, which is actually explicitly informal). I mean, pretty much the only thing they have in common is that the pants match the blazer, meaning, they're both suits.

Corduroy suit

Is this the same as well?

To me, they're clearly all completely different, quite frankly. They're all suits, but very different suits for very different occasions.

Well, whatever, I guess.

[–] Bloefz@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

Well yes I thought Zelenskyy looked great in that thing he was wearing. I thought it looked pretty kick-ass. To me personally pissing Trump off would be a feature, not a bug 🤭 But I don't have any responsibility to save a war-torn country of course. There's that. I do agree with Zelenskyy's reasoning, he's not a president who just sits behind a desk to sign papers.

But yes establishment, that's what I associate suits with. That's a better description than "old money" which I said.

For me it tends to have the opposite effect. I remember when my boss always wore this formal stuff and one time we had an issue and she came from home in a hurry to look at it. She was just wearing jeans and a T-shirt and I remember thinking "wow she is actually a nice person" 😆 . But yeah I'm not very (neuro) typical. Though a very typical thing of autistic people is that they love rules and I personally hate them with a passion.

I like the big capes, I sometimes wear them as part of a gothic/alternative outfit, though no suit under it but more like some mesh top. But I wouldn't wear a suit at university if I had to.

And no I do think that last one is very different because the fabric is very fluffy on that one.