this post was submitted on 26 Sep 2025
15 points (71.4% liked)

Ye Power Trippin' Bastards

1589 readers
6 users here now

This is a community in the spirit of "Am I The Asshole" where people can post their own bans from lemmy or reddit or whatever and get some feedback from others whether the ban was justified or not.

Sometimes one just wants to be able to challenge the arguments some mod made and this could be the place for that.


Posting Guidelines

All posts should follow this basic structure:

  1. Which mods/admins were being Power Tripping Bastards?
  2. What sanction did they impose (e.g. community ban, instance ban, removed comment)?
  3. Provide a screenshot of the relevant modlog entry (don’t de-obfuscate mod names).
  4. Provide a screenshot and explanation of the cause of the sanction (e.g. the post/comment that was removed, or got you banned).
  5. Explain why you think its unfair and how you would like the situation to be remedied.

Rules


Expect to receive feedback about your posts, they might even be negative.

Make sure you follow this instance's code of conduct. In other words we won't allow bellyaching about being sanctioned for hate speech or bigotry.

YTPB matrix channel: For real-time discussions about bastards or to appeal mod actions in YPTB itself.


Some acronyms you might see.


Relevant comms

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

I wrote in this post that I'm uncomfortaple to argue "genetical[ly] or genealogical[ly]" why people "belong" in some place or another. I think that's ethno-nationalist reasoning and a "weapon of the enemy" reasoning applies. Even if it's in favour of Palestinians.

But apparently, that's "settler-colonialist apologism" for dessalines. Ethno-nationalism is ok if it's targeting "the right" people, I guess. /s

I think the reasoning of the comment removal is bollocks. Just because I don't want to argue why someone "belongs" someplace because of their genes, I'm not all of a sudden in favour of settler-colonialism.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] mrdown@lemmy.world 17 points 2 months ago (3 children)

I disagree with the removal but you are wrong. Anti settler colonialism in Palestine use this argument of genetics and genealogical because those where exactly the main justification of Zionists forcing a state on the local Palestinians population. Many Zionists claim that they had has the right to create an ethnostate because of 2000 years old Jewish kingdom and continuous presence in the land while at the same time saying Palestinians are just Arab colonizers that should be transferred to other Arab countries while Israel take all the historical Palestine

[–] LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

So wouldn’t it make more sense to completely undermine this idea? Staking a similar claim makes it more debatable since both groups have at least superficially convincing historical narratives in play. And with anti-Palestinian racism being so commonplace in the west, people are biased towards Israeli narratives.

Whereas acknowledging that people always have a right to stay in their homeland just immediately undermines the exile and evictions involved in Israel’s colonialist project. It’s simple and easy to understand and directly rooted in basic human rights that everyone can empathize with.

[–] mrdown@lemmy.world 7 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

No, we are not using the same type of argument to prove us right but to prove them wrong. There is people who really believe Zionists stupidest claims so yes it is important to use the same logic just to prove that the argument is so stupid and contradictory.

[–] LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net 4 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

I just think by engaging in this argument you give it credence, and it’s such a confusing and technical one that most people aren’t going to understand or have the ability to debunk anything, so they’ll just go with their political affiliation.

I mean does the argument that European Jews have a claim to some distant land because some of their ancestors came from there hundreds to thousands of years ago really need to engaged with as a serious argument? I don’t think this really has much weight if you think about it.

Like, I have European ancestry. The implication here is I should be able to go back to those countries and kick someone out of their home just because of this fact? It’s a ridiculous and extremely violent idea. I think that’s going to be a lot easier to get people to see than quibbling about what percent of Jewish ancestors came from here or there.

[–] mrdown@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

I mean does the argument that European Jews have a claim to some distant land because some of their ancestors came from there hundreds to thousands of years ago really need to engaged with as a serious argument?

Considered the amount of time i see this argument on social media show that the argument is a serious argument from zionists so yeah i think it is important to adress it

Just look at the far right demonstration in the uk. They couldn't gather as much people few years ago despite the ideology they hold that no civilized people should accept them

Even a ridiculous theory like fat earth is gaining popularity, 2% of Americans believe in it that's 6 millions people

[–] Prunebutt@slrpnk.net -4 points 2 months ago (1 children)

exactly the main justification of Zionists forcing a state on the local Palestinians population.

IDK. That's at least not the full story, since one main reason that Israel exists is the holocaust. But I don't want to argue over those details.

Many Zionists claim that they had has the right to create an ethnostate because of 2000 years old Jewish kingdom and continuous presence in the land while at the same time saying Palestinians are just Arab colonizers that should be transferred to other Arab countries while Israel take all the historical Palestine

Just because zionists argue with bullshit doesn't make it any better if you use that bullshit argumentation the other way around. Critizise the bullshit by pointing out that it is in fact bullshit. Not by steeping to the bullshitter's level.

[–] mrdown@lemmy.world 9 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

IDK. That's at least not the full story, since one main reason that Israel exists is the holocaust. But I don't want to argue over those details.

Please educate yourself before spewing BS like that. There was no holocaust in 1896 when Herzl talked about forcing a state own Palestinians the local population or during the Belfour declaration . Even if it was true that it was because of the holocaust it's still BS because a genocide committing by German do not justify stealing lands from people who has nothing to do with the holocust

Just because Zionists argue with bullshit doesn't make it any better if you use that bullshit argumentation the other way around. Criticize the bullshit by pointing out that it is in fact bullshit. Not by steeping to the bullshitter's level.

It's not BS to say that Palestinians the local population who are also descendent of the Canaanites and never left that land in response to Zionists advocating that all Palestinians should be kicked out because they claim that they Arab colonizers

[–] Prunebutt@slrpnk.net 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Please educate yourself before spewing BS like that. There was no holocaust in 1896 when Herzl talked about forcing a state own Palestinians the local population or during the Belfour declaration .

Israel wasn't established until 1948. Herzl also proposed Argentinia. The Holocaust was the main trigger that led the UN to greenlight the project Israel.

Even if it was true that it was because of the holocaust it's still BS because a genocide committing by German do not justify stealing lands from people who has nothing to do with the holocust

International politics rarely/never happens because of notionsof justice or fairness, but always out of expedience of the actors involved. It was expedient for the west to establish Israel. Especially for post-war Germany. Look up what Adenauer said about Israel.

It's not BS to say that Palestinians the local population who are also descendent of the Canaanites and never left that land in response to Zionists advocating that all Palestinians should be kicked out because they claim that they Arab colonizers

Where in that argument does genetics come into play?

[–] mrdown@lemmy.world 4 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

Israel wasn't established until 1948. Herzl also proposed Argentinia. The Holocaust was the main trigger that led the UN to greenlight the project Israel.

Why do you keep embarrassing yourself? Herzl ended up picking Palestine in the end. Herzl is referred as the spiritual father of the Jewish State in Israel declaration of independence.

International politics rarely/never happens because of notions of justice or fairness, but always out of expedience of the actors involved. It was expedient for the west to establish Israel. Especially for post-war Germany. Look up what Adenauer said about Israel.

This is besides the point. The point is that the justification to steal land for people who had nothing to do with the holocaust is the biggest BS you can spew

UN decision was based on the reality on the ground in palestine and not the holocust. UN support had zero effect on preventing the creation of israel and helping it creation

Where in that argument does genetics come into play?

Genetics provide information's about a population indigeneity

[–] Prunebutt@slrpnk.net 1 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (2 children)

Disengage.

Edit: I wrote why I wanted to disengaged which could have been interpreted as further antagonization.

[–] db0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 2 months ago

Warning :Do not insult or antagonize further as part of disengaging.