this post was submitted on 17 Sep 2025
24 points (92.9% liked)

Soil Science

689 readers
10 users here now

Welcome to c/soilscience @ slrpunk.net!

A science based community to discuss and learn all things related to soils.



Notice Board

This is a work in progress, please don't mind the mess.



Subdisciplines of soil science include:

These subdisciplines are used by various other disciplines, particularly those related to reclamation, remediation, and agriculture.

Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Be kind and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. Please use a tag.
  4. No spam.
  5. Memes are welcome, but the focus of this community is science-based


Resources

Blogs

Careers

Chemistry

Classification

Maps & Datasets

Canada

Europe

United States

World

Soil Contamination:



Similar Communities


Sister Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Plants and Gardening

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Memes



Find us on Reddit

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Heating alone won’t drive soil microbes to release more carbon dioxide — they need added carbon and nutrients to thrive. This finding challenges assumptions about how climate warming influences soil emissions.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Multiplexer@discuss.tchncs.de 3 points 2 months ago (1 children)

So, is this a good or a bad message for climate change?
On the one hand, it could point to man-made CO2 currently emitted being even higher than we think (as less is contributed by the warmed up soil), which would be bad.
On the other hand, this might reduce the risk of yet another runaway scenario where higher temperatures lead to higher emissions, again leading to higher temperatures (like there is for soils in cold climates and methane emissions).
So, although I am just now not sure how to interpret the results, still a very interesting study!

[–] emergencyfood@sh.itjust.works 3 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

This result says nothing*. Carbon-poor soils will not release more CO2 under warming, since they are carbon-poor. But there are ~1670 petagrams of carbon under the Arctic permafrost (and a little more in Tibet), which could absolutely cause a runaway scenario. For comparison, the atmosphere has about 900 Pg of carbon.

* Okay, that's too harsh. I'm sure this study will help refine the current equations, and could be useful in making local policies.

[–] Multiplexer@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 2 months ago

Sums up and confirms my impression of this.