this post was submitted on 05 Jul 2025
233 points (99.2% liked)
Programmer Humor
24790 readers
676 users here now
Welcome to Programmer Humor!
This is a place where you can post jokes, memes, humor, etc. related to programming!
For sharing awful code theres also Programming Horror.
Rules
- Keep content in english
- No advertisements
- Posts must be related to programming or programmer topics
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
The amount of people on the internet seriously complaining that both Rust error handling sucks and that
.unwrap();
is too verbose is just staggering.I’ll be honest, when I was learning to program in Java I mostly just wrapped errors in an empty try catch to shut them up, with no regard for actually handling them.
I assume most other learners do that too.
Java requiring you to write every exception that can happen in your code isn't helpful.
Explicit error types are great, but Java managed to make them on a way where you get almost none of the upside and is so full of downsides that indoctrinated a generation into thinking knowing your errors is bad.
I think the problem is that many introductory examples use
unwrap
, so many beginner programmers don’t get exposed to alternatives likeunwrap_or
and the likes.