this post was submitted on 03 Jul 2025
51 points (96.4% liked)

No Stupid Questions

42018 readers
1287 users here now

No such thing. Ask away!

!nostupidquestions is a community dedicated to being helpful and answering each others' questions on various topics.

The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:

Rules (interactive)


Rule 1- All posts must be legitimate questions. All post titles must include a question.

All posts must be legitimate questions, and all post titles must include a question. Questions that are joke or trolling questions, memes, song lyrics as title, etc. are not allowed here. See Rule 6 for all exceptions.



Rule 2- Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material.

Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material. You will be warned first, banned second.



Rule 3- Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here.

Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here. Breaking this rule will not get you or your post removed, but it will put you at risk, and possibly in danger.



Rule 4- No self promotion or upvote-farming of any kind.

That's it.



Rule 5- No baiting or sealioning or promoting an agenda.

Questions which, instead of being of an innocuous nature, are specifically intended (based on reports and in the opinion of our crack moderation team) to bait users into ideological wars on charged political topics will be removed and the authors warned - or banned - depending on severity.



Rule 6- Regarding META posts and joke questions.

Provided it is about the community itself, you may post non-question posts using the [META] tag on your post title.

On fridays, you are allowed to post meme and troll questions, on the condition that it's in text format only, and conforms with our other rules. These posts MUST include the [NSQ Friday] tag in their title.

If you post a serious question on friday and are looking only for legitimate answers, then please include the [Serious] tag on your post. Irrelevant replies will then be removed by moderators.



Rule 7- You can't intentionally annoy, mock, or harass other members.

If you intentionally annoy, mock, harass, or discriminate against any individual member, you will be removed.

Likewise, if you are a member, sympathiser or a resemblant of a movement that is known to largely hate, mock, discriminate against, and/or want to take lives of a group of people, and you were provably vocal about your hate, then you will be banned on sight.



Rule 8- All comments should try to stay relevant to their parent content.



Rule 9- Reposts from other platforms are not allowed.

Let everyone have their own content.



Rule 10- Majority of bots aren't allowed to participate here. This includes using AI responses and summaries.



Credits

Our breathtaking icon was bestowed upon us by @Cevilia!

The greatest banner of all time: by @TheOneWithTheHair!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I don't get this, the only argument is the like Austrian school taxation is theft argument but in that case all the taxes that income tax haters like are also just as much theft.

You see a new article every week about why we need to get rid of income tax and replace it with some asinine "progressive consumption tax" that allows for poor people to write some stuff off but not other stuff its a mess.

every inane over complicated solution always runs into either not making enough, being to expensive to enforce and calculate or being regressive

even in Europe which comes the closest to this with the use of vats but income tax is still their main cash cow

this is a solution in search of a problem income tax works, economist agree when done right (as in you don't raise income tax 50% in a day)it has the least distortion, it's easy to collect and raises massive revenue

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Rhynoplaz@lemmy.world 46 points 1 day ago (5 children)

People are self centered, and don't bother to take a deeper look at what is happening.

They get their paycheck and see that the gubment took 24% of their money and feel like they've been robbed.

At no point do they consider the years they spent in public school, or the roads they use to drive to work, or the ever present emergency services that will be available when they are needed.

[–] plz1@lemmy.world 2 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

You had me until the emergency services comment

  • Fire department, available
  • Police, available, you may end up murdered if you are the wrong skin tone
  • Ambulance, available, but you'll be billed for that ride. So what'd taxes pay for there?
  • Mental health services, see Police
  • Emergency room, available, see Ambulance and multiply by 50-100x
[–] Rhynoplaz@lemmy.world 4 points 11 hours ago

Yeah. I'm with you on all of that, but in many places that's not the situation.

[–] db2@lemmy.world 13 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Or that those things should be paid entirely out of business and top 10% taxes because they can afford it. Apparently. 👆

[–] IloveyouMF@lemmy.world 10 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Obviously I agree that the rich should pay more in taxes that is common sense, but the idea we could run an economy without taxing anyone deemed "middle class" is a fantasy.

People love the European welfare state, here is the thing European taxation is way less progressive people of all income brackets pay more in taxes, I am not saying that is wrong but the fact is most Americans would hate it.

In the nordics it is a cultural assumption that everyone pays, yes even poor people.

European income tax rates are way flatter with the top income level kicking in earlier.

[–] db2@lemmy.world 4 points 20 hours ago

but the idea we could run an economy without taxing anyone deemed "middle class" is a fantasy

No it isn't, the US was like that. They taxed everyone to fund a war then put it back, then did it again but didn't put it back because they keep the money and here we are.

[–] 1rre@discuss.tchncs.de 6 points 1 day ago

Idk about you but if the government took 24% of my money I'd be ecstatic, currently it's much closer to 55-60%, a too-big percentage of which goes on privatising profit and nationalising losses.

[–] starlinguk@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Only 24 percent? What the fuck are they whining about?

[–] RBWells@lemmy.world 1 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago)

I looked at my paycheck (US) vs. one of our Swedish colleagues when I was doing our payroll, and yes, the tax was about 45%, my federal withholding is much less but once you add in the deductions for 401k (unsecured pension scheme) and health insurance (that doesn't cover anything except annual wellness until we pay in 8,000 USD) and social security (the fed pension being paid now to old people, and their healthcare) my deductions also leave about 55% of my pay for net pay.

The part I object to most in terms of cost here is the healthcare - my deductions may mirror the Swede but I don't think they also have to cover the first 8k of cost out of pocket.

(Edit - it was Sweden not Denmark)

[–] IloveyouMF@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

Exactly

Trust me if the government had to make up the difference from consumption taxes most people would lose more money to that then income tax, since income tax is predictable it can be optimized better while consumption tax has inherent variance so you have to set it high to be safe.