this post was submitted on 01 Jul 2025
477 points (98.2% liked)

News

30697 readers
3331 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Trump’s immigration crackdown has made many immigrant farm workers scared to go to work

Lisa Tate is a sixth-generation farmer in Ventura county, California, an area that produces billions of dollars worth of fruit and vegetables each year, much of it hand-picked by immigrants in the US illegally.

Tate knows the farms around her well. And she says she can see with her own eyes how raids carried out by agents from US Immigration and Customs Enforcement (Ice) in the area’s fields earlier this month, part of Donald Trump’s immigration crackdown, have frightened off workers.

“In the fields, I would say 70% of the workers are gone,” she said in an interview. “If 70% of your workforce doesn’t show up, 70% of your crop doesn’t get picked and can go bad in one day. Most Americans don’t want to do this work. Most farmers here are barely breaking even. I fear this has created a tipping point where many will go bust.“

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] onslaught545@lemmy.zip 133 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Then pay living wages. It's hard to feel sorry for you when you're crying about losing your slave labor.

[–] Enkers@sh.itjust.works 77 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

This is a problem that's been brewing for a long time. Their business model is untenable at the scale they're at without relying on near slave labour. Their massive profits come more from scale, than absolute margin, so if they actually payed a living wage they'd be in the red.

So now y'all will have to wait until the coming food shortages drive up prices before the pay is enough to interest other Americans that'd otherwise have no interest in those sorts of jobs.

The owners won't play ball without getting their pound of flesh.

[–] blargle@sh.itjust.works 73 points 1 day ago (2 children)

We could subsidize the farms that grow actual food crops picked by humans at a high enough rate that the food is affordable and the workers are paid reasonably well. And do that instead of subsidizing farms that grow feed corn, ethanol corn, and grain/soy for export.

[–] krashmo@lemmy.world 20 points 1 day ago

That sounds like socialist propaganda boy. Get back to greasing that engine.

[–] slaneesh_is_right@lemmy.org -2 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

Food for humans? That's crazy, where does the animal suffering comes into play?

[–] GiuseppeAndTheYeti@midwest.social 3 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago)

In the field. We already addressed that. Humans pick the food in 104° weather in late June/July/August when the wet bulb globe temperature is 95+

[–] ech@lemmy.ca 49 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Every time a ceo whines about how they "can't" do something, everyone should add "...without stopping the siphoning of ever more money to our shareholders and ourselves."