this post was submitted on 01 Jul 2025
446 points (98.9% liked)

Science Memes

20679 readers
1221 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Meta Post Tags



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.


If you are here asking: "Is this a science meme?"

Probably, yes. We use the Dawkins definition of meme: a replicating idea, not just an image macro with a fact on it. A good post here doesn't need to teach you something. It needs to make you ask something: who, what, where, when, and especially why or how.

Science isn't a filing cabinet of facts, it's a conversation. For example, a photo of an eel or other localized wildlife counts because most people never see one, and wonder is the first step of inquiry. A car meme counts if it makes you curious about what's under the bonnet. If you want to talk about something you noticed in the world, chances are someone else wants to talk about it too.

We moderate for vibe, not category. Pruning is light, especially where a post creates interesting discussion. Experimenting is encouraged.

See the pinned paper on Shitposting as Public Pedagogy if you want the academic case for why this works.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] MyTurtleSwimsUpsideDown@fedia.io 60 points 1 year ago (3 children)

2+2 = 5

…for sufficiently large values of 2

[–] Quill7513@slrpnk.net 23 points 1 year ago

i was in a math class once where a physics major treated a particular variable as one because at csmic scale the value of the variable basically doesn't matter. the math professor both was and wasn't amused

[–] Lemmyoutofhere@lemmy.ca 10 points 1 year ago (4 children)
[–] jaupsinluggies@feddit.uk 8 points 1 year ago

Statistician: 1+1=sqrt(2)

[–] umbraroze@slrpnk.net 6 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Computer science: 2+2=4 (for integers at least; try this with floating point numbers at your own peril, you absolute fool)

[–] callyral@pawb.social 6 points 1 year ago

0.1 + 0.2 = 0.30000000000000004

[–] socsa@piefed.social 1 points 1 year ago

Freshmen engineer: wow floating point numbers are great.

Senior engineer: actually the distribution of floating point errors is mindfuck.

Professional engineer: the mean error for all pairwaise 64 bit floating point operations is smaller than the Planck constant.

comparing floats for exact equality should be illegal, IMO

[–] WR5@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

I mean as an engineer, this should actually be 2+2=4 +/-1.

[–] bhamlin@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Found the engineer