this post was submitted on 25 Jun 2025
1042 points (98.7% liked)

Technology

72321 readers
2810 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Laser@feddit.org 56 points 1 week ago (7 children)

I had a phone without before, that one came with a simple cheap passive adapter for USB-C to 3.5mm headset. You lose out on using headphones while charging, but other than that I was never really inconvenienced...

[–] warm@kbin.earth 78 points 1 week ago (6 children)

After having a phone without a 3.5mm port or a microSD card slot, the top 2 features I want on a phone are a 3.5mm port and a microSD card slot.

Shame Sony discontinued their Xperia 5 series, even if they were also excessively priced.

[–] lime@feddit.nu 17 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

aw man, this is the first i'm hearing about discontinuation. apparently it's because people want larger phones?!

i have a 5 IV and it is by far the largest phone i've ever owned... i wish it was like an inch smaller. but it was the only model i could find that doesn't have a non-rectangular screen. these bloody camera cutouts are everywhere and i never even use the front camera.

[–] warm@kbin.earth 10 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Yep... everyone wants phablets. Apparently.

I don't mind the cutouts (if done right), they just sit in the notification bar, so they never obscure anything anyway. That's a place Sony could have shaved off the extra height imo, the top and bottom bezels are pretty unnecessary.

We are slowly moving to under-screen cameras now though.

[–] lime@feddit.nu 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

i mean the bezels together are less than 1cm. and the notch takes space from notifications, with two sim cards and a vpn active that shit overflows instantly anyway.

[–] warm@kbin.earth 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Fair, I suppose it depends on how the software handles it too. Personally I never let notifications stack up and the VPN for me is on the other side. I'd personally rather have the shorter phone and a cutout.

[–] lime@feddit.nu 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

vpn is on the right, yeah. but this is with just one sim:

with two i get another signal strength and wifi calling symbol. it's already collapsing them when not on the quick setting screen, which is very frustrating.

[–] invisibleOcelot@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago (2 children)

FYI, you can disable the icons you don't want/need using (https://github.com/zacharee/Tweaker). Although that doesn't solve the actual problem...

[–] lime@feddit.nu 3 points 1 week ago

i do want the icons, yeah.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] idiomaddict@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

We are slowly moving to under-screen cameras now though.

Nothing better than a selfie from a low angle, right?

[–] lime@feddit.nu 12 points 1 week ago (1 children)

i think they mean "under" as in "behind".

[–] idiomaddict@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] warm@kbin.earth 4 points 1 week ago

Yes that's exactly it. A camera under/behind the display. Not at the bottom of the screen aha (the bottom changes I guess too, depending on your phone rotation).

[–] Mandrilleren@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago (2 children)

The Sony form factor is the best on the market IMO. You can hold it in you hand and get more screen in the height.

[–] FreedomAdvocate@lemmy.net.au 1 points 6 days ago

They’re really no different to a regular iPhone or iPhone pro in terms of size.

https://www.phonearena.com/phones/size/Apple-iPhone-16-Pro,Sony-Xperia-5-V/phones/12239,12193

[–] lime@feddit.nu 3 points 1 week ago

agree, i just wish they kept a model like the Z* Compact around.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] stealth_cookies@lemmy.ca 29 points 1 week ago (3 children)

I disagree about this being a good solution. USB-C is not meant to take the strain of being used as an audio port when being used in the go so there is risk of damaging the port while a headphone jack is more stable and allows the plug to rotate. Plus I don't want to have a dingle I can forget when in a rush.

[–] idiomaddict@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)

They should make cases with the adapter built in, the way they used to (still do?) for external battery packs.

[–] warm@kbin.earth 2 points 1 week ago

Or just put the port in the phone.

[–] PrinzKasper@feddit.org 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Plus I don't want to have a dingle I can forget when in a rush.

Just have the dongle permanently attached to your earbuds like it's a part of the cable.

[–] potustheplant@feddit.nl 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (1 children)

Awesome solution. Remove the port that everything used to have and make consumers buy adapters. I have like 5 headphones. Should I go buy an adapter for each one? Not to mention that I can easily fix a headphone cable but if a 3.5 to usb-c adapter breaks, it basically becomes junk.

[–] Aatube@kbin.melroy.org 3 points 1 week ago (2 children)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] masterspace@lemmy.ca 25 points 1 week ago (2 children)

You also have to remember to have that adapter with you

[–] Laser@feddit.org 25 points 1 week ago (1 children)

An issue shared with the headphones themselves

[–] Fermion@feddit.nl 22 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I just leave the adapter plugged into the headphones. Then there's nothing extra to manage.

[–] Ulrich@feddit.org 7 points 1 week ago (3 children)

I have like a dozen pairs of headphones

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] HiTekRedNek@lemmy.world 11 points 1 week ago (2 children)

You can find adapters that can charge while still having a 3.5mm back

[–] Badabinski@kbin.earth 8 points 1 week ago

I use one of those daily and god they're all terrible. They're huge and they all break really easily. My phone is fucking huge, just give me a built in headphone jack!

[–] hcbxzz@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago

fast charging / USB-PD may not work, and 3.5mm media controls may not pass through properly

[–] Panties@lemmy.ca 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)

It's really a small inconvenience, but using an adapter would mean I'd be prone to misplace it when I use my headphones on anything else, so it hardly makes anything better

[–] Laser@feddit.org 6 points 1 week ago (4 children)

The reason for not using a headphone jack is making it simpler for the manufacturer, one less connector to handle which also limits how slim a phone can be.

I'm not saying this is good for the consumer, but there are reasons for integrating the functionality into the USB-C port.

[–] shaggyb@lemmy.world 20 points 1 week ago (2 children)

For $700 I'm not interested in compromising my own convenience for theirs.

[–] FreedomAdvocate@lemmy.net.au 0 points 6 days ago

Then you’re going to have to go and start your own phone company. Good luck to you, let us know when your phone comes out.

[–] Laser@feddit.org 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Fair, though the fact doesn't exist in a vacuum.

If you want easily replaceable parts and a system that can unlock the bootloader for example, your argument can be made for 99% of phones on the market. The more requirements you add, the smaller the scope gets until there are no devices left to choose from.

[–] warm@kbin.earth 4 points 1 week ago

We were doing perfectly fine 10 years ago and manufacturing has only gotten more advanced, the only real reason the 3.5mm port was removed is because Apple wanted to sell people their AirPods. That's literally it. The rest of the manufacturers soon followed suit when they realised how many people were buying AirPods.

[–] Ulrich@feddit.org 9 points 1 week ago (1 children)

It's not hard to manufacture a headphone jack. We've been doing it since the 80s. Probably costs them a penny BOM.

[–] ProjectPatatoe@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I don't think his point was the jack itself but the device around the jack. Physically and electronically.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] hexonxonx@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 1 week ago (1 children)

These points were all disproved long ago. The jack is a the same thickness as the display.

The reason is because BT headphones have a much higher margin, and need to be replaced every few years because of the battery (if not already replaced because they were lost or damaged).

It's just a dumb cash grab.

[–] FreedomAdvocate@lemmy.net.au 1 points 6 days ago

This would make sense if the only Bluetooth headphones that worked with the phone were made by the same company, but alas, that’s not how it works.

The reason they don’t have a headphone jack anymore is because it’s easier to make without it, saves money, has a built in replacement in BT, and people overwhelmingly love BT headphones due to being wireless.

[–] Ulrich@feddit.org 3 points 1 week ago

one less connector to handle which also limits how slim a phone can be.

The headphone jack is 3.5mm. iPhones are ~7.5mm thick, more than double. The smallest phone available on the market is 4.2mm.

[–] tigeruppercut@lemmy.zip 5 points 1 week ago

I have a tablet that came with a C to 3.5 adapter and it worked well enough for a bit but soon enough it was only intermittently allowing the headphone connection to work, with a message about the port being dirty or something. Yet I could go right from unplugging that and putting the charger in and it worked fine.

There's just no substitute for a dedicated port, especially when it barely takes up any room

[–] ColeSloth@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

That means the audio still goes through another DAC, lowering the sound quality, compared to an analog 3.5 jack. Also, who wants to further risk wearing out\vreaking their charge port, jack inputs almost seem like they can't break.

[–] potustheplant@feddit.nl 2 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Technically it only goes through 1 dac, not "another one". But still, yeah, your phone's dac is most likely a lot better than the one on a $10 adapter. However, the usb-c spec does allow an analog audio signal passthrough. Whether that's available or not depends on the phone I guess.

load more comments (2 replies)