this post was submitted on 09 Feb 2025
29 points (100.0% liked)

Piracy: ꜱᴀɪʟ ᴛʜᴇ ʜɪɢʜ ꜱᴇᴀꜱ

68012 readers
319 users here now

⚓ Dedicated to the discussion of digital piracy, including ethical problems and legal advancements.

Rules • Full Version

1. Posts must be related to the discussion of digital piracy

2. Don't request invites, trade, sell, or self-promote

3. Don't request or link to specific pirated titles, including DMs

4. Don't submit low-quality posts, be entitled, or harass others



Loot, Pillage, & Plunder

📜 c/Piracy Wiki (Community Edition):

🏴‍☠️ Other communities

FUCK ADOBE!

Torrenting/P2P:

Gaming:


💰 Please help cover server costs.

Ko-Fi Liberapay
Ko-fi Liberapay

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Xanza@lemm.ee 7 points 1 year ago (5 children)

Not to mention that Swartz had a JSTOR account, which means he was legally entitled to download the things that he did. The part they didn't like was that he used scripts to download en-mass, and a bunch of boomer fucks thought he actually committed a crime.

[–] IllNess@infosec.pub 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

Well in the Social Network movie and chapter 2 of the Accidental Billionaires, Mark Zuckerberg used wget in shell scripts to get copyrighted images for private servers.

Can we give punish him?

[–] sus@programming.dev 2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Spotify also originally got all its music by pirating it. But later it started printing money for record labels (while fucking over musicians) so all was forgiven.

[–] 3dmvr@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 1 year ago

and crunchyroll

[–] 3dmvr@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 1 year ago

and youtube got big hosting everything, they took years to take down hella anime, movies, etc.

[–] Natanox@discuss.tchncs.de 0 points 1 year ago

No, he's part of the US oligarchy. Don't criticize too much or you might happen to have sudden, unexplainable tech problems and legal trouble. /s

[–] zipzoopaboop@lemmynsfw.com 1 points 1 year ago

I can't remember his name but one particular Cia or FBI fuck was trying to make a name for himself and spun the whole thing as a big deal when crime wise, it could have potentially been trespassing at the maximum. They had been following aaron and looking for reasons to charge him which was giving him justified paranoia outside of this particular event

[–] coronach@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

To be fair, he broke and entered a networking closet as well. But I guess that is a separate issue.

The university AND jstor were pretty quick to get as uninvolved from that mess as quick as possible, so it really doesn't matter.... But what you're saying has nothing to do with the case and is also not true. "Broke and entered" implies forced physical access into a clearly forbidden area. The network closet was a room that was left unlocked and was frequently used by janitorial staff to put junk in.

[–] SARGE@startrek.website 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Old people and overreacting to normal things because new ideas are scary and confusing

Name a more iconic duo

[–] Gingernate@programming.dev 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I fear getting old because of this

[–] lord_ryvan@ttrpg.network 0 points 1 year ago

My grandma is the opposite of this, he embraces learning new technology and wants to stay informed with new developments.
So far my dad is like this as well.
I strive to become like them, they're both pretty great people all-round!

[–] tate@lemmy.sdf.org 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I'm with you right up to the ageism. The folks who persecuted Aaron were older than him, but they were not boomers, and what they did had nothing to do with his age or theirs.

Bigotry is always wrong.

[–] DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] tate@lemmy.sdf.org -1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Fine. Use a word for it that isn't a bigoted slur.

[–] eugenevdebs@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)
[–] tate@lemmy.sdf.org -1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

When it is used to denigrate a "mindset" that you don't like, it is most certainly a slur. When used to refer to folks who were born between 1945 and 1960, it is not.

We've all agreed (almost all) to stop using the word retarded to refer derogatorily to folks who do not have that medical condition.

Any word can be used as a slur.

[–] itslilith@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 1 year ago

Any word can be used as a slur? Really? Please explain what a slur is to you. I agree that every word can be used as an insult, you absolute Brokkoli, but that's down to tone and context, more than anything, isn't a slur more than that?