this post was submitted on 05 Jun 2025
616 points (98.9% liked)

Fuck Cars

12006 readers
1419 users here now

A place to discuss problems of car centric infrastructure or how it hurts us all. Let's explore the bad world of Cars!

Rules

1. Be CivilYou may not agree on ideas, but please do not be needlessly rude or insulting to other people in this community.

2. No hate speechDon't discriminate or disparage people on the basis of sex, gender, race, ethnicity, nationality, religion, or sexuality.

3. Don't harass peopleDon't follow people you disagree with into multiple threads or into PMs to insult, disparage, or otherwise attack them. And certainly don't doxx any non-public figures.

4. Stay on topicThis community is about cars, their externalities in society, car-dependency, and solutions to these.

5. No repostsDo not repost content that has already been posted in this community.

Moderator discretion will be used to judge reports with regard to the above rules.

Posting Guidelines

In the absence of a flair system on lemmy yet, let’s try to make it easier to scan through posts by type in here by using tags:

Recommended communities:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The grieving parents of a 7-year-old child who died hours after being hit by a car were charged with involuntary manslaughter after allowing him and his brother, 10, to walk home unaccompanied by an adult from a nearby grocery store.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Steve@communick.news 25 points 3 days ago (2 children)

The driver is responsible for the damage their vehicle causes. It doesn't matter if they did something illegal or not. If the article is accurate, nobody should be arrested. But the driver would be civilly liable for the death of the kid.

[–] Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world 2 points 3 days ago (2 children)

The way the article describes it is that the kids were attempting to cross a 4 lane road, not at a crosswalk. And unexpectedly steps into oncoming traffic.

It doesn't mention speed, but lets say the guy is driving at 30mph which is a standard speed in the US. Nothing dangerous there. And then a kid just jumps into the road unexpectedly, there may not even be time to react. I've seen it happen in the 90s, where this kid is just standing there, ran after a ball, and the car was right there. Kid went flying. At least 10 feet. He survived, but there's only so much you can do when you're given no reaction time.

Same reason you never try to go around gate crossings for railroad tracks. If a vehicle is moving, it needs time to stop. Especially trains. Depending on cargo and speed, they can take up to a full mile to stop. Cars can stop obviously faster, but not instant.

[–] Steve@communick.news 11 points 3 days ago (1 children)

And the driver would be free to make that argument to defend themselves in the law suit.

[–] technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

No need for court when the cops and prosecutors have already made up that argument for him. \s

[–] technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

The way the article ~~describes it~~ recites the cops' tale

Gotta remember that the news is just a stenographer for a cops and the cops are constant liars.