this post was submitted on 07 May 2025
-13 points (27.6% liked)
Controversial - the place to discuss controversial topics
452 readers
1 users here now
Controversial - the community to discuss controversial topics.
Challenge others opinions and be challenged on your own.
This is not a safe space nor an echo-chamber, you come here to discuss in a civilized way, no flaming, no insults!
Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence, "trust me bro" is not a valid argument.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
I assume you mean something like weight classes in combat sports? No one expects a welterweight to fight a heavyweight. And the existence of either class doesn't reduce the achievements of anyone not in it.
Let's use combat sports, how would you measure "approximate physical ability" ?
If you just go by weight and don't split the genders, biological women won't stand a chance.
I don't know. Weight alone is likely a poor measure, and one we see exploited in combat sports to the harm and even death of competators. Working that specifically out is a question for sports scientists I think, rather than basing it on the feelings and biases of spectators.
What I am talking about is the cultural acceptance of sectioned competition, and that it doesn't reduce the achievements and glory of competators.
Basing the rules of your sports on
the feelings and biases of spectators
sounds wild.and is open for abuse, if most spectators want to disqualify a person because they don't like them, they would be able to.