this post was submitted on 02 May 2025
9 points (66.7% liked)

change my view

291 readers
1 users here now

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

NASA has an "Artemis mission" planned. The goal is to establish a permanent moon base. But I don't see what we can do there that we can't do with robots. We'd have to provide space for people to live, and food, and water, and all that stuff. Not even mentioning 1/6 gravity isn't exactly healthy.

I'd rather we just send robots to the moon and do what we need to do there until we can easily build huge habitats for people.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Oka@sopuli.xyz -2 points 9 months ago (1 children)

I agree. Humans are an invasive species

[–] cynar@lemmy.world 4 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Agreed, though we can also (potentially) act as an interplanetary "pioneer" species.

To be invasive implies an existing population to invade. The other planets don't have life, best we can tell.

[–] Oka@sopuli.xyz 1 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

Plant life :p But it would be nice if, by the time we do reach interplanetary travel, we do not have to live off the land we visit.

[–] cynar@lemmy.world 1 points 9 months ago

We would live of the land, but it would be the land itself, not the life growing from it.