this post was submitted on 29 Apr 2025
513 points (99.2% liked)

News

35867 readers
1892 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] shittydwarf@lemmy.dbzer0.com 125 points 9 months ago (5 children)

We were headed down the conservative path, strange to think that the Trump regime saved our asses by being so insufferably horrible that the entire country woke up. Very grateful today that we have a functional adult behind the wheel during this difficult period

[–] T00l_shed@lemmy.world 53 points 9 months ago (3 children)

Still, over 40% of Canadians voters wanted pp. That number is too high. Also fuuuuuuuuck fptp

[–] Moose@moose.best 18 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Super pissed off FPTP is still a thing. My riding was quite interesting this year. Polls showed a safe conservative win with NDP slightly behind and liberals at barely anything. What actually happened was a huge number of liberal votes compared to what was expected and less conservative and NDP votes as a result. The conservatives won with only ~38% of the vote vs the over 50% they were showing in the polls. I can almost garuntee that if we had ranked choice, either NDP or liberals would have won. It's very frustrating as I'm certain a lot of the left leaning voters were focusing on a national level and not a local one.

[–] T00l_shed@lemmy.world 2 points 9 months ago

A common occurrence it feels like

[–] Tiger666@lemmy.ca 7 points 9 months ago

Most wanted change and not Peter rabbithair.

We need electoral reform in Canada.

[–] Thedogdrinkscoffee@lemmy.ca 3 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Over 40% wanted some aspect of the vote. Local Candidate, party or leader or other aspects. His own riding didn't want him. Lol! :D

Others still just didn't like the other parties as options. Extreme fringe elements like the various flavours of white supremacists just clung to something that would embrace them under the big tent.

[–] T00l_shed@lemmy.world 5 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Extreme fringe elements like the various flavours of white supremacists just clung to something that would embrace them under the big tent.

You're correct, but because the leaders of the party aren't actively distancing themselves from those fringe groups, they are complicit

[–] Thedogdrinkscoffee@lemmy.ca 2 points 9 months ago

Absolutely. I did say "embraced".

[–] uhmbah@lemmy.ca 17 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (2 children)

Liberals won by less than a million votes.

Does this map suggest that is going to happen again?

Some Americans avoided voting for Democrats because Israel.

Some Canadians avoided voting liberal because "we need change.".

It stops being politics when neo-fascists take over. Then it becomes survival. When your government wages war on YOU, the people.

Just ask the Americans.

[–] Phil_in_here@lemmy.ca 4 points 9 months ago

I fucking hate "it's time for a change".

Liberals are a 3 day old deli sandwich. And when Canadians say they want change the Conservatives show up telling you they're warm, fresh, and all-natural. Somehow half the population fails to recognize its horse shit!

Our 2.1 party system is what needs to change, and we need to be increasingly vocal about how high a priority that needs to be.

[–] bloooooort@sh.itjust.works 12 points 9 months ago (1 children)

We’re still heading towards a conservative path, although a more moderate one, with carney being center-right, and the conservatives holding almost half the seats.

[–] Kaput@lemmy.world 1 points 9 months ago

Canada's saving grace is that we have more than two parties. Liberals can't rely on the conservatives being worst than them as much as the Democrats do with the Republicans.

[–] HawlSera@lemm.ee 10 points 9 months ago (2 children)

I... I can't envision a world where conservatism doesn't beget more conservatism..

What a strange utopia you Canadians have

[–] Whats_your_reasoning@lemmy.world 3 points 9 months ago

It is amazing to witness a nation learning from another nation's mistake. It's such a smart, sensible thing to do. Voters in Canada were able to identify a pattern, imagine the consequences happening to themselves, and make a decision to not do the same failed thing as the U.S.

That's gotta be a crucial distinction between Canada and the U.S.

Here in the U.S., people ignore and downplay patterns (especially if the patterns hurt their feelings.) When pressed to explain an identical set of patterns, we're more likely to blame whoever is experiencing the patterns for causing them than to critically analyze the cause and effect surrounding them. [Examples I've heard through my life: "Poor people suffer because they're drug addicts." "Women don't get paid as much as men do because women are worse workers than men." "Black people live in violent neighborhoods because they're inherently violent."]

Too many of us are entrenched in the propaganda-sphere; we are too arrogant, vocal, and either unwilling or unable to engage in critical thought against our zeitgeist. I imagine that if the situation were flipped and Canada had been the first to fall to fascism, the U.S. would still follow. After all, if another country messed up, it's because they did it wrong. But we're too special, too important, Too Big to Fail™, so we could do the exact same thing and be confident that [consequence] could never happen to us.

Lotsa shocked Pikachu faces going around these days...

[–] Kecessa@sh.itjust.works 5 points 9 months ago

Well that and Lil'PP not being able to distance himself from his "Trump-lite" image because that would have turned away a big chunk of his base.