Moose

The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command.

• Orwell, 1984

Well, that certainly explains his election sign that had a big F and U cut out of it that I was reading about the other day.

Mark my words, this will have consequences, and some people may ask in a couple of years how is it that no one came for help when they need it. And they shall remember that the blatantly insulted those they will be asking for help and that people just got sick of them.

These comments just make me sad, because I have a feeling you are not talking specifically about artists mad at AI art when you say 'some people'. You are letting the voices of a few people convince you to abadon the silence of a majority. And in this current political world, that could result in a lot of people who see eye to eye with you being punished.

Calculators don't need heaps of power to run. Calculators are not trained on the copyrighted works of artists. And that's only the start of the issues with your argument.

What a shit take.

My friend gifted it to me, otherwise I would have waited until the GOG release. Fantastic game, highly recommend. The story is so good so far, even if you haven't played the first.

Someone else mentioned Habitica already, there are a few out there. I think they usually call it gamification. The only one I tried and was able to commit to was Walkscape (specifically gamifying getting out), although I've been slacking due to nasty winter weather.

Nobody has claimed you support the conservatives in this thread up until this comment at least, they've only debated the points you have and happen to disagree with your stance because it doesn't hold up. Don't fall for the trap narrative of thinking everyone here hates you just because they think you're conservative. They are annoyed because while there have been some good posts and points in favor of him getting his security clearance and instances of previous conservative opposition leaders being able to act on the information provided by CSIS, you have provided nothing but the same points Pierre is trying to use to convince us it's better if he doesn't. You said it yourself, dogmatic adherence to a narrative. If this has never been an issue for past conservative leaders, never been an issue for other opposition party leaders, why is it for Pierre?

Yeah it was WoW early on, a debuff from a boss was bugged and was allowed to spread outside the raid.

So far, both liberals and conservatives have promised housing GST tax relief. Liberals for first time buyers, conservatives for any buyers. One of these makes a whole lot more sense to me. Why give a GST break to Bob who's buying his 4th property to rent out?

I've been asking for years why our opposition party leader refuses to get a security clearance, or even attend briefings that Justin Trudeau had to ask CSIS to rewrite the rules of so he could also be briefed. The "liberals don't want me speaking freely!" excuse is starting to piss me off. What's the actual reason Pierre? Too afraid to see how foreign interference might affect your party and instead want to plug your ears about it? Or is it he just can't get one and this speaking freely stuff just happens to be a convinient excuse? Either way, I don't buy his reasoning as being legitimate.

Good luck, it's been 280 days since I put in for my renewal and it's still apparently only passes the initial review. Called about 4 times now, no help at all. Maybe the AB CFO will be a bit better for time.