this post was submitted on 14 Apr 2025
300 points (98.1% liked)

News

28964 readers
4382 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

US army investigates after young private follows the Base, which has vowed to recruit soldiers for so-called race war

An active-duty serviceman in the US army is openly following a proscribed neo-Nazi terrorist group on social media, one that has vowed to recruit soldiers in preparation for a so-called race war.

Experts say examples like this shows how under Pete Hegseth, the Pentagon is allowing extremism to go unchecked.

On the surface, following a TikTok account might seem like a minor infraction for a young private in the 1st Infantry Division. But not only has that private followed the Base, a violent neo-Nazi terrorist organization once the target of an FBI investigation, there are directives issued under Joe Biden that discourages that kind of social media activity.

But in February, the DoD issued a memo halting a major counter-extremism initiative rooting out white nationalists and far-right influences among servicemen, citing that it was not in line with Donald Trump’s executive orders. Since, the efficacy of rooting out the far right within the ranks remains unclear.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 31 points 1 week ago (5 children)

It's more, "hey this is not being allowed to happen without repercussion"

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 week ago (4 children)

I mean, the Army is on the record in the article as saying that the behavior would not be tolerated and that they are investigating. He'll probably get UCMJ'd. I think "without repercussion" is strong.

Should there be more protections to detect this stuff early? Maybe. But, like, that doesn't feel like as flashy a headline I guess.

And idk, should the Armed Forces have people actively monitoring all their personnel's private lives 24/7? Seems a little much to me.

I'm just having trouble figuring out what the takeaway is. What "repercussions" do you want to see here? He gets punished in some way? Cause odds are good he will, if they can figure out who it is (since the Guardian didn't share the name with the Army, per the article.) So what's the story?

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 week ago (2 children)

But in February, the DoD issued a memo halting a major counter-extremism initiative rooting out white nationalists and far-right influences among servicemen, citing that it was not in line with Donald Trump’s executive orders. Since, the efficacy of rooting out the far right within the ranks remains unclear.

The story is these measures to start having an effect with extremism becoming more visibly prevalent.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I mean, you say more visible, but it's not like these things haven't always happened. I personally knew a guy a few years back who was UCMJ'd for being a racist.

I suppose you're right that he didn't have an article written in the Guardian about him, so it's more visible in that sense. But it seems a little tautological to write an article saying things are more visible, if the "more visibility" in question is that you wrote an article about them.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago

Fair point. I guess we will see how things develop.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)