300
Fears over extremism in US military as soldier revealed as neo-Nazi TikTok follower
(www.theguardian.com)
this post was submitted on 14 Apr 2025
300 points (98.1% liked)
News
37771 readers
2998 users here now
Welcome to the News community!
Rules:
1. Be civil
Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.
2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.
Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.
3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.
Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.
4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.
Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.
5. Only recent news is allowed.
Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.
6. All posts must be news articles.
No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.
7. No duplicate posts.
If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.
8. Misinformation is prohibited.
Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.
9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.
All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.
10. Don't copy entire article in your post body
For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.
founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
I mean, this isn't good obviously, but it also doesn't feel like news.
The US military employs almost 3million people. I challenge you to grab a broad swath of 3 million people and not have a few neo-nazis in the bunch.
Which isn't to say that it's okay or should be tolerated. Just that, like, it isn't news. Or, at least, not any more news than "Nazi sypathizer exists on earth" is news.
It's more, "hey this is not being allowed to happen without repercussion"
I mean, the Army is on the record in the article as saying that the behavior would not be tolerated and that they are investigating. He'll probably get UCMJ'd. I think "without repercussion" is strong.
Should there be more protections to detect this stuff early? Maybe. But, like, that doesn't feel like as flashy a headline I guess.
And idk, should the Armed Forces have people actively monitoring all their personnel's private lives 24/7? Seems a little much to me.
I'm just having trouble figuring out what the takeaway is. What "repercussions" do you want to see here? He gets punished in some way? Cause odds are good he will, if they can figure out who it is (since the Guardian didn't share the name with the Army, per the article.) So what's the story?
The story is these measures to start having an effect with extremism becoming more visibly prevalent.
I mean, you say more visible, but it's not like these things haven't always happened. I personally knew a guy a few years back who was UCMJ'd for being a racist.
I suppose you're right that he didn't have an article written in the Guardian about him, so it's more visible in that sense. But it seems a little tautological to write an article saying things are more visible, if the "more visibility" in question is that you wrote an article about them.
Fair point. I guess we will see how things develop.
Yep, and if you monitored people's personal lives constantly minority groups like LGBT would be far less likely to join.