this post was submitted on 10 Apr 2025
485 points (99.0% liked)

A Comm for Historymemes

2329 readers
1616 users here now

A place to share history memes!

Rules:

  1. No sexism, racism, homophobia, transphobia, assorted bigotry, etc.

  2. No fascism, atrocity denial, etc.

  3. Tag NSFW pics as NSFW.

  4. Follow all Lemmy.world rules.

Banner courtesy of @[email protected]

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
[email protected]
[email protected]
485
Always remember to flex on your disciples (lemmy.world)
submitted 3 days ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
34 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 14 points 2 days ago (1 children)

As often said, no academic argues Jesus was not a historical figure. Only militant terminally online atheists do.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 2 days ago (2 children)

I'm not talking about whether Jesus existed or not. The bible is not a historic accord is what I'm saying.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 days ago

Got you, no argument against that

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Still, Simon/Peter could just as fine be as real as the person historically named Jesus. Assuming Jesus wasn't talking to imaginary friends all day.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 days ago

That’s not their point. Their point is the Bible isn’t a reliable source.