[Dormant] moved to !historymemes@piefed.social

3481 readers

2 users here now

THIS COMM HAS MOVED

!historymemes@piefed.social

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

495

submitted 10 months ago by PugJesus@lemmy.world to c/historymemes@lemmy.world

32 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] CyberEgg@discuss.tchncs.de 17 points 10 months ago (2 children)

I'm not talking about whether Jesus existed or not. The bible is not a historic accord is what I'm saying.

[–] bigFab@lemmy.world 4 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Still, Simon/Peter could just as fine be as real as the person historically named Jesus. Assuming Jesus wasn't talking to imaginary friends all day.

[–] ocean@lemmy.selfhostcat.com 1 points 10 months ago

That’s not their point. Their point is the Bible isn’t a reliable source.

[–] ocean@lemmy.selfhostcat.com 3 points 10 months ago

Got you, no argument against that