this post was submitted on 05 Apr 2025
13 points (100.0% liked)
Typography & fonts
483 readers
12 users here now
A community to discuss and share information about typography and fonts
Sibling community:
Rules of conduct:
The usual ones on Lemmy and Mastodon. In short: be kind or at least respectful, no offensive language, no harassment, no spam.
(Icon: detail from the title of Bringhurst's Elements of Typographic Style. Banner: details from pages 6 and 12, ibid.)
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Looks really cool for what it is, but:
What does it mean to be a humanist font?
It doesn't refer to a characteristic of the font, but to a category.
Edit. Now that I look at it, maybe they are using that word a bit too freely?
Here's another guide describing some of the different types of fonts :)
https://www.monotype.com/resources/guide-type-styles
Some are named after specific designers who originated the style with it becoming a design trend and spawning new similar designs. (Like the Didone fonts, named after the designers for didot and bodini)
Others just originated in a particular time period where certain features were considered fashionable or typical for type designers, with many of the new fonts cropping up sharing similar characteristics (like humanist, which was sort of the modernizing evolution of "blackletter" typefaces that were the original style typically used with the printing press) Black letter is very ornate traditional caligraphy, usually with lots of contrast in line weight (some lines much thicker and other lines much thinner), and humanist typefaces are also styles after caligraphy, but much simpler and more reserved
From the linked website:
(Full acknowledgement I am very much a layman so take all this with a grain of salt, this is my understanding, but I hope it helps!)
@[email protected] @[email protected]
I read what both of you linked. To be perfectly honest? I still don't really get it. Kinda seems like it's called humanist just because?
? ??? ?
Yeah, looks like they weirdly happened to want to describe their font like that unaware that the word already had a concrete meaning in typography context.
Have the feeling this might be one of those things where I hyperfixate, do a deep dive, and never get an actually satisfying answer.....
There is at least contrast, as in variation in line width like you'd see in caligraphy, it's just very subtle. But yeah if they're using humanist font design features it feels like they're using them very sparingly and in extremely subtle ways
I'm no expert but I see what you mean 😅
Yeah I'm not actually sure where that specific term came from as a descriptor for that kind of typeface. It might just be that someone decided to call it that because they felt it expressed their reason for designing in the way they did
Perhaps they felt moving away from the formality of blackletter felt more accessible at a time when not everyone could read, and was more "human"
🤷♂️
Probably just gonna do my best not to think about it too much. Like I said to @[email protected] this seems like a thing that could take all my free time for the next few weeks, and leave me disappointed with no real answers. 🤷