this post was submitted on 02 Apr 2025
1393 points (98.3% liked)

Programmer Humor

22324 readers
1943 users here now

Welcome to Programmer Humor!

This is a place where you can post jokes, memes, humor, etc. related to programming!

For sharing awful code theres also Programming Horror.

Rules

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 50 points 1 week ago (4 children)

I mean, you could just use smarter stuff that's open source and has local API, or do what I do and build your own devices where you can ¯⁠\⁠_⁠(⁠ツ⁠)⁠_⁠/⁠¯

[–] [email protected] 37 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (4 children)

Even there though, what is the actual point of a phone app controlled smart toilet, even if you open sourced the whole thing? Unlocking one's phone and tapping the app icon, and then presumably a button on the app, is going to take more time than one press of a lever that one is right next to anyway, and the latter doesn't present as many points of failure.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (3 children)

Well if you read the product description it was to allow AI Bidet control. However they had not received funding for AI so it was outsourced to a team of laborers in India using cameras and joysticks.

It also logged the consistency, frequency and matter samples from all BMs so you could make informed dedication opinions.

Spoiler/s

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)

informed dedication opinions.

Hmmmmm

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Damn was supposed to be defecation autocorrect got me.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 week ago

Oooohhhhh, that makes sense.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 week ago

I heard they sold a license for the camera feed and controls access to EA for their next pay-to-play iOS game. The shareholders are really excited for this synergy.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago

I asked for AI Biden control smh

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 week ago (3 children)

I have no interest in one, but playing devil's advocate, some might consider it more sanitary since you don't have to touch the toilet to flush and have the choice of not being near it, hopefully avoiding any spray.

Also, if your guests use the restroom, you can startle them at any time.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 week ago (2 children)

How do the guests flush the toilet without the app? They have to ask you?

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 week ago

That occurred to me while writing my comment, as well, and I don't like the implications.

I would imagine they have to ask you, yes. If the toilet can be flushed without authentication, they'd probably still have to ask you how.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Of course. My roof, my water, my rules! /s

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 week ago (1 children)

more sanitary

Foot pedal flush really needs to become a thing.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago (4 children)

Wait, why isn't it? There's been so many weird flush designs over the years.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Probably just the extra cost of linkage and maybe risk of tripping over it

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago

The pullcord kind used to be pretty common, I think. This is just that with a pedal.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I assume lack of demand. In your own home, you'd be keeping the handle clean, and public washrooms often use the touchless sensor types.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago

and public washrooms often use the touchless sensor types.

Now. I'm guessing you only have to go back to 2000 for that to be a futuristic new thing, though, while the history of the modern flush toilet goes back to the Victorian era.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Designing foot-operated things tends to fly in the face of modern accessibility standards. Wheelchair users already have enough problems using public toilets.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago

They can still have both. A foot pedal for those who want it, a standard handle for those who don't or can't. In fact, retrofitting existing handle-flush toilets to add foot pedals could make a lot of sense.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago

Oh shit, I guess that's true, yeah. Wheelchair bathrooms are there own thing but not every place has them, at least where I live.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago

Huh, so they do exist then.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Yeah, wouldn't want to get bacteria on your hands a few seconds before washing your hands.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Yeah I'd much rather spread poo particles all over my smartphone instead

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago

Can you not go from the toilet to the sink without your phone?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Ok maybe the flushing part is a bit overkill and mostly a joke, but a toilet that can deliver notifications like if it's clogged for example before you use it and make it worse would have fantastic utility IMO

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 week ago (2 children)

This makes zero sense. If it's clogged, you'd know beforehand when you look in the bowl. Why the would anyone need a notification for that?

The ONLY utility that I could see here is if the notification logged who did the clogging so you could give them shit.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Toilets can appear to have flushed fully, but still have...material...stuck in the U-bend that hasn't completely evacuated the toilet. A subsequent flush won't work, even though the water in the bowl is clean.

Ask me how I know.

That said, this could almost certainly be better-solved in other ways. Maybe by preventing the tank from refilling if there's still something in the u-bend (then you'd know it needed attention because there'd be no water in it)?

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago

Let's just say this happens a lot in my house.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

A little display or indicator light somewhere on the toilet itself would be better than connecting it to some IOT app

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago

Oh, absolutely. I was responding only to "If it's clogged, you'd know beforehand when you look in the bowl."

An app for a toilet is a stupid idea, full stop.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)
  1. We don't know that the toilet has this sensing capability.
  2. If it does, the actual fix is the same as if it were a regular toilet.

This just isn't an issue that needs technology as a solution.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago

125% agreed. I was responding only to "If it's clogged, you'd know beforehand when you look in the bowl." I think there's potentially an engineering solution--a fluid dynamics engineering solution--but definitely not an app.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago

But in this scenario don’t the toddlers need phones? Wait do toddlers all have phones now?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

I guess, but I've never heard of a toilet clogging before it's used.

There's other better examples, though. Smart thermostats get plenty of use from the people I know with them. A fridge that tracks how long stuff has been inside would be dope. Smart lights have uses.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Toilets can appear to have flushed fully, but still have...material...stuck in the U-bend that hasn't completely evacuated the toilet. A subsequent flush won't work, even though the water in the bowl is clean.

Ask me how I know.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Well, I suppose it is the kind of system where a lot of weird non-deterministic things can happen.

What kind of sensor are we thinking of here? Optical? I know it's a real issue to find something that doesn't foul or misread even in the simpler application of an RV septic tank.

I wonder if you could just put a window in the U-bend for manual inspection. It's supposed to be full of "clean" water most of the time anyway.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago

Yeah, not to mention, adding any sort of electronic components to the thing would be dicey at best. A lot of bathrooms don't even have power outlets anywhere near the toilet.

I'd prefer some sort of pressure-activated valve or something, but this is an engineering challenge that's beyond my meager skills.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago

The privacy issues are nasty, but a smart toilet could actually be an incredibly useful device.

Can you imagine if every time you went to the bathroom, your toilet could do some of the basic stool / urine tests you get at the doctor's office? Certain diseases could be caught extremely early, and you wouldn't have to do anything different.

And then there are bidet functions. Forget smearing poop all over your ass with paper, wash the poop off with nice warm water every time.

I wouldn't want to have to use a smartphone app for that, but there's no reason you couldn't have a simple set of buttons on the toilet itself. You could keep the manual flush lever and only use that if you preferred, but if you wanted an even better experience and a better clean, that option would be available.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Stuff like openWRT routers get a pass.

If it has a local host API I would use it because it never has to connect to the internet.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 week ago

People also just need to be more selective about where and how they automate.

For example, I wanted my coffee to automatically start in the morning. So instead of buying a "smart" coffee maker, I bought the dumbest possible one and a smart switch. Now, no matter what happens with that switch, the worst that can happen is I have to manually hit a button to get coffee.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Yes, I don't hate the idea of smart-ish devices, if they're not cloud-dependent in any way and have some kind of manual override.

It's kind of painful to have a kitchen full of devices each implementing their own half-assed OSs separately, or even more than once in one device.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I have a wifi-enabled garage door opener whose manufacturer discontinued the Google Home connection for so that you have to use their app and see their Amazon or Walmart ads. I also have a wifi-enabled alarm system whose manufacturer apparently doesn't care about Matter integration or whatever. So leaving the house in my car requires the use of two different apps (three if I also need to turn off lights).

In actuality I just use the physical buttons. But there was a time that I had a beautiful dream of getting a smart lock and setting my house up to lock the doors, close the garage door, and arm the alarm when I pushed a button in the car--and, more importantly, undo all of those things in reverse when I got home.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

with Home Assistant it doesn't matter if your device adds a Google Home connection, Alexa, Apple Home, etc. Exactly what 'smart homes' should be.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago

I need to get on that, I guess.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago

I wish I was this smart. We really want to do a smart light show using Xlights but every time I try to learn it I feel so frankly dumb.