this post was submitted on 07 Mar 2025
28 points (100.0% liked)
Spaceflight
936 readers
33 users here now
Your one-stop shop for spaceflight news and discussion.
All serious posts related to spaceflight are welcome! JAXA, ISRO, CNSA, Roscosmos, ULA, RocketLab, Firefly, Relativity, Blue Origin, etc. (Arca and Pythom, if you must).
Other related space communities:
- [email protected]
- [email protected]
- [email protected]
- [email protected]
- [email protected]
- [email protected]
- [email protected]
- [email protected]
- [email protected]
Related meme community:
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
They should put a robotic arm on the next one so it can lift itself upright after it tips over.
Didn't they do that with one of the early Mars landers?
I recall there was one in a bag of balloons shaped like a tetrahedron. I think they ended up not needing to use the pusher mechanism because they essentially rolled a nat 4.
Spirit and Opportunity used the airbag landing system. The sides of the tetrahedron could open with enough force to right the platform no matter the orientation. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mars_Exploration_Rover#Airbags
Doing that on the moon wouldn't be very mass efficient. It'd need a skycrane part outside the airbags. Much more efficient to land the right way up.
Here's hoping ispace can land Hakuto-R number 2 in June without incident. 🤞
Once they do that the lander will always land upright and the arm will never be needed.
Even if simply the arms presence causes the lander to land upright, I would argue that the arm is still "needed" :)
Deterrence