They should put a robotic arm on the next one so it can lift itself upright after it tips over.
Spaceflight
Your one-stop shop for spaceflight news and discussion.
All serious posts related to spaceflight are welcome! JAXA, ISRO, CNSA, Roscosmos, ULA, RocketLab, Firefly, Relativity, Blue Origin, etc. (Arca and Pythom, if you must).
Other related space communities:
- [email protected]
- [email protected]
- [email protected]
- [email protected]
- [email protected]
- [email protected]
- [email protected]
- [email protected]
- [email protected]
Related meme community:
Didn't they do that with one of the early Mars landers?
I recall there was one in a bag of balloons shaped like a tetrahedron. I think they ended up not needing to use the pusher mechanism because they essentially rolled a nat 4.
Spirit and Opportunity used the airbag landing system. The sides of the tetrahedron could open with enough force to right the platform no matter the orientation. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mars_Exploration_Rover#Airbags
Doing that on the moon wouldn't be very mass efficient. It'd need a skycrane part outside the airbags. Much more efficient to land the right way up.
Here's hoping ispace can land Hakuto-R number 2 in June without incident. 🤞
Once they do that the lander will always land upright and the arm will never be needed.
Even if simply the arms presence causes the lander to land upright, I would argue that the arm is still "needed" :)
Deterrence
The money shot:
Their update states that their batteries are depleted, they don't expect them to recharge and that the mission is now over.
Yup, that lander is on its side. Damn, that sucks.
Yeah. Given that they kept the engine running at idle for a while, I was half expecting to see a trail. I'd like to know the dynamics of the touchdown. I'm sure they'll figure out most of it but they probably prioritised payload data over images of the touchdown.
Commiserations to IM. Really unlucky to fix issues from their first mission then end up with the same, if not a worse, result.
Maybe the moon’s on its side
The article's title is something ... 😂 On the other hand it's such a shame the mission went, presumably, wrong
Haven't seen Eric write about the SpaceX explosion yet. 🤔
Dude, it happened just a few hours ago. The guy has to sleep at same point, right? He did tweet about it, but it'll probably be a day or so before he publishes a full article.
https://x.com/SciGuySpace/status/1897793984509984974
Catching a falling rocket is still damned impressive. Just a remarkable engineering feat. Congratulations to the 1,000s of engineers at SpaceX who broke their minds working on that.
https://x.com/SciGuySpace/status/1897795132222537778
The loss of Starship on ascent during the second flight in a row is clearly a serious setback for SpaceX.
Yep. He isn't critical of SpaceX at all. Thats why.